For anyone interested in downloading David Yip's Dustbuster program
which I mentioned in a recent posting, it can be found at:
www.geocities.com/dcw_yip/DustBuster
Art
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
Hi
I have a Polaroid sprintscan 120; it must be about 2 years old. It has
had quite constant use during that time - perhaps being operated 2-3
times a week. Last week it developed a dark line/patch running the
length of the frame. This is most noticeable in blue skies; I rescanned
some earlier
Hi Craig,
As far as I know, Polaroid themselves still offer support on the 120.
I too have one and spoke with their support people about 2 months ago and as
of then they were still offering support.
http://www.polaroid.com/company_info/ww_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=84552
The Canon scans
still seems slightly sharper, but with a few levels of sharpening on
PS, there is no real difference. I am quite fussy about the sharpness
of my slides and the test slide I chose is very sharp under a 10x
loupe. Maybe I should try the manual focus thing on the Minolta?
I've
Jerry Hadam wrote:
I have been a little reluctant to convert to a new digital body because
of
the low light capabilities (or incapabilities of the digital bodies. Just
haven't seen anyone pull off the look of high speed film in a digi.
I shoot loads of Fuji 800 and Tmax 3200 (rate at 1600).
patton paul wrote:
Are my worries about possible incompatibilities warrented? Am I safer in
this regard to stick with a SCSI card? Is it likely
that a SCSI to firewire converter would be compatible with Linux?
I've had no trouble at all getting Advansys PCI SCSI cards to work with
Mandrake
Tony wrote:
Hah, me too - only I changed to Delta3200 (@1600) eventually. Well, the
10d is amazing in bad light. Shortly after I got it, I was walking back
from a job and did some handheld night street shots @800 which alerted me
to the potential for seeing in the dark. It has since got me
I suspect I will 'go digital' sometime in the next year or two. My question
regards what type of print output quality I can expect from digital.
I print on an Epson 2200 at sizes of up to 13x19 inches. In reality, I tend
to leave an inch margin or so around the image, so lets say an image size
I've never seen one ~2' and I believe length
is electrically critical.
I have several that are 6' in length. the length that is electrically
critical is the total lenght of any daisy chain from controller to the last
device no matter how many devices are in the daisy chain. The total length
is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I print on an Epson 2200 at sizes of up to 13x19 inches. In
reality, I tend
to leave an inch margin or so around the image, so lets say an
image size of
11x17 inches. Conventional teaching with scans (and I suppose that this
could be part of the answer..that the
The idea that you won't have grain is somewhat misleading. When you
upsize to 11x17, you will have the equiv of grain in the form of digital
artifacts. At even 8x10, I can tell the difference between a 35mm film
image and a 6mpixel Camera, and it is even more obvious at 11x17.
Realistically, a
Karl,
Realistically, a 6mPixel camera is equiv to 4000dpi scan of 35mm film.
Where on earth do you get that idea? Basicall, your claim is simply not
even close.
Regards,
Austin
Unsubscribe by mail to
From: KARL SCHULMEISTERS
Realistically, a 6mPixel camera is equiv to 4000dpi scan of 35mm film.
Which generates some amazing images, but still doesn't quite
match film when you enlarge it.
4000dpi comes out to about 4K by 6K, or 24M. A 6Mp camera is closer to a
2700dpi scanner.
Save your
13 matches
Mail list logo
