My personal work flow is sort of like you suggest. I save the original as a
raw .tif or as a .psd and only use .jpg for the internet. If I am going to
save a working version of the image, I save that with GF as a .stn file.
However, my experiences with .jpg files has not been along the lines of
Is this a duplicate message? For some reason, I think I have already
replied to it once. Am I going crazy or is Tony's server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave King
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only if you change the quality when resaving the .jpg file or if you
resample the file in any way prior to resaving the .jpg file even at the
same quality level. With .tif files, you will lose information only if you
resample the file after opening it and before resaving it.
-Original
Each time there would be some generational loss.
Not necessarily true. If you open and close ( or resave) the compressed file
without changing the compression from one quality level to another in the
case of .jog or without resampling the image prior to closing or resaving
the file, there will
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:46:41 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
nor do I think
as there a full moon. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Sorry, drifting off topic.
Nev
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Hence, given the purpose that you would be using the inkjet pri
Tony,
This paper in all its formulations was first brought out and intended for
the 870/1270 printers and the new dye based inks that were in their chipped
cartridges and allegedly had greater lightfastness than the older dye based
inks used in the 1200 and other earlier printers. As you know,
Richard,
Thanks for the updating of my information on the subject and for filling in
some of the holes while correcting the errors. From what you have said I
take it that the movie film is no longer used by these processors; does this
mean that they are now using standard still films which any
Sorry, drifting off topic.
Never a problem with me - especially if the information is informative or
interesting.
I hate to sound stupid; but I want to check and see if you mean what I think
you mean when you speak of CN in relation to film. Are you speaking about a
chromogenic negative? All
: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
You may want to check out this link for the latest and greatest from Mother
Kodak as far as 35mm motion picture stock goes... this particular link is to
a
250 ASA DAYLIGHT neg stock...
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/negative/5246.shtml
Mike M.
Laurie
I was talking to a high end ink jet salesman who sold
both HP and Epson (and other) wide format
machines
The real question is was he
talking about the inks used in the commercial wide format inkjet printers used
by sign shops and reprographic houses; or was he talking about the inks that
Aren't they the ones who bought 35mm movie film tails, respooled the 35mm
movie film ends into canisters of 24 and 36 exposures, and then resold the
35mm canisters to the public via the mail. The net result was that you had
to use them for processing because no other knowledgeable lab would
In all probability it could just as well be Konica film - also from Germany.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 5:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
"Mark
Dave,
That is very useful information. I have seen packages of EPGPP in the
stores with "new" and "improved" stickers on them; but since the original
EPGPP often had similar stickers on them, I was not sure if I could trust
them to be the reformulated paper or the old paper which while
]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions
On 21/3/01 9:35 pm, "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, it all depends on a number of factors. The only universal
statment that one can make as an absolute is that you do not have the
right
to "sell images
Maybe he can read but he certainly can't spell. I find it interesting that
until two days ago I never heard of him; and in the last two days we have
heard all kinds of vile, rude, abusive comments about people who wrote about
OT subjects from him but not a substantive word until this latest post
And quite frankly neither do I; but I refuse to indulge him or in his temper
tantrums so I will just ignore his posts and continue to do whatever it was
that I was going to do or say as if he did not exist. I am sure that we all
ignore him until Tony throws him off the list, he will disappear of
What I am saying is not to be construed as disagreeing with or objecting to
anything you have said. It is merely meant as a clarification of one small
point respecting your comment: "Perhaps OT messages could be revised in the
subject title -- instead of reading "Re: filmscanner ."." I
Tony,
can't speak for the UK or for Europe for that matter; but in the US, some
artwork is considered to be in the public domain because they are historic
artifacts which were created prior to any copyright laws or under older
copyright laws which had time limitations on ownership of the
Is there any exact specification for copyright presentation?
