I just released VueScan 7.1.19 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.19
* Added USB support for Microtek X12USL, 4700, 8700
* Added FireWire support for Microtek and Polaroid scanners
* Fixed bugs
In a message dated 10/1/2001 8:34:17 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will you bring the brightness option back, please?
I've modified VueScan 7.1.19 so the Gamma option works like
the old brightness option. For instance, if you used to set
gamma to 2.2 and brightness to 1.5, set gamma to
In a message dated 10/4/2001 8:39:46 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a Mac Silver G4 733Mhz with Microtek 8700 and OS 9.2.1; I have
installed the latest version of VueScan, just out today (7.1.19);
You need Mac OS X 10.1 to use VueScan with FireWire scanners.
You might try hooking
I just got confirmation from someone with a SprintScan 4000+
that VueScan 7.1.19 works perfectly (his words) with it.
Is there anyone with a SprintScan 120 who could do a test
with VueScan 7.1.19? I have a hunch that the same fix I
made for the SprintScan 4000+ will make it work with the
In a message dated 10/4/2001 1:51:23 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So Ed, the regular Elite doesn't supported either ?
VueScan works nicely with the regular Minolta Scan Elite.
I can probably get VueScan working with the Elite II with
a few hours work, but I'd need to either have a loaner
In a message dated 10/3/2001 1:11:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://schmode.net/vuescan.jpg is a 337 dpi Vuescan scan of a tiger in
Hagenbeck Zoo, Hamburg (Germany) using the settings to be seen in
http://schmode.net/settings.jpg; most important amongst them are white
balance as
In a message dated 9/30/2001 11:52:18 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yesterday I was experimenting with fill flash (still haven't gotten it
completely down yet) and decided to go w/neg film for it's extra latitude.
Kodak Royal Gold 100, to be exact. A bit contrasty, but I like it.
I just released VueScan 7.1.18 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.18
* Added Image|Flip command (and keyboard shortcut)
* Fixed problem with UMAX scanners
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 9/30/2001 9:38:01 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've played
with all the Vuescan settings for HOURS and HOURS, but I just can't seem to
get a nice, rich scan without dragging it in to Photoshop. I've also had
the same problems with over brightness, but have been
In a message dated 9/26/2001 2:40:53 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
However, I've never got round to asking Ed whether the
buffer value is b% or 2b% of the linear dimensions or b% of
the frame area.
For instance, if the width is 36mm and the percent is 10%, then
there is a buffer of
I just released VueScan 7.1.16 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.16
* Fixed problem with preview looking different from scan
* Enabled infared cleaning and restore colors in preview
* Improved
In a message dated 9/19/2001 6:55:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any suggestions? ISTM the only option is to do a preview which includes the
film mask, then switch to manual exposure, and keep that setting for the
rest of the film (or at least the strip).
Yes, this is exactly what
I got a bug report from someone using VueScan 7.1.14
on a Nikon LS-20, and I was wondering if anyone else
using either an LS-20 or LS-1000 has seen this bug.
The problem was that if a section of the image was
cropped on the right side of the preview and then
scanned, a section on the left side
I've just released VueScan7.1.13 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.13
* Significantly faster on Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux
* Added keyboard shortcuts for common functions
* User interface
In a message dated 9/4/2001 7:59:46 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VueScan already is beginning to support OS X, but I assume
that it will need a Polaroid driver to work from.
VueScan works fine on OS X with the SprintScan 4000
without any Polaroid drivers installed.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
If you have any preferences for the types of keyboard
shortcuts you'd like me to add to VueScan, please send
me e-mail with your suggestions (please don't clog up
this mailing list with these suggestions though).
I need to decide how to use the function keys, control-letter,
Alt-letter, and
In a message dated 9/4/2001 6:16:48 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a valid predictor. All 2 means is
to take the difference between adjacent pixel values before compressing.
I don't understand. If a predictor of 2 is invalid why would you
In a message dated 9/2/2001 11:50:14 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a quick note to point out that ACDSee will happily display 48 bit
images, and LZW compressed images, and the combination of those - 48 bit
LZW compressed TIFFs. I guess from what people have said that it will not
In a message dated 9/2/2001 10:19:26 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid
implementation I don't think that the three row CCD idea is something
that does not work in practice. It may or may not depending on how it
is
In a message dated 9/3/2001 4:37:59 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do both the Vuescan one row CCD scan and the NikonScan Fine scan produce a
lower quality scan than the three row CCD scan?
