Now I'm confused
From my calculation:
Audio length: 5580.7 seconds
Video length: 133799/(24000/1001) = 5580.533292 seconds
From the container:
Audio length: 5580.704 --> that is what ffmpeg tell me when I reencode the
stream
Video length: 5580.575 --> Adobe Premiere Pro showed me 133799 frames, but the
container metadata 133800/(24000/1001) = 5580,575. Don't know why there is a
difference ...
And all audio streams of the blu-ray have an different duration:
English: 5580.704
Swedish: 5580.694
But this difference is only in the end, or not?
> Where did you get the original length from? Is "133799" the number of video
> frames in the file? Does the audio track start at the same time as the video
> track? Is it the same length as the video track? At least on a DVD the
> asnwer to the the last > 2 question is not guaranteed to be "yes".
133799 is the total frame number Premiere told me. I don't know if it start at
the same time, I think so, otherwise it would be out of sync.
> Are you claiming you have corrected for both of those by trimming samples off
> in some program?
I didn't touch the stream only extracted from mkv which I've passthrough ripped
from blu-ray disc.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".