Yes, for legal purposes, I think there is both a proper form for the
copyright notice, if it is used, for the contents of the notice, if it is
used, and for the date that should be used. The date, I believe, is the
date of registration
In the United States, at least, the copyright corresponds to the date of
publication-
But one needs to remember that the term "publication" as used in the legal
system is construed very broadly to include public display. Thus, if a
photographer sends a brand new photograph to a stock agency to
In France (and other parts of Europe), the copyright is in perpetuity.
If they are like the current U.S. copyright law, the copyright is not in
perpetuity; but it is for the lifetime of the creator plus 25 years (or it
may be 100 years - I forget) after which it is not renewable. The older
Roger,
Since
the topic has come up on each and every list I belong to at one time or another
in a recurring manner, I have decided to respond to your post in private because
I think that there are a few things you should be aware of.
First,
your presentation of information tends to
Not to "dis" Niko or Rob (it was a perfectly valid and timely response, and
exactly what this forum is most useful for), but do others think it would
be
helpful to change the Subject line when responding to a thread that's
gotten
a bit off-track?
You are right; but for better or worse, it is one
Of course, it all depends on a number of factors. The only universal
statment that one can make as an absolute is that you do not have the right
to "sell images of ANYTHING you photograph." If the sculptures are on
private property or are private property, you need the permission of the
owner
Maybe I can finally get some work done today.
Now you really did not want to do that did you? :-)
Shipping and reshipping these large monitors can be a real pain in the but
as well as expensive. I have had my share of monitors going bad and needing
to be shipped back under warranty to know
My friend has dual monitors with different resolutions going under Windows
2000 on the Matrox 450.
Frank have you actually checked out your friends system to see if your
friend actually is running the two monitors under different resolutions as
opposed to thinking he is. I think you ought to
I concur with you that fixed fonts, menus, dialog boxes, and tool boxes are
a design decision by Adobe. My understanding from posts over the years in a
number of forums and mailing lists was that the decision was made that it
was too much of a pain in the programming ass to program for dynamic
Low prices; but probably a very heavy VAT tax in country and a mighty
shipping charge out of country.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Kersenbrock
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
, March 10, 2001 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Given the way dual PC systems with OSs that support dual monitors work, it
not only is the common way - or even the preferred way; it appears to be the
only way. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Shomler
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001
Not in my experience; it only increases menu and tool sizes in the OS
interface and maybe Microsoft applications. A number of independent
applications have fixed menu and tool sizes built into their programs which
adjust with the changes in resolution but not with changes in the OS
settings for
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is the sweet spot in the pricing structu
Yes it can. I have two dual monitor systems. One has two separate ATI
cards and the other has a single dual head Matrox 400 Millennium card. Both
allow under Win 98 for the monitors to be independent of each other and to
be set at different resolutions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
My understanding is that Win2K is a replacement upgrade for Win NT. It
would be most useful to those who utilize large networks. It supposedly is
more stable than Win 98, 98SE, and ME; but it does not cupport the range of
drivers that are supported under the other versions - at least not yet.
As for the difference in images between the two monitors, the first thing
to
do is to calibrate both monitors.
I agree 100%
If I am not mistaken, Adobe has within it a calibration mechanism from
there on.
Here I have to disagree at least in so far as Win 98 is concerned. On
systems using Win
Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is the sweet spot in the pricing structure right now
Not in my neck of the woods. Actually, at least where I live, 19" monitors
are the current popular models and tend to be the sweet spot in terms of
pricing. I would venture to say that this
Unless, of course, he - like many other big name photographers - is getting
endorsement money or free ownership, leasing, or use of equipment from
Epson. In so far as Epson did not openly or widely acknowledge the problem,
it is also possible that he has not suffered from the problem and is (a)
Frank,
I have a Hitachi CM815 Plus which is a 21" monitor that sells from PC
Connection for $1099US. I lucked out last Xmas when I bought it from
Onvia.com for $970 US with them picking up the shipping and handling. I am
very pleased with it; it has a 3 year warranty. Prior to it, I had the
Frank,
Try The Chicago Art Museum or Chicago Museum of Art. :-)
The artwork you speak of is truly amazing as are most of Seurat's other
works. This same painting, I believe, was also utilized as the backdrop and
the basis for a play on Seurat.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is "CPU" a word or is it an abbreviation? Only kidding and not meant for
further protracted discussion.
