Hello,
I'm new to this mailing list.
I have posted a question on stackoverflow here, outlining more of what is
happening with my experiment.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58262560/how-to-fix-video-in-gallery-from-not-playing-probable-cause-encoding-from-ffmpe
Suffice to say, I'm trying
> What is the point of doing this calculation?
I need to trim 1.001 seconds
> It’s probably because flac is mostly a stream format, and you’re doing a
> stream copy. Re-encoding should fix all of this, it’s relatively inexpensive,
> > and it’s lossless after all, but if you really don’t want
On 2019-10-06 12:38, Felix Muster via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> Can you please explain me this difference:
>
>
>
> I have an audio-stream from a blu-ray (23.976 fps).
>
> When I calculate the duration it should be: 133799/(24000/1001) =
> 5580.533292 seconds.
> à 01:33:00.70 =
Hello
Can you please explain me this difference:
I have an audio-stream from a blu-ray (23.976 fps).
When I calculate the duration it should be: 133799/(24000/1001) =
5580.533292 seconds.
When I encode the extracted audio stream it is:
_ffmpeg -i _audio2.flac -f null -
ffmpeg
Now I'm confused
From my calculation:
Audio length: 5580.7 seconds
Video length: 133799/(24000/1001) = 5580.533292 seconds
From the container:
Audio length: 5580.704 --> that is what ffmpeg tell me when I reencode the
stream
Video length: 5580.575 --> Adobe Premiere Pro showed me 133799 frames,