Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
There's another consideration: The telecine=pattern=5+pp=linblenddeint version is 30% smaller than the straight minterpolate version. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
OOPS, that was a typo... You obviously see what I'm trying to do. Simply pp=linblenddeint'ing the combed frame works pretty damn well -- there's only 1 combed frame in a set of 6 frames. should have been: "in a set of 5 frames." a single, 1/60th-second combed frame every 1/12th second is

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 01/21/2021 09:04 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:34 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 01/21/2021 07:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < markfili...@bog.us> wrote: On 01/21/2021 07:31 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:34 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 01/21/2021 07:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > markfili...@bog.us> > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/21/2021 07:31 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 01/21/2021 07:53 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:31 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < markfili...@bog.us> wrote: On

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 01/21/2021 07:54 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 01/21/2021 07:31 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < markfili...@bog.us> wrote: On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Wed,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 01/21/2021 07:31 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > markfili...@bog.us> > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:31 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) > wrote: > >> On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < >> markfili...@bog.us> >> > wrote: >> >> On 01/20/2021 06:17

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 01/21/2021 07:31 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < markfili...@bog.us> wrote: On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Motion

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:51 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > markfili...@bog.us> > > wrote: > >> On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>> Motion compensation does not work that

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 01/20/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Motion compensation does not work that way. Thank you, Paul. Yes, I knew that. I'm not seeking motion compensation. Kindly reread my filter

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-20 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:45 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Motion compensation does not work that way. > > Thank you, Paul. Yes, I knew that. I'm not seeking motion compensation. > Kindly reread my filter > features and suggest what comes

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-20 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 01/20/2021 06:17 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Motion compensation does not work that way. Thank you, Paul. Yes, I knew that. I'm not seeking motion compensation. Kindly reread my filter features and suggest what comes closest. What I seek simply works on pixels. I'm relying on your experience

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-20 Thread Paul B Mahol
Motion compensation does not work that way. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:45 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > Hello All, > > I seek a decomb filter that operates on H/2 number of line pairs: lines i > & i+1 (where i=0..H/2-1), > by aligning edges in the two lines at x = delta-x(edge)/2 (i.e. the >

[FFmpeg-user] Seeking smart decomb filter

2021-01-19 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
Hello All, I seek a decomb filter that operates on H/2 number of line pairs: lines i & i+1 (where i=0..H/2-1), by aligning edges in the two lines at x = delta-x(edge)/2 (i.e. the median). The ideal filter would differentiate overall motion due to panning versus local motion due to local object