Quite the contrary - they both produce a higher quality scan than the
three row CCD scan, albeit a
In a message dated 9/2/2001 7:17:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know if the compression settings have changed. Only Ed can answer
that one. PSP gives an error I think about not being able to use a
predictor of 7 with 48bit depth.
VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a
In a message dated 9/2/2001 5:52:43 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To answer the
burning question, ICE degrades sharpness while VS IR filter does not, at
least on Kodak Max400.
Yes, this is how I designed VueScan's Infrared clean filter. It only
smooths the image in the neighborhood of
In a message dated 9/3/2001 1:49:15 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just got a new LS 4000. It works fine with Nikon Scan 3.1, but I really
want to use VS (prior experience with Polaroid SS4000). The Nikon doesn't
show up as a device, only disk in the popup.
You need Mac OS X 10.1 to
In a message dated 9/2/2001 12:28:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even with the controllable light source of the Nikon? I would have guessed
that they compensated for that by boosting the LED output, or are they not
individually controllable? Do you know how many LEDs there are, per
In a message dated 9/2/2001 3:57:22 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
check to see if the files being output by Vuescan are 48-bit instead
of 24. I don't know about ACDSee, but many graphics apps can't cope with
48-bit files.
Yes, try changing to 24 bit RGB as well as turning off the
I just released VueScan 7.1.12 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.12
* Added splash screen on startup (Windows and Linux)
* Added support for Epson Perfection 1250, 1650 and 2450
* Added support
I just released VueScan 7.1.11 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and
Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.11
* Added support for Nikon LS-8000 (Windows and Mac OS X 10.1)
* Fixed problem with image smearing on Canon FS4000
* Fixed
In a message dated 8/30/2001 4:17:46 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dowmloaded Vuescan to try with our new G4 and Nikon LS4000 scanner.
Vuescan cannot find the scanner (neither in 9.2 nor X). Am I doing
something wrong.
You need Mac OS X 10.1 to use FireWire scanners with VueScan
I've got a test version of VueScan that works with the
Nikon LS-8000. I hope to release it in the next day
or so, but it would be useful if anyone with an LS-8000
(on Windows) could test it. If you find anything that
needs fixing, please let me know today.
It can be downloaded from:
In a message dated 8/6/2001 1:34:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed would be better answering this but AFAIK he has characterised the
scanners
which Vuescan supports and there is some sort of calibration going on.
I've done an IT8 calibration of every film scanner VueScan supports.
I just released VueScan 7.1.8 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.8
* Added support for Canon FS4000
* Improved support for Canon FS2700 and FS2710
* Added support for FireWire scanners on Mac OS X
I got a loaner FS4000US film scanner from Canon today,
and I also got the SDK I need from Apple to add support
for FireWire scanners on Mac OS X. When it rains,
it pours smile.
I've done a preliminary assessment of what it will take to
add support for the FS4000US to VueScan, and it doesn't
In a message dated 7/25/2001 1:03:22 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Improved color when scanning negatives on
SprintScan 4000
Might this mean the anomalous excess blue problem is now resolved?
Someone sent me a raw scan file that exhibited the excess blue
problem, and this
no honestly this is nuts. If I had a week to spare I could prototype a GUI
in RealBasic. There's nothing hard about it.
I agree - there's nothing hard about prototyping a GUI. The hard
part is making the subtle things work.
For instance, if I had two panes, I'd get dozens of e-mails a
day
I just released VueScan 7.1.7 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.7
* Improved white balance algorithm in scenes with
unnatural lighting or colors (i.e. sunsets or
scenes with mostly bright
In a message dated 7/24/2001 1:02:14 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed, this whole thread started because I was complaining about BUGS in the
interface, not the design per se.
I'm quite happy to fix bugs, and I add every bug that's reported
to my list of things to fix. Most of the
In a message dated 7/24/2001 2:46:23 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be nice to be able to use standard file dialog boxes to specify
both the directory and filename, but not at the expense of giving up auto
increment.
Now that I think of it, I could always count how many
In a message dated 7/23/2001 0:03:25 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's just two small items that really seem lacking to me and really slow
me down and frustrate me every time I use it.
1.) A browse for folder button to locate the folder to save files in.
You can already do
In a message dated 7/23/2001 1:41:15 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will be very interested to hear when VueScan will support
FireWire scanners running under MacOS X.
It looks like I now need to wait for Mac OS 10.1 before being able
to add FireWire support to OS X.
Regards,
Ed
In a message dated 7/23/2001 2:38:27 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as we're using up your programming time here Ed, why not a dual
monitor approach as well?
If I made the options one window, the preview another window and
the scan a third window, then this would work fine.
