Am I the only one who has problems with the crop outline in Vuescan? I have
been wondering why it is so incredibly difficult to position correctly. I
*think* it's mostly due to one aspect of behaviour. Let's say I'm cropping
an image in Paintshop Pro. I click and drag to create a rough
Has anyone else experienced this? I'd have to say that the behaviour of the
crop box outline is the most frustrating feature of Vuescan.
Yes and it bugs me, too. I've sort of learned how to compensate for it but
it and the lack of a histogram remain my only two significant complaints
about the
Rob:
have you tired increase the buffer %? Maybe double it do Vuescan ignores #% of the
image from the border to make sure it doesn't pick up the black film edge.
Alan
Vuescan appears to move the whole crop box sometimes when dragging one
side.
This makes getting the outline right
If you use the HP for plain paper text as well as photos I'd stick with the
HP as IMHO it does this much better.
In my experience I have found Epson photographic type output on specialist
papers is slightly better, but I have not seen the same image printed on
both printers by a competent
I just released VueScan 7.0.21 for Windows, Linux and
Mac OS 8.x, OS 9.x and OS X. I built two versions for
the Macintosh - one in CFM format (8.x/9.x) and one in
Mach-O format (OS X). The Mach-O version works with
many USB scanners on OS X. If you have a USB scanner
that's supported by
In a message dated 5/19/2001 7:05:01 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I the only one who has problems with the crop outline in Vuescan? I have
been wondering why it is so incredibly difficult to position correctly.
Try zooming into the image before dragging the crop outline. In
Dan wrote:
I am looking to buy another printer. I currently have an HP970cxi which
has PhotoREt III technology (HP's latest three color + black) and I
think it prints great. I have not seen a side by side comparison of the
HP's vs the Epson's.
This is my first opportunity to sound off on this
remove
At 05:34 AM 5/19/01, Arthur Entlich wrote:
...
My secrets for street photography without getting killed
...
Thanks for the encouragement.
- Clive Moss
http://clive.moss.net
To fight Cancer go to http://www.ud.com download the software, and join my
team by clicking on
Hi Ed!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try zooming into the image before dragging the crop outline.
This helps a bit, but the crop box still has a tendency to jump
around when releasing the mouse button after dragging.
I don't want to *have* to use the zoom, as each step slows things
down.
The
Rob wrote:
Am I the only one who has problems with the crop outline in Vuescan?
clip
The autocrop doesn't always eliminate strips of black at the edges of a
frame, and including them can greatly affect the exposure.
Has anyone else experienced this? I'd have to say