Other things being equal, are there any advantages
in output to scanning BW negs as Image in Vuescan to scanning them as B/W
Negative.
Chris
I'm curious to know if those who scan and print
35mm negs --using a 3600 dpi scanner and above --typically sharpen their
scanned images before printing. Also, do drum scans require less
sharpening?
Chris Hargens
I've had good results using Vuescan with my SS4000 with a minimum of
tweaking -- I usually use the default options. Sure, the help guide is a bit
opaque, but the software engine itself is high quality and worth the small
payment.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Stephens [EMAIL
Any suggestions for removing water spots on
film? I've tried Ethol's antistatic film cleaner. It did reduce the stains -- so
it helps a bit -- but if something more effective is available I'd like to hear
about it. How about Pec 12? I've also heard that rewashing film in developer can
help
When using Vuescan (with SS4000), I notice that I
do not get a crop file if I uncheck the raw compression box. Is this supposed to
happen and, if so, why?
Also, is it customary to work with the cropped
files rather than the raw files?
Chris
.
Chris
- Original Message -
From:
Chris Hargens
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:19
PM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan - crop
files missing
When using Vuescan (with SS4000), I notice that I
do not get a crop file if I uncheck the raw
tab has options for outputting a TIFF file
either compressed or uncompressed, a JPEG file, and a raw file.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hargens
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:19 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan - crop files missing
When using
uggestions/answers to these questions will be very much appreciated. Oh, and
I'm sure I'll have a few more...
Chris Hargens
. (BTW, anyone
have any experiences to share about Mack service agreements?) Anyway, I'm about
to take the plunge, and right now, at the last minute, before I press the "Buy
Now" button, I would appreciate any feedback, opinions, orexperience the
people on this list would be willing to off
Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epson-inkjet/
- Original Message -
From: Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filmscanners@Halftone. Co. Uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 5:35 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Inkjet Printer List?
Can anyone point me to a good/active mailing
Bankruptcy doesn't entail an end to service agreements, etc. It merely puts
creditors on hold.
True, one would like to deal with a company that is solid financially. I
think Polaroid will probably make some radical cuts -- the usual get lean
and mean approach. I've also hear that the company
I hope some good reviews come out, otherwise I'll probably opt for the
SprintScan 4000. It's price has gone down and it's bundled with SilverFast.
Also,overall, I've heard good things about Polaroid's customer service.
Finally, I'm not sure that NOT having an onboard dust and scratch removal
I'm waiting to see the price and response to the new Canon FS4000US, which
will be coming out sometime this month or early next month. The street price
is supposed to be around $1099,00, and it has dust and scratch removal. Who
knows, perhaps it will drive the price of other scanners down.
Chris
So I hear that ICE does not remove dust and scratches from
black and white film. I'm planning on buying the new Canon FS4000US when it
comes out (assuming I don't hear any horror stories). Does anyone know if it's
FARE dustscratch removal technology will have the same limitation?
Chris
If you click on
http://yourphotos.ssdonline.com/vendor_result.cfm?manufacturer=Canoncategor
yid=5cfid=453757cftoken=255739
you'll note that an ETA of 3/30/01 is given under the availability heading.
Since Canon has not listed the scanner yet in its product list, I assume
it's not out yet. I've
The following was posted on the digital-finearts (Yahoo) list. You may find
it of interest.
(Re: [digital-fineart] Report from Seybold)
There is a Photoshop plugin available now that helps to reduce grain and
digital noise. It is called Quantum Mechanic Lite, and I have used it
with some
Someone on photo.net gave me this URL for info
on the new Canon scanner. From the specs and expected price, it sound like this
new scanner will give Nikon and Polaroid a run for the money.
Chris
-Original Message-From:
Chris Hargens [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sorry,
forgot to include the URL -- http://www.usa.canon.com/press/021201e.html
-Original Message-From:
Chris Hargens [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date:
Sunday, April 01, 2001 8:18 PMSubject: Re: filmscanners: Canon
4000 dpi scanner
Someone
On the photo.net web site I read a discussion
(http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001JxX)
in which a couple of people mentioned a new Canon 4000 dpi scanner that should
be coming out soon, priced at about $1,100. I looked on the Canon web site for
information and found
Although I don't agree with most of what Dicky (who invented that name?)
says, claims, asserts, so on, I do find it entertaining in its over-the-top
excessiveness. I guess I just don't take him seriously (or personally) --
or perhaps I experience him as an entertainer. Even the the "bad" words
or example, is the usual
image size for a print on A4 paper? Does it vary much?
Chris Hargens
-Original Message-
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..
On M
Thanks everyone for the quick and specific replies.
Chris Hargens
-Original Message-
From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..
With 50 messages still
."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Hargens
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 6:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: OT messages OTquestions.
Perhaps OT messages could be revised in the subject title -- instea
will and a desire
to help.
Chris Hargens
-Original Message-
From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:38 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Sorting OT mail
I don't believe that's true. Like Tony says, the man has to take a break
every now
Larry,
Thanks for the links. Interesting discussion.
--Chris
-Original Message-
From: Larry Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: filmscanners: OT - More about Jay Maisel
Here are two of the links we came
I agree. I'm not especially interested in reading about the intricacies of
copyrights right now (perhaps later and with a sense of urgency), but I
would like to read more comments about Jay Maisel.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Eli Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Ethol sells an anti-static film cleaner. I use it on my negatives and get
good results. I'm not sure how effective it would be with glass negatives,
but it is gentle and evaporates cleanly. For scratches or water residue
stains/deposits, I've found Edwal's No Scratch to be effective. It works
27 matches
Mail list logo
