Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> > On 16 Apr 2024, at 14:30, B-2014 Ariyan Kashyap > wrote: > > Getting this err while running ./configure --enable-shared > > ./configure --enable-shared > nasm/yasm not found or too old. Use --disable-x86asm for a crippled build. > Install a recent version of nasm. Def > If you

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Getting this err while running ./configure --enable-shared ./configure --enable-shared nasm/yasm not found or too old. Use --disable-x86asm for a crippled build. If you think configure made a mistake, make sure you are using the latest version from Git. If the latest version fails, report the

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

I've attached the full error. Sorry. This webmail limits the length of messages. Error: "Found duplicated MOOV Atom. Skipped it" c:\1.mp4 contains chapters 1-16 c:\2.mp4 contains chapters 17-28 c:\3.mp4 contains chapters 29-38 c:\4.mp4 contains chapters 39-53 Only c:\1.mp4 gets processed. The

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

And also STOP putting logs in attachments, put them in the body of the message. z! ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:55:32 +0800, jie chen wrote: > >but some rtmp were stop > >The log is in the attachment STOP posting questions without a subject! -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html#overlay-1 39.177.2 Examples Chain several overlays in cascade I want to combine several videos using this ffmpeg \ -rw_timeout 6000 -re -r 15 -i "rtmp:// 10.154.39.14:1935/live/rfBd56ti2SMtYvSgD5xAV0YU99zampta7Z7S575KLkIZ9PYk" \ -rw_timeout 6000 -re -r

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 5/31/2022 4:11 AM, Shazly Sayed wrote: Can you help me summarize what is required and help not to repeat mistakes again, and thank you for your patience with us If you don't actually state a problem, no one can help with it. We don't know what you're trying to to, how you've tried, and

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

moron you recently sent already a pointless mail without a subject - if you are not able to tell anybody what you are talking about you won#t get help Am 31.05.22 um 13:11 schrieb Shazly Sayed: Can you help me summarize what is required and help not to repeat mistakes again, and thank you for

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Can you help me summarize what is required and help not to repeat mistakes again, and thank you for your patience with us ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 29.05.22 um 00:28 schrieb Shazly Sayed: I can't merge what to do and nobody can't undestand what you want your dumb subject "(no subject)" don't help _______ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listi

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

I can't merge what to do ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 24.05.22 um 04:08 schrieb Shazly Sayed: Are there any other messages or instructions that I need to follow? yes: start using subjects in your mails and state wthat you are talking about at all ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 5/23/2022 7:08 PM, Shazly Sayed wrote: Are there any other messages or instructions that I need to follow? About what? z! ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Are there any other messages or instructions that I need to follow? ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hi, I have been publishing a screen to AWS IVS and AWS medialive by using ffmpeg. Now, needed to package 1 video + 4 audios which flv or rtmp protocol doesn't support. I can package 4a+1v into mp4 but rtmp doesn't support that if I am not wrong. What container format and protocol should I use if

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

ffmpeg has the option to split file based on time. Say starting with time t and go for length l. I am thinking of basically computing the time windows which will result in the desired file size. Say a 1 min video of 20 MB will need to be split in parts roughly 6 sec each. Is there an option to

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> I am running this command [snip] Is there any way to limit this speed to a > standard 1x? Adding -re in the input stage of the command. ffmpeg -re -vaapi_device and so on. Cheers Alex ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

t; > > Add the realtime filter to your filter chain, right before crop. So you'd > have -vf "realtime,crop..." etc > > > > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listin

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, 03:14 owen s, wrote: > I am running this command > > ffmpeg-git -y \ > -vaapi_device /dev/dri/renderD128 \ > -framerate 60 -i ./image.jpg \ > -stream_loop -1 -i ./audio.mp3 \ > -map 0:v \ > -c:v h264_vaapi \ > -vf > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 26.01.2021 um 01:09 schrieb owen s: I am running this command ffmpeg-git -y \ -vaapi_device /dev/dri/renderD128 \ -framerate 60 -i ./image.jpg \ -stream_loop -1 -i ./audio.mp3 \ -map 0:v \ -c:v h264_vaapi \ -vf

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

get, the more sure of it I become. > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 01/25/2021 07:09 PM, owen s wrote: I am running this command ffmpeg-git -y \ -vaapi_device /dev/dri/renderD128 \ -framerate 60 -i ./image.jpg \ -stream_loop -1 -i ./audio.mp3 \ -map 0:v \ -c:v h264_vaapi \ -vf