Moving the film via a carrier, which is likely molded plastic, with
plastic gearing, and also having it need to mesh' with the motorized
transport, and being that the carrier is prone to dust and dirt
attraction and the elements, makes it much harder to maintain
integrity of precision
In a message dated 7/23/2001 2:19:32 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sometime back Ed mentioned there was a SCSI command that causes an extra
20%
exposure on the scanwit and he enables it always.
I vaguely remember someone telling me that Acer claimed there
was a command that caused an
In a message dated 7/21/2001 1:46:59 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you yet gotten one of the new Canon 4000 ppi scanners to
include in VueScan?
Canon said they'd get me one next week.
In one of your earlier posts, you questioned
whether the unit uses 2 scans or one to do the
In a message dated 7/22/2001 6:19:56 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed has deliberately
integrated this into VS (rather than implementing it as a proper,
changeable profile) to stop people stealing it and using it in other
software.
Actually, the main reason I did it this way is
In a message dated 7/22/2001 6:19:26 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree, though I personally preferred the 2-pane approach.
I keep going back and forth on this myself. Most other scanner
software uses a 2-pane approach with the options and
buttons in one area and an image that's
In a message dated 7/21/2001 9:14:18 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have finally managed to catch VS red-handed WRT it's occasional excess
highlight blue in Superia 400 scans. I had thought this was an anomalous
behaviour to do with the films 4th layer response under some shooting
In a message dated 7/21/2001 5:14:06 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, Nikon LS2000 and LS30 and I suspect all the newer 35mm
models, at least, move the scanning unit (CCD, lens and lighting
source and any mirrors), and not the film.
Yes, every CoolScan Nikon scanner I've seen,
In a message dated 7/20/2001 2:58:04 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an Acer Scanwit 2740S, which
requires multiple passes to do a multiple scan. I thought that this
was the right thing to do to get lower noise when scanning at 16x. so
as to be able to average the input from
In a message dated 7/21/2001 12:29:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using a microswitch or an optical sensor to detect the
zero position is less accurate than the resolution of
most scanners, which makes multi-pass multi-scanning
impractical with these scanners.
I disagree.
In a message dated 7/20/2001 9:50:04 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Me too. Having a LS-30 I badly need Vuescan as it's the only way to extract
10 bits rather than 8, and it's really a waste of time having to make a
real
scan to check if the exposure is correct (no clipping at the high
In a message dated 7/20/2001 10:23:26 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because I frequently use the 16x multisample option and
always scan in 16-bit mode, this means I sometimes spend as much as an hour
on each image, which is a major PITA. Still, the results I get from it,
despite the
In a message dated 7/20/2001 12:25:52 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Actually this is what I experienced: BW film (TMax 100 or 400, don't
remember), auto-exposure, defaults settings: the histogram of the raw file
had almost nothing in the lower half. I rescanned with manual exposure and
I just released VueScan 7.1.5 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.5
* Added support for Acer 640UT transparency adapter
* Added color correction for SprintScan 45
* Added support for auto document
In a message dated 7/1/2001 4:03:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Vuescan definitely doesn't produce skintones that make me want to puke - but
at the same time I feel it produces results that are a little flat looking,
both in contrast and in colour.
Use sRGB and reduce Color|Gamma a
In a message dated 7/2/2001 8:05:14 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a Nikon LS3 and using NikonScan 3 and Vuescan have very similar
problems to what you describe.
I shot allot of backlit subjects and interiors where a light source is in
the picture. For this Nikon scan wins.
I just released VueScan 7.1.4 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.4
* Improved color fidelity when scanning film
* Fixed problem with Microtek ScanMaker V
* Fixed problem with using Nikon scanners
In a message dated 6/22/2001 1:36:55 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seconded! I was intrigued to find that the ICE feature was a binary
option. Earlier versions of Vuescan gave me the impression that it
was a variable effect.
Earlier versions basically limited the size of the largest
I just released VueScan 7.1.2 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.2
* Improved color and tone when scanning negatives
I'm pretty sure this fixes a lot of the problems people have
been seeing with
I just released VueScan 7.1.1 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1.1
* Fixed problem with infrared cleaning when border
included in scan
* Added support for calibration on Microtek scanners
*
In a message dated 6/18/2001 6:59:21 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you suggesting that the LS-40 represents better value (less resolution
and D-Max, but also less expensive), or that the differences in
resolution/D-Max are so small as to be insignificant, or that this scanner
has
In a message dated 6/17/2001 1:17:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to
NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less.