I am not going to take sides on the "halftone" vs. "dithering" controversy;
but I will say that the back and forth over the question was informative
whatever position one takes in that it
Marc Pawliger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] posted a message on the Photoshop
Discussion List which read as follows:
A number of Mac sites have pre-announced the Photoshop 6.0.1 update. The
link they posted is not the official one, and may no longer work when the
real one goes live
Tony,
I think this is a very astute analysis with which I agree completely,
unfortunately. Mass market mentality not only seems to prevail; it appears
to be steadily advancing in all areas of life. Even life itself appears to
be becoming cheaper with every passing day despite all the alledged
Could
it possibly be because it is easier and cheaper for them to output to in
terms of storage and transportability as well as because everyone seems to
assume that everyone wants their scans for use on the Web and do not really know
about or concern themselves with such matters as
I concur with you Hersch but would add that the danger is not from the
brightness of the light but from the ultraviolet light rays that the sun
emits and which are not screened out all that much by one-way mirrors and
pentaprisms.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
at the Sun
on 2/3/01 11:50 PM, Laurie Solomon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I concur with you Hersch but would add that the danger is not from the
brightness of the light but from the ultraviolet light rays that the sun
emits and which are not screened out all that much by one-way mirrors
features
come very close to those, if not in some instances surpass those, of
inkjets.
Eh!
Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: real value?
Ian,
Partia
Paul,
"Dynamic range," typically refers to tonal range or the contrast range that
the scanner can capture. 3.6 is considered very good for a CDD ( or is it
CCD, I get confused) based scanner; drum scanners can get up into the 4.0 to
4.4 range. I believe 5.0 is the upper limit of the scale; but
orifice. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
(3
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Ian,
Partial possible answers to your question are:
I wonder why there are so few people film scanning then printing with dye
sublimation printers?
(1) Dye sublimation printers may be too costly as compared to inkjet
. We have a long way to go to get to that point. In the
meantime, we
will have to settle for trying to be a society with less paper.
Gordon
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Laurie Solomon wrote:
I would suggest (a) that your office is a rarity, (b) your office
technically is not a "p
Ok, I accept your argument. I really did not miss your point; I was just
working on a different set of arguments to which that point was not very
relevant. Yes, it is true that, if we quick freeze a state of affairs in
time, it will go through the changing time continuum unchanged and will
Art,
You have hit the nail on the head and even with Michael Wilkinson's hammer.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic "signature"
will be as "good" and as unique as your fingerprint.
What you say may be true enough; but even that only guarentees the
authenticity of the signature and not the content of the document that the
signiture has been affixed
An original 54MB PSD file was compressed to the following:
29.5MB with TIF (LWZ compression)
21.8MB with GF ("Lossless compresion)
5.8MB with GF ("Virtually Lossless compression)
On the file I used to generate, I did not notice any significant differences
between any of the modes of compression
e document
not
sit beside the document.
-Original Message-----
From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
Sorry to hear that you broke your delete finger; hope it gets better soon.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
are 35mm prints.
Art
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Gee, there are a number of 10-18 screen multiplexes where I live; do they
count as movie theaters? I have actually gone to see movies in them also;
but there are many people in my university town who got to see movies in
these multiplexes every week
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
Laurie Solomon wrote:
I never intended to write anything of the sort. The computer skipped some
clogged
or dried up though, even when we've been away for two months. Res is awful,
longevity worse, color a nightmare.
Hart Corbett
--
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: real value?
Date: Tue, Jan 30, 2001, 7:54 PM
(1) Wil
For Trannies and Negs from Digital Files
,- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Operating systems could change
: dramatically so as to render drivers not only inefficient but totally
: obsolete, interface electronic connections may disappear to be
replaced with
Fact is anyone who sends me an mega important doc will always have a copy
themselves if we ever need it.
