Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAlg7ZnwACgkQ+NaxlGp1aC7rHQCfeMtiAL4kPwIFd37da56aFtVY eiEAn3Vh0A63CcNSu6MuGVuo8p5U/CJw =eJcJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
> 3. Proprietary dependencies, which may or may not currently be an issue > anymore. Philip and Timo, how easy is it to get cuda/nvenc/cuvid/npp to > compile. > cuda/cuvid/nvenc don't need any external dependencies to compile, only to run. libnpp needs proprietary and non-redistributable headers

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Timothy Gu
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:52 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > I dont want to give a automated travis_ci system any write or admin > access, some of what i read hinted in that direction, some of what > i read hinted that this was not needed though > giving a automated system write access would be a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Timothy Gu
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:13 PM Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:26:13 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > > the OS will no longe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:26:13 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > > Michael Niedermayer

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Josh de Kock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016/11/27 19:00, Philip Langdale wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> Hi all > >> The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and >> OS. the OS will no longer get security updates in a fe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > > the OS will no longe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > the OS will no longer get security updates in a few months and the hw > does not always boot and its swit

[FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-26 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi all The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. the OS will no longer get security updates in a few months and the hw does not always boot and its switched off most of the time. and it has no other use anymore than running coverity. Ive tried to find someone a while ago t