Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-12-29 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc writes: pushed Thank you, this really helps a lot! Is there a reason why you added no tags for 0.9-dev and 0.10-dev? And could we add an additional n2.0-dev that points to the same revision as n1.3-dev? Carl Eugen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-12-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:28:58AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc writes: pushed Thank you, this really helps a lot! Is there a reason why you added no tags for 0.9-dev and 0.10-dev? And could we add an additional n2.0-dev that points to

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-12-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:45:01AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:12:56PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? that way a git describe on master would look like:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-12-02 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:12:56PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? that way a git describe on master would look like: n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3 instead of: n2.0-11670-gb227be3 (or any other tag than n2.5-dev

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-25 Thread Timothy Gu
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at wrote: Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at writes: Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? Yes please, this would make my life much easier. n2.5-dev sounds ok. Ping. Personally I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-16 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at writes: Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? Yes please, this would make my life much easier. n2.5-dev sounds ok. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-15 Thread wm4
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:36:14 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-15 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:13:27PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:36:14 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi

[FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-14 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? that way a git describe on master would look like: n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3 instead of: n2.0-11670-gb227be3 (or any other tag than n2.5-dev that we choose) it would not affect the ./version.sh output -- Michael

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-14 Thread wm4
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? that way a git describe on master would look like: n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3 instead of: n2.0-11670-gb227be3 (or any other tag than

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Branchpoint tags

2014-09-14 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched off ? that way a git describe on master would look like: