Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc writes:
pushed
Thank you, this really helps a lot!
Is there a reason why you added no tags for
0.9-dev and 0.10-dev?
And could we add an additional n2.0-dev
that points to the same revision as n1.3-dev?
Carl Eugen
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:28:58AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc writes:
pushed
Thank you, this really helps a lot!
Is there a reason why you added no tags for
0.9-dev and 0.10-dev?
And could we add an additional n2.0-dev
that points to
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:45:01AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:12:56PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched
off ?
that way a git describe on master would look like:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:12:56PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched
off ?
that way a git describe on master would look like:
n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3
instead of:
n2.0-11670-gb227be3
(or any other tag than n2.5-dev
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at wrote:
Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at writes:
Should we add git tags to the revissions where
releases are branched off ?
Yes please, this would make my life much easier.
n2.5-dev sounds ok.
Ping. Personally I
Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at writes:
Should we add git tags to the revissions where
releases are branched off ?
Yes please, this would make my life much easier.
n2.5-dev sounds ok.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:36:14 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi
Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:13:27PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:36:14 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi
Hi
Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched
off ?
that way a git describe on master would look like:
n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3
instead of:
n2.0-11670-gb227be3
(or any other tag than n2.5-dev that we choose)
it would not affect the ./version.sh output
--
Michael
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi
Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched
off ?
that way a git describe on master would look like:
n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3
instead of:
n2.0-11670-gb227be3
(or any other tag than
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi
Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched
off ?
that way a git describe on master would look like:
11 matches
Mail list logo