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

I am running this command ffmpeg-git -y \ -vaapi_device /dev/dri/renderD128 \ -framerate 60 -i ./image.jpg \ -stream_loop -1 -i ./audio.mp3 \ -map 0:v \ -c:v h264_vaapi \ -vf 'crop=2560:1440:0:0,format=nv12|vaapi,hwupload,loop=loop=-1:size=1:start=0,hwdownload,format=yuv420p' \ -rc_mode 2 -b:v

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hello, When running the following command: ``` ffmpeg \ -loop 1 -framerate 30 -t 1.4 -i /assets/img/filler640480.jpg -i 0d.mp4 - y \ -loop 1 -framerate 30 -t 891.113 -i /assets/img/filler640480.jpg -i 9f.mp4 -y \ -f lavfi -t 0.1 -i anullsrc=channel_layout=mono:sample_rate=48000 \ -filter_complex

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 02.11.20 um 00:09 schrieb juan carlos rebate: On Windows, you normally don't care about a dynamic compile as no incompatible C library should exist in which perfect world? other than on proper operating systems with package managers and dependencies you even can end in one installer

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am Mo., 2. Nov. 2020 um 00:09 Uhr schrieb juan carlos rebate : > The options that I indicate are listed in the configure file, No. > if it does not make sense for what is included ? Most of the options never make sense. > what would be the correct combination that includes free and non-free >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Enviado desde Correo para Windows 10 De: Carl Eugen Hoyos Enviado: domingo, 1 de noviembre de 2020 23:27 Para: FFmpeg user questions Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) Am So., 1. Nov. 2020 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb juan carlos rebate : > Actually my way of compiling is simpler but as it

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am So., 1. Nov. 2020 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb juan carlos rebate : > Actually my way of compiling is simpler but as it did not work in windows I > looked > in google for some way to do it and I came up with a tutorial, my way that I > have > been using since ffmpeg 2.4.4 is this; > ./configure

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Enviado desde Correo para Windows 10 De: Carl Eugen Hoyos Enviado: domingo, 1 de noviembre de 2020 21:14 Para: FFmpeg user questions Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) Am So., 1. Nov. 2020 um 19:49 Uhr schrieb juan carlos rebate : > Good afternoon, sorry that it took so long to upd

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am So., 1. Nov. 2020 um 21:14 Uhr schrieb Edward Park : > > ./configure > > --arch=x86_64 > > --target-os=mingw32 > > --cross-prefix=x86_64-w64-mingw32- > Does that automatically cross-compile with just make? > I thought you would need to add --enable-cross-compile. No, --cross-prefix is

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hi, > Good afternoon, sorry that it took so long to update this thread, well I am > still trying to use uar ffmpeg in my own way, but it seems that everything is > going against me, now the problem is that if I try to compile in windows the > process seems to be it carries out but then it

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am So., 1. Nov. 2020 um 19:49 Uhr schrieb juan carlos rebate : > Good afternoon, sorry that it took so long to update this thread, well I am > still trying > to use uar ffmpeg in my own way, but it seems that everything is going > against me, > now the problem is that if I try to compile in

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am Mo., 26. Okt. 2020 um 06:44 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig : > > On 10/25/2020 10:14 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: > > However if you compile two separate versions > > there would be no licensing issue if you share it, would it? > > If you "share" the build, then technically you're distributing it.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Enviado desde Correo para Windows 10 De: Carl Zwanzig Enviado: martes, 27 de octubre de 2020 0:35 Para: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) On 10/26/2020 4:22 PM, juan carlos rebate wrote: > It is not my intention to do top posting, this is because I do not l

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

or use a serious client if it's too hard to compose a message properly what exactly do you like so much - that are basics i bet it also can do better than "(no subject)" _______ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.o

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 10/26/2020 4:22 PM, juan carlos rebate wrote: It is not my intention to do top posting, this is because I do not like to use mail apps, I like the graphical interface web, and this does not have options to avoid it Yes it does, I do that all the time, both in the android app and in a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