I have send MR Hamrick 3 test pictures scanned by NikonScan, VueScan and
In a message dated 6/17/2001 12:35:50 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This lurker is going to retire his old Scan Dual and has decided to go
with either the Coolscan IV or a Scan Elite due to budget
restrictions(there
seems to be a fire sale on Scan Elites right now). A used/refurb
I just released VueScan 7.1 for Windows, Linux and Mac OS 8/9/X.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.1
* Improved infrared cleaning to work with larger
dust spots
* Added separate options for infrared cleaning and
grain reduction
In a message dated 6/15/2001 2:01:59 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will this version work safely with the Polaroid SS 120--or is that
restriction still in place?
I'm pretty sure it won't hang up the SS 120, since I've disabled the
calibration that was causing the problem.
However, I've
If you have a SprintScan 120, I recommend you not use
VueScan 7.0.26 or 7.0.27 with it. I've gotten two reports
that VueScan kills the scanner, probably popping an internal
fuse.
I'm urgently releasing a version of VueScan that will
disable all commands to the SprintScan 120 until I can
get
In a message dated 6/12/2001 9:56:39 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, I have a Microtek 35t+ and it won't work with the Polaroid software.
I don't know if this means the Microtek software won't work with a Polaroid
scanner or not but I was told there is some firmware code that
In a message dated 6/10/2001 6:22:35 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Agfa is definitely softer,
no argument there, but when I apply unsharp masking to the Agfa scan
on the order of 75%, 0.8 radius, 0 threshold to the Agfa scan, which
is my normal amount to sharpen grain with the
In a message dated 6/9/2001 6:18:40 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just tried scanning a slide and outputting a colour TIFF and an IR one.
It was very educational. Any sort of mark, scratch or dust spot is utterly
black in the IR scan.
If you look closer, you'll see that the dust
In a message dated 6/8/2001 8:11:44 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember reading something in the Vuescan manual which
said something about 'making the image look as much like the original scene
as possible'. In other words, applying a inverse HD curve, presumably,
plus
a custom
In a message dated 6/10/2001 9:23:24 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
your design goal is to eliminate the specific characteristics of individual
emulsions???
The design goal is to reproduce the actual scene as much as
possible. Displaying the scene on a calibrated monitor should
look
In a message dated 6/10/2001 8:32:54 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've never done critical comparisons of resolution between
them, as they both resolve grain pretty well, and seem about the same
in terms of resolution.
It would be useful if you'd do a 2500 dpi and 2700 dpi scan of the
In a message dated 6/10/2001 9:38:28 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had 7.0.24 and it works well with my MAC
I just purchase and download 7.0. 26. Nothing happens, no scanner response.
It was a small problem with the slide adapter. It's fixed in
VueScan 7.0.27, which can be downloaded
In a message dated 6/10/2001 4:13:40 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The T-2500 scan (agfsnipVS) is a bit softer and flatter than the LS-30
scan (niksnipVS). After sharpening and correcting tone on both scans,
I thought the T-2500 scan rendered image detail slightly better than
the
In a message dated 6/9/2001 4:27:15 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Just curious but is any of Nikon's ICE code in firmware or is it all
contained in NikonScan?
It's a software algorithm in NikonScan. The scanner itself just
returns infrared data along with rgb data.
Regards,
Ed
In a message dated 6/8/2001 3:45:11 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My LS2000 (running on a beige G3 rev 1 desktop system 8.6 384 meg
ram) has just begun producing unsharp scans. The blurring seems
mostly to be in the direction of scanning (parallel to the long side)
sometimes the
In a message dated 6/7/2001 2:32:02 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Running my new 2740S with the latest VueScan, when I try multiple passes or
the extra-long IR scan, I see a ghost image displaced slight upwards.
Yes, the hardware in the ScanWit doesn't always accurately reposition
the
I've spent the past few days getting VueScan to work with the
Microtek X12USL. There was someone on this list who needed
this, but I lost their e-mail address. If you need a test version
of this, please let me know in a private e-mail.
I added a calibration function for all newer Microtek
In a message dated 6/8/2001 6:14:53 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not quite sure how to answer this assertion since it goes against
everything I've read and my own personal experience.
Don't believe everything you read (including what I write smile).
I guess all I
can say is scans on
In a message dated 6/8/2001 12:32:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been biting my tongue throughout this whole dust conversation but I
guess I am finally baited out. I have done actual scans on the scanner with
a LED light source and the SS4000. It was quite obvious to me that
In a message dated 6/5/2001 5:28:40 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you perhaps post an example of what the infrared scan looks like of
a typical image?
You can do this yourself by setting Files|TIFF file type to 16 bit
Infrared.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 6/5/2001 11:11:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I noticed a deep scratch in one of my negs, so I turned on Light Clean
in the Filter tab and scanned from Disk again.
