Re: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?

2001-01-12 Thread DonConnors
In a message dated 1/11/01 6:43:52 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As far as 6 ink printers for the Cone system are concerned, I understand the extra inks have no benefit in output quality. On the downside, the 6 ink set is available only in cartridges, not in bulk

Re: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?

2001-01-11 Thread DonConnors
In a message dated 1/10/01 4:40:35 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?Where does one get info on the Cone quadtone inks? Thanks Beware Cone quadtone setup for Epson 3000 - the inks are great, but the driver overdrives

Re: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?

2001-01-11 Thread Peter Marquis-Kyle
: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?Where does one get info on the Cone quadtone inks? Thanks Beware Cone quadtone setup for Epson 3000 - the inks are great, but the driver overdrives the printer, which can never keep up and produces banding no matter what... if you go with Cone inks

Re: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?

2001-01-10 Thread Berry Ives
Title: Re: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough? on 1/10/01 2:32 PM, Bud at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where does one get info on the Cone quadtone inks? Thanks http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/piezographyBW.html

filmscanners: but which printer is good enough?

2001-01-08 Thread Berry Ives
Title: filmscanners: but which printer is good enough? Could be OT, but among filmscanners, maybe not: In considering Epson 1160 vs 1200 vs 2000p, given the following: 1. 1160 has 4 colors and 4 picoliter droplets and can use bulk Generations pigments with CIS 1200 has 6 colors and 6