How can you count on this if we were actually in a "paperless society" or if
the other person was or was in a "paperless office" like you. Why would you
expect them to have a copy themselves
Gee, there are a number of 10-18 screen multiplexes where I live; do they
count as movie theaters? I have actually gone to see movies in them also;
but there are many people in my university town who got to see movies in
these multiplexes every week and throughout the week. They always seem
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.Rumary
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Laurie Solomon
wrote:
you are still more or less *cunt* and can afford
Eh!!!
Brian Rumary, England
http://freespace.
I feel strongly that a 10 year prediction is realistic in relation to
buying kit for personal use.
Of course one cannot argue with feelings so I will only say that while I
feel the ten year prediction is slightly on the optimistic side even for
personal use kits, as you put it in so British a
I would suggest (a) that your office is a rarity, (b) your office
technically is not a "paperless office" in that you still receive invoices,
receipts, etc. from others that you need to scan in, and (c) most other
places which are relying heavily on electronic operations still tend to keep
paper
(1) Will the 1200, using non-OEM inks, clog up if it's used for periods
separated by months?
(2) Will the 1200 clog up, using Epson inks, if only used periodically as
above?
In an attempt to respond to the above question, I think that most inkjets,
including the 1200, if left for any extended
From what you have written, it is unclear if you are using the same or
different monitors to view the images. If you are using different monitors,
then might this just be differences in monitors and /or a lack of monitor
calibration between the two. By setting your gamma at 2.2, you were
I looked at both images; and they look the same. Since I have no standard
against which to judge if they are lighter or darker than they should be, I
cannot comment on that aspect.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fotografia - tomasz
Your comments bring a smile to my face. Although they are economically
reasonable and express pragmatic prudence, I fear they are no longer
applicable, economically rational, or pragmatically sound in today's high
technology world.
The pace of advances far outstrips the longevity and operability
And, of course, we will have a paperless society, advanced artificial
intelligence, and Dot Coms will rule the world replacing the traditional
principles of economics and finance with new principles of finance and
economics where producing a profitable product is unnecessary as long as you
Frank,
Your reply itself is an interesting one. It is good; but it does raise some
new questions from a policy standpoint as well as from a manufacturing
standpoint. Taking the easy question first - e.g., the manufacturing
question.
Given that research, design, development, and manufacturing
The one thing I'm especially hesitant about is the matter of profiling all
elements of my system. Reading all the traffic here and on the Epson
Digest, that sounds like an unending headache,
Hersch,
All technological devices require more or less constant tuning and retuning
to be and remain
Actually Rob is right concerning Epson's official position. Furthermore,
just removing the CIS, if your printer allows for the use of a CIS since
many do not - especially the newer chipped models, and reinstalling the
Epson cartridges by itself will not necessarily work. You would have to
flush
Technically and literally, this may not be construed to be "voiding the
warrantee; but for all practical purposes, it certainly sounds like it with
respect to the specific problem to me (e.g., "if these products cause a
failure, the repair of that failure will not be covered under warranty.")
All dye based inks fade given the right conditions - time and lighting among
others. Black tends to go toward the brown ( sometimes the bluish side and
sometimes the greenish side). Even some users of pigment inks have
complained about the Blacks not being true blacks to begin with a tendency
"Lightfastness' maybe; but what about "gasfastness" or "ozonefastness?"
Afterall, it was not the lack of lightfastness that caused the orange fade
in the 1270 case and usually within a period of time much much shorter than
the 10 year lightfastness claim for the Premium Glossy paper. I really
I concur; I was only offering a word of caution and not trying to endorse
any given manufacturer or model.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Kehl
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
You need this info..
The Epson x7x Printers Group at eGroups.com currently has over 900
members..