The scratch disappeared.
Yes, this is what should happen.
So I suppose my question is: if Clean
In a message dated 6/6/2001 12:28:18 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have to defer to Ed's comment that Incompetence is more likely than
Malice--
I can't quote Ed's exact text because an International Conspiracy ate my
email-files! ;-)
I happen to live near Ockham, and have always
In a message dated 6/6/2001 4:07:36 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Hamrick wrote:
I happen to live near Ockham
Is that the same Ockham as the place William of Occam was born in?
Yes, it's just down the road from where I live. I need to get a picture
of me standing next to the
In a message dated 6/4/2001 10:38:06 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm guessing, but I would be surprised that the infrared light
scan would have very much noise artifacting in it.
The exact same CCD and A/D converter is used to scan the
image in infrared and visible light. The only
In a message dated 6/3/2001 10:55:46 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unlike Nikons, doesn't this scanner insist the IR channel scan
separately from the RGB scan ... ie, a 2nd pass. I thought the
original post was stating, if he wanted 16x RGB passes, it also
scanned the IR 16x. There
I just released VueScan 7.0.25 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.0.25
* Added support for Nikon SA-30 roll film adapter
* Fixed problem with HP 5300C firmware version 4.00
* Fixed problem with
In a message dated 5/29/2001 4:28:59 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is, unlike the actual
manufacturer, they are rarely supplied with enough replacement units to
be able to just make a decision to trade the broken model with a new
sealed or out of box model.
I think a
In a message dated 5/30/2001 1:08:12 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I have this exact same problem with my Minolta Scan Dual II. I can get to a
pretty good 'crop' image in Vuescan but the raw scans are generally very
washed out.
The raw scans are in gamma 1.0 space, not gamma 2.2 space
In a message dated 5/30/2001 1:00:54 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any ideas on how to *clean* that sucker? I'm not sure I even
know what it looks like (although there's a wide white stripe at the top of
the scanning unit).
The calibration stripe is usually a wide white stripe near
In a message dated 5/29/2001 12:22:18 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I just checked a frame with the problem in Miraphoto 2.0 and it exhibits
the
same yellow/brown cast down the right hand side on this sky negative. A
difference of up to 12 points blue.
Double-check that you don't
I just released VueScan 7.0.24 for Windows, Linux and Mac OS 8/9/X.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.0.24
* Improved support for 14-bit UMAX scanners
* Added support for varying CCD exposure time when using
transparency adapter on HP
I just released VueScan 7.0.23 for Windows, Linux and Mac OS 8/9/X.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.0.23
* Fixed problem with slide feeders on Nikon
LS-1000, LS-2000 and LS-4000
* Fixed problems with HP 5300C and HP 7400C
* Added
I just released VueScan 7.0.22 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.0.22
* Added full support for USB scanners on Mac OS X
* Improved memory usage on Mac OS X
* Added HP 7400C support for both CCD sensors
In a message dated 5/20/2001 6:16:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can the whole directory be moved to another drive?
Yes.
Is the code specifically
aware of the c: drive?
No.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 5/20/2001 2:19:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed, is there an easy way to add/modify this: have the install program let
the
user select which directory to install too?
Just install it and then rename c:\vuescan to something that
indicates the version number.
I just released VueScan 7.0.21 for Windows, Linux and
Mac OS 8.x, OS 9.x and OS X. I built two versions for
the Macintosh - one in CFM format (8.x/9.x) and one in
Mach-O format (OS X). The Mach-O version works with
many USB scanners on OS X. If you have a USB scanner
that's supported by
In a message dated 5/19/2001 7:05:01 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I the only one who has problems with the crop outline in Vuescan? I have
been wondering why it is so incredibly difficult to position correctly.
Try zooming into the image before dragging the crop outline. In
I just released VueScan 7.0.20 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
The Mac OS version now runs on Mac OS X (it's a
Carbon application) and also runs on Mac OS 8.x/9.x.
What's new in version 7.0.20
* Converted Mac OS version to run on
In a message dated 5/10/2001 3:20:02 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I scan an image containing black sky and bright stellar images with a
Nikon Coolscan IVED (=LS40) , then close to the edge of the field every
bright (saturated) stellar image has a faint ghost image separated from
In a message dated 5/8/2001 11:25:10 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was surprised by Jack Phipp's comments that Digital ICE does not work with
Kodachrome. I have used it with Kodachromes from the '50s to the early
'90s
when I switched, with great reluctance, to Fuji E6. On my
101 - 200 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
