Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-26 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-25): > [computer@archlinux ffmpeg]$ git sn libavdevice/|grep Paul\ B\ Mahol ~/prog/ffmpeg $ git sn libavformat/|grep Paul\ B\ Mahol git: 'sn' is not a git command. See 'git --help'. > I had great plans for libavdevice, but as my proposal to change API was > rejected I'm

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-25 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 8:09 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > > libavdevice is using libavformat API that is unacceptable maintenance > burden. > > This is a lie. You would not even know if libavdevice is a maintenance > burden, you never touch it. > [computer@archlinux

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > libavdevice is using libavformat API that is unacceptable maintenance burden. This is a lie. You would not even know if libavdevice is a maintenance burden, you never touch it. -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 9/24/23, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): >> Citations needed. > > > >> libavdevice have no API. > > Yes, that was my point. If you do not understand why it is an essential > part of libavdevice, I suggest you take the time to learn what > libavdevice is all about and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > Citations needed. > libavdevice have no API. Yes, that was my point. If you do not understand why it is an essential part of libavdevice, I suggest you take the time to learn what libavdevice is all about and refrain from commenting on it before you have gotten a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 9/24/23, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): >> Define 'works'. >> >> It is clearly sub-optimal. > > Many users use it for many different tasks and it serves them > efficiently. > > There are probably ways to enhance the API of libavdevice. If you have > suggestions, then

[FFmpeg-devel] libavdevice (was: FFmpeg release 6.1 (SDR Plans))

2023-09-24 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): > Define 'works'. > > It is clearly sub-optimal. Many users use it for many different tasks and it serves them efficiently. There are probably ways to enhance the API of libavdevice. If you have suggestions, then please share them. But when you say that libavdevices