It is not my intention to do top posting, this is because I do not like to use mail apps, I like the graphical interface web, and this does not have options to avoid it De: Carl Zwanzig Enviado: lunes, 26 de octubre de 2020 6:44 Para: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 10/25/2020 10:14 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: However if you compile two separate versions there would be no licensing issue if you share it, would it? If you "share" the build, then technically you're distributing it. The one that's GPL only is perfectly fine to share (following the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

_ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 10/25/2020 9:16 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: my question is derived from the license problem that does not allow gpl codecs together with non-free codecs I may be mistaken, but as I understand the GPL, if you're not distributing anything (building for your own use), there are no license

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

able-nonfree is not specified. > how can I use both combinations? thanks > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ff

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hello, I am still engrossed in the previous topic of the screenshot, if I got it to work thanks to your help but I do not get the optimal quality results, this leads me to the conclusion that there is some option not available in the compilation, so I I decided to compile it from source, but as I

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hi, I have a video with 45 minutes duration. This video contains 2-5 breaks. Each break time lasts 10 seconds. At this time, the screen is completely black. But, we can see a watermark and time code clearly. So I want to get; 1. The start and end time of this black screen break. 2. The time code

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hello, I'm trying to use ffmpeg to record the computer screen and also audio from microfone. Googling I found a lot of "how to". Although I can now record, I do have a few questions (3): 1) Using command $ ffmpeg -thread_queue_size 512 -f alsa -ac 2 -ar 44100 -i hw:0,0 -video_size 1024x768

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hi everyone, > can j download video from straming video site that are DRm protected ? > thanks ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 10:01 Uhr schrieb Tajti Krisztian : > I have an issue where I start merging video and audio > and my mac will render it for a long time and also the file size > does not match the sum of the video and audio. > I tried it on a pc and it does it in one second (without

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hi, I have an issue where I start merging video and audio and my mac will render it for a long time and also the file size does not match the sum of the video and audio. I tried it on a pc and it does it in one second (without rendering), and the file size is the sum of the audio and video file.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> Am 08.03.2020 um 08:23 schrieb ASHIM TOM : > > Why is ffplay binary is not getting compiled? Why do you send emails without a subject? Why are you not showing us your configure line? You have to install the sdl2 development package. Carl Eugen

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Why is ffplay binary is not getting compiled? Only ffmpeg and ffprobe are compiled I used the official repo to build ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

e, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am Sa., 24. Aug. 2019 um 00:16 Uhr schrieb Michael Castellon : > > FFmpeg users, please you help. > > ffplay -devices ffplay uses sdl for output, none of the FFmpeg "devices". Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

FFmpeg users, please you help. ffplay -devices Devices: D. = Demuxing supported .E = Muxing supported -- DE alsaALSA audio output DE fbdev Linux framebuffer D lavfi Libavfilter virtual input device DE oss OSS (Open Sound System) playback E

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

hi! i need to know if ffmpeg.exe uses Gpu or cpu when we use it to convert video to number of images? ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Has anyone managed to capture a feed using the "USB Capture SDI 4k" from Magewell with ffmpeg? It runs for awhile but then a 0 byte packet comes along and ffmped just stops. It doesn't quit, but the frame number just stops and it doesn't do anything after rhis. I saw 2 bugs from 2014 and both

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-09-13 18:32 GMT+02:00, Peter Gusev : > Video plays back correctly color-wise and size-wise. However > it "scrolls" vertically all the time Does this also happen if you only use ffplay? $ ffplay -f avfoundation -framerate 25 -pixel_format uyvy422 -i "0" Please test current FFmpeg git head.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-08-01 17:35 GMT+02:00, juan carlos rebate : > How could I edit video without reconverting this video? For example, > add a watermark This is (generally) impossible and not related to FFmpeg. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 01.08.2018 um 17:35 schrieb juan carlos rebate: > How could I edit video without reconverting this video? For example, add a > watermark, or delete a frame and that the format and quality do not change. > The commands -c copy or -vcodec and -acodec copy does not have the desired > effect,

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

How could I edit video without reconverting this video? For example, add a watermark, or delete a frame and that the format and quality do not change. The commands -c copy or -vcodec and -acodec copy does not have the desired effect, although these commands supposedly are for that the result is

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 20:46:44 +0100, Anthony Griffiths wrote: > re-stream this to ffserver (on the same machine) using > ffmpeg-0.10.16-1.el6.x86_64 that I installed with yum. Sorry, this version is *extremely* outdated. It was last maintained three years ago, presumably just with security

