2016-09-05 11:06 GMT+02:00 Ali KIZIL :
> 2016-09-05 12:04 GMT+03:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>
>> 2016-09-05 10:53 GMT+02:00 Ali KIZIL :
>>
>> > Is there any obstacle to release this patch ?
>>
>> Which patch?
>
> Sorry Carl, maybe I missed. I mean the patch for "add unscaled
> conversion from yuv420p to
2016-09-03 15:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> +static int planar8ToP010leWrapper
If you want, you can rename this function to planar8ToP01xleWrapper
or planar8ToP016leWrapper after removing the binary and.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ff
2016-09-05 12:04 GMT+03:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2016-09-05 10:53 GMT+02:00 Ali KIZIL :
>
> > Is there any obstacle to release this patch ?
>
> Which patch?
>
> Carl Eugen
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mai
2016-09-05 10:53 GMT+02:00 Ali KIZIL :
> Is there any obstacle to release this patch ?
Which patch?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
2016-09-04 20:34 GMT+03:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> Hi,
>
> On Sep 4, 2016 5:42 PM, "Timo Rothenpieler" wrote:
> >
> > On 9/4/2016 4:06 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > 2016-09-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> > >> The purpose of this patch is to make conversion from
> > >> yuv420p (8 bit) t
Hi,
On Sep 4, 2016 5:42 PM, "Timo Rothenpieler" wrote:
>
> On 9/4/2016 4:06 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > 2016-09-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> >> The purpose of this patch is to make conversion from
> >> yuv420p (8 bit) to p010 (10 bit) fast.
> >
> > Do I understand you correctly th
On 9/4/2016 4:06 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
>> The purpose of this patch is to make conversion from
>> yuv420p (8 bit) to p010 (10 bit) fast.
>
> Do I understand you correctly that your patch is
> faster without the change I suggested?
With the &:
Hi,
On Sep 4, 2016 5:33 PM, "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
> wrote:
>
> > 2016-09-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> > > The purpose of this patch is to make conversion from
> > > yuv420p (8 bit) to p010 (10 bit) fast.
> >
> > Do I u
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wrote:
> 2016-09-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> > The purpose of this patch is to make conversion from
> > yuv420p (8 bit) to p010 (10 bit) fast.
>
> Do I understand you correctly that your patch is
> faster without the change I sug
On Sep 4, 2016 5:02 PM, "Timo Rothenpieler" wrote:
>
> > Finally, with the change, the function can also be used
> > for P016, note that I tried to object to P010: It does not
> > serve any real purpose, if I remember correctly, the
> > explanation for the commit was that there is a bug in
> > FFm
2016-09-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> The purpose of this patch is to make conversion from
> yuv420p (8 bit) to p010 (10 bit) fast.
Do I understand you correctly that your patch is
faster without the change I suggested?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-
> Finally, with the change, the function can also be used
> for P016, note that I tried to object to P010: It does not
> serve any real purpose, if I remember correctly, the
> explanation for the commit was that there is a bug in
> FFmpeg's pix_fmt decision routine that needed to
> be worked-around
2016-09-04 15:42 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Leppkes :
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-09-04 13:10 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>>> On 9/4/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2016-09-03 15:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> +output_pixel(tdstY++, (t | (t << 8
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-04 13:10 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>> On 9/4/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2016-09-03 15:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
>>>
+output_pixel(tdstY++, (t | (t << 8)) & 0xFFC0);
>>>
>>> Please remove the "& 0xFFC0" h
2016-09-04 13:10 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 9/4/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-09-03 15:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
>>
>>> +output_pixel(tdstY++, (t | (t << 8)) & 0xFFC0);
>>
>> Please remove the "& 0xFFC0" here and below.
>
> Please explain your reasoning here.
The linke
On 9/4/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-03 15:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
>
>> +output_pixel(tdstY++, (t | (t << 8)) & 0xFFC0);
>
> Please remove the "& 0xFFC0" here and below.
Please explain your reasoning here.
___
ffmpeg-devel m
2016-09-03 15:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Rothenpieler :
> +output_pixel(tdstY++, (t | (t << 8)) & 0xFFC0);
Please remove the "& 0xFFC0" here and below.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listin
> @@ -236,6 +237,57 @@ static int planarToP010Wrapper(SwsContext *c, const
> uint8_t *src8[],
> return srcSliceH;
> }
>
> +#if AV_HAVE_BIGENDIAN || 1
Nevermind the || 1, left over from testing speed differences and forgot
to remove it.
___
ffmpe
---
libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c| 57
tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-p010le | 2 +-
tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-copy | 2 +-
tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-crop | 2 +-
tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-field | 2 +-
tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-
19 matches
Mail list logo
