On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floati
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs F
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>>
>> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C
On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>
> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf,
> fmin, fminf functions. This patch adds them,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> >> functions is beneficial, in
Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes:
> > Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> >> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
> >
> > Please provide actual numbers for this patch.
>
> For a change, why do
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> >> functions is beneficial, in t
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>>> functions is beneficial, in the contex
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes:
>
>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>
> Please provide actual numbers for this patch.
For a change, wh
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>>
>> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>
> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf,
> fmin, fminf functions. Thi
Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes:
> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
Please provide actual numbers for this patch.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing l
12 matches
Mail list logo