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

I have a live video stream on a centos 6 server that can be viewed at http://198.91.92.112:90/mobile/index.m3u8 using nginx and I'm trying to re-stream this to ffserver (on the same machine) using ffmpeg-0.10.16-1.el6.x86_64 that I installed with yum. The output video from ffmpeg can be viewed at

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Monday, April 17, 2017 6:22:18 AM CDT Erik Slagter wrote: > > according to mp4box tutorials that I have read about making mpeg-dash, I > > know that I have to set keyint and minkey int equal and also related to > > segment duration. so I tries using min-keyint=100, but the result video > > had

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 17-04-17 13:25, negin tebyani wrote: >> Do the tutorials also explain why you would ever want to use a braindead >> (!) fixed gop size in the first place? >> >> I could imagine a requirement for a closed gop type, but really not why >> you'd want to be gop's always exactly the same length,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

mp4box group has said that gop length has to be fixed and the same lengh for input videos, otherwise the dash video will not play well. > Do the tutorials also explain why you would ever want to use a braindead > (!) fixed gop size in the first place? > > I could imagine a requirement for a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

according to mp4box tutorials that I have read about making mpeg-dash, I know that I have to set keyint and minkey int equal and also related to segment duration. so I tries using min-keyint=100, but the result video had the min-keyint=51 Do the tutorials also explain why you would ever want to

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

I have two videos that I encoded them with ffmpeg, like: ffmpeg -i 1_med.mp4 -movflags faststart -c:v libx264 -x264opts 'keyint=100:min-keyint=25:no-scenecut:8x8dct:sliced-threads=0' -deblock 1:1 -flags +loop -b:v 850k -maxrate 850k -bufsize 2000k -nal-hrd cbr -vf

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > That's "manners," you insolent prick. Thank you for correcting me, as you probably assumed, I am not a native speaker. [...] > Please be aware that you are tolerated for your technical > knowledge That surprises me very much given that among all

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Moritz Barsnick gmx.net> writes: > With that very old version of ffmpeg, he would have to, > as it doesn't support "-to". Which imo makes the whole try to support the OP less helpful, sorry. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 24 Jul 2016 6:09 p.m., "Phil Rhodes" wrote: > > I have also criticised Carl Eugen when he's been >rude, which even his greatest admirer would have to >admit is something he does almost constantly. With all due respect, would it not be bright and better idea to take

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 18:16:14 +0200, Cley Faye wrote: > of your input might change. The "-t" option allows you to specify a > duration instead of a timestamp if this is an issue. With that very old version of ffmpeg, he would have to, as it doesn't support "-to". ;-) > If I'm not wrong, your

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> you are trolling over years here This is not true. I have pointed out problems with some of the basic video engineering in ffmpeg.  I have also criticised Carl Eugen when he's been rude, which even his greatest admirer would have to admit is something he does almost constantly. I'm not here to

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 24.07.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Phil Rhodes: Please understand that this has changed now, you are not> allowed anymore to speak open on our mailing lists, you > have to suppress you arrogant manors. That's "manners," you insolent prick. But in any case, the idea that I'm going to accept

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 24 Jul 2016 5:51 p.m., "Nicolas George" wrote: > > Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit : > > (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder.. > > That means your spam filter does its job. I know! Though there *was* an intentional double

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> Please understand that this has changed now, you are not> allowed anymore to >speak open on our mailing lists, you > have to suppress you arrogant manors. That's "manners," you insolent prick. But in any case, the idea that I'm going to accept advice from you on good behaviour is hilarious.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 24.07.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Nicolas George: Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit : (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder.. That means your spam filter does its job or it does an d the yahoo server which randomly was used for that message was

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit : > (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder.. That means your spam filter does its job. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > That's his problem - it's nothing to do with you. This is (unfortunately!) not correct: As you have pointed out, I give support to users on this mailing list. Where I live, I may be made responsible for not telling users that they are using (old)

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 24 Jul 2016 5:30 p.m., "Carl Eugen Hoyos" wrote: > > Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > > Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved > > in a discussion, simply ignore it. > > Yes, this is what I would honestly like you to do. > > But as I learned over the last