Unlike other EPSON Inkjet mailing lists, it is an unmoderated mailing
list that formerly focused on the EPSON x7x Printers. However, now that
it has become a valuable resource on EPSON inkjet
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ray Amos
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
Laurie Solomon wrote
Actually, a power company and working statewide power grid is what is
needed. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 7:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Power Crisis and UPS
On
California?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Power Crisis and UPS
| Actually, a power company and working statewide power grid is what is
| needed. :-)
|
| ---
Roman,
I am reading this and laughing; but not at you. I am laughing because for
the life of me I cannot figure out what we are really arguing about in that
we are in agreement on most of the points. I agree that currently digital
photography at its present stage of development leaves much to
I agree with Roman. I think you are being a little over optimistic. While
technology is moving fast and the day will come, I do not think that time
will be in the immediate future.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.Rumary
Sent:
Yes they do. Like many things Kodak has attempted, their effort to finish
off Kodachrome was not a success. So they can use all the help they can get
from whom ever will give it. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent:
i do not want to spend too much money and need recogmendations.
How much are you willing to spend and what level of quality will you settle
for? Good 20" monitors that have high quality outputs are not cheap
compared to the consumer quality 19" than have been showing up. I just
bought a
Ok, Thanks for the corrective clarification. Given this, I would concur
that my earlier speculation on how it might be possible to cross-process E-6
to obtain a negative without the color mask would not work. There are
obvious differences between E-6 and C-41 processing apart from merely the
Roman,
I do not see this as an appropriate answer; actually I think it begs the
question, except if one assumes that priority is to be given to the
traditional methods of printing as you seem to want to do. I do not
criticize you for assigning priority as you have (it is legitimate).
However,
Roman,
I think that what exists is in fact a compromise; and one which will satisfy
neither side of the issue. I do not think that traditional photographers
who optically print negatives or digital photographers who want to scan
their negatives see the compromise as being beautiful or an
While you may very well be right about the only difference being in the
addition of new film emulsion hardeners to prevent scratching, Kodak claims
to have done more than this to the film so as to make it more appropriate
for scanning.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Gordon
Laurie Solomon wrote:
There is no reason why said negative films could not be designed to be
optimized for digital uses only ... Now such a thing may very well be
impractical but it is not
impossible or illogical.
Ed, with the deepest of respect, since you cite a quote from me, I feel some
compulsion to respond. I do not believe that I stated or implied that
removal of the orange mask was difficult to do or would make scanning
easier.
Others with whom I was corresponding seemed to feel that the orange
I stand corrected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Smith
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: orange mask E6
At 7:27 PM -0600 1/15/01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
If my understandings
Bear in mind that it is not important, how does the mask look to your eye,
but how the paper emulsion sees it. and for the paper the differences may
be negligible.
So would one be wrong to interpret what you are saying here in a fashion as
to infer that it might be generally said that these
Are the 'jaggies' perhaps related to the bit depth???
I don't think so; I think they are related more to resolution than bit
depth. The more ppi or dpi ( depending on what technocratic dictionary that
you use) the fewer jaggies up to a point.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to try
that!!
Thanx again!
Guy Clark
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Umax scanners
For some reason, the TWAIN drivers for the two machines don't coexist well
.
Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am surprised you did not know that [RC prints] were not as archival
as fiber based prints and that you are surprised by this. However, I
bet you knew it all along and are just pulling out legs. :-)
Yeah, I knew that only the archival reliability of FB
ng, sudden fading, uneven fading, etc, etc.
Art
Laurie Solomon wrote:
"crud"
Isn't that a technical term?
Like inkjet prints, BW RC photographic prints are getting better in terms
of longevity; but they are not anywhere near fiber based prints. They
never
have been hyped as being
I understand and take your point. I only question - in a speculative way -
your assumptions regarding the time frames of needing to recopy every other
technical generation which you guess to be once a decade. It is equally
plausible to assume that as the pace of technological development speeds
401 - 500 of 529 matches
Mail list logo
