Le decadi 10 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 17 +
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_tile.c b/libavfilter/vf_tile.c
> index
Nack.
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 12 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_tile.c b/libavfilter/vf_tile.c
> index
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> No it doesn't work like that any more.
>
> Some folks commit to maintained code by someone else without prior review.
>
> Why I should not be one of them?
Are you trying to derail the project on purpose?
Now, please behave like a
On 10/28/17, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 10/28/17, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>>> I already posted another version which I will push shortly.
>>
>> No, you will wait until I approve the patch, since it is code
On 10/28/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> I already posted another version which I will push shortly.
>
> No, you will wait until I approve the patch, since it is code that I
> maintain. That is how it works.
No it doesn't
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> I already posted another version which I will push shortly.
No, you will wait until I approve the patch, since it is code that I
maintain. That is how it works.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On 10/28/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> You still have not provided valid reason to block it.
>
> Your first patch was wrong. I have observed a possible flaw in the
> second one. I thought I had a test case to show it,
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> You still have not provided valid reason to block it.
Your first patch was wrong. I have observed a possible flaw in the
second one. I thought I had a test case to show it, maybe I was wrong. I
need to check and test.
Now, I might add,
On 10/28/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> Gonna apply this patch soonTM because of no valid reasons to block it.
>
> No, you will not.
You still have not provided valid reason to block it.
testsrc2 filter hang is unrelated
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Gonna apply this patch soonTM because of no valid reasons to block it.
No, you will not.
--
Nicolas George
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On 10/28/17, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 10/28/17, Clement Boesch wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> On 10/28/17, Clement Boesch wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:38:11PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>>> >>
On 10/28/17, Clement Boesch wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 10/28/17, Clement Boesch wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:38:11PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>> >> Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 10/28/17, Clement Boesch wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:38:11PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> >> Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
> >> > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
>
On 10/28/17, Clement Boesch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:38:11PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
>> > ---
>> > libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 8
>> > 1 file changed,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:38:11PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> > ---
> > libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 8
> > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> Nack.
>
> ./ffmpeg_g -lavfi
On 10/28/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> Why?
>
> Because it is wrong. I wrote the test case by looking at your changes
> and finding a flaw in them.
No, your test is flawed. I have no longer obligations to communicate with
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Why?
Because it is wrong. I wrote the test case by looking at your changes
and finding a flaw in them.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel
On 10/28/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> testsrc2 hangs here.
>
> So please rework your patch.
Why? When it hangs without using tile filter at all.
Do I need to write things out of blue moon now?
Le septidi 7 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> testsrc2 hangs here.
So please rework your patch.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On 10/27/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
>> ---
>> libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 8
>> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> Nack.
>
> ./ffmpeg_g -lavfi
Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
Nack.
./ffmpeg_g -lavfi testsrc2=s=2x2,tile=65536x65536,scale=1024x1024 -f framecrc -
hangs instead of
On 10/27/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a ecrit :
>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
>> ---
>> libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 12 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Nack.
>
> This:
>
>
Le sextidi 6 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_tile.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Nack.
This:
./ffmpeg_g -lavfi testsrc2=s=1024x32,tile=layout=65x1 -f framecrc -
used to
23 matches
Mail list logo