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> The version used by the OP has known security issues> and known bugs. Nobody >stepped forward over the last > years to continue support for it, so we do >know that > it actually is unsupported. That's his problem - it's nothing to do with you. If someone wants to ask a question here and

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > > As explained, this is not supported > Well, Carl Eugen, it may not be supported by you, It isn't. > but other people may be able to help. No. The version used by the OP has known security issues and known bugs. Nobody stepped forward over the last

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> As explained, this is not supported Well, Carl Eugen, it may not be supported by you, but other people may be able to help. Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved in a discussion, simply ignore it. -Phil ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 17:45 GMT+02:00 Walid Salman : > > [root@ns1 ~] > ​​ > # ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss > 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4 > > the server show this error : > > FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c)

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 24 Jul 2016 4:45 p.m., "Walid Salman" wrote: > I have an video and neet to split it, so I use this command : > > [root@ns1 ~]# ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss > 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4 > > the server show

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hello, I have an video and neet to split it, so I use this command : [root@ns1 ~]# ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4 the server show this error : FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On 7/15/16, Tim Hiles wrote: > Hi all, > > Seeing odd behavior with screen capture recorder. > > This always works on win 7. No problems. Even when resolution is set to > 1920 x 1080 > > c:\ffmpeg\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe -f dshow -i >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

"(no subject)" will attract many people and give a good future ressource in list-archives - what mail client allows that without aksing if you are serious and why don't you just compose a mail from top to bottom how others read and stop at "no subject"? why don't mailman reject such posts?

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Hi all, Seeing odd behavior with screen capture recorder. This always works on win 7. No problems. Even when resolution is set to 1920 x 1080 c:\ffmpeg\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe -f dshow -i video="screen-capture-recorder":audio="Microphone Array (Realtek High Definition Audio)" -vcodec libx264

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

Am 05.04.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Ivan Cacique: I'm having serious problems with the latest versions of ffmpeg with constants lockups Since ffmpeg-20160310-git-689211d-win64-static * no subject * no real problem description * just wow

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

I'm having serious problems with the latest versions of ffmpeg with constants lockups . Since ffmpeg-20160310-git-689211d-win64-static Ivan ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

Everyone is tired of the bickering in this thread (and stinks of another recent argurethread). If there are more similar replies I will set a moderation flag, and then your messsages will be stuck in the dank, bottomless pit of the mod queue. ___

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

Am 16.02.2016 um 21:13 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:46 PM, "Reindl Harald" pontificated: Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: I am not trying to "destroy" your ancient list software. If it's that fragile,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:46 PM, "Reindl Harald" pontificated: > Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: >> I am not trying to "destroy" your ancient list software. If it's that >> fragile, maybe it's time to retire it! > maybe you have noe

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: I am not trying to "destroy" your ancient list software. If it's that fragile, maybe it's time to retire it! maybe you have noe clue was threading means here you see it in reality:

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

problem to post plaintext? enhanced text messages? get a useable mailclient - press "reply to list" and that's it Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:16 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: why do you destroy a list-thread

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:16 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > why do you destroy a list-thread by compose a new message witout a > subject instead reply to the previous post? Sorry!!! Next time maybe I should not bother trying to thank someone for helping me! It

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

why do you destroy a list-thread by compose a new message witout a subject instead reply to the previous post? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

  On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:59:24 +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote:   >> pipe:///usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -loglevel fatal -i >> http://127.0.0.1:9981/stream/channelnumber/CHANNEL_NUMBER -c:v copy -c:s >> copy -c:d copy -c:t copy -filter_complex >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 16:03:02 -0700, Jim Worrall wrote: > Can you apply a bitstream filter when you are just copying the > stream? Yes, you can. A bitstream filter operates on a different level than encoding. > Wouldn’t that require transcoding? No. And it worked for the first 15 minutes...

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 14:57:42 -0500, Ming Luo wrote: > And if I trim the original 18 min video to 15 minutes, it works. To me this indicates that there is some error in the video stream which ffmpeg can't handle. Sorry, I don't know more than that (such as whether ffmpeg should handle that, or

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

> On 2015 Nov 21, at 12:57 PM, Ming Luo wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > I installed ffmpeg-2.8.2 on Mac and run in command line: > > ffmpeg -i firstTake.mp4 -vcodec copy -acodec copy -vbsf h264_mp4toannexb > firstTake.ts > > and get the following result with some errors. For

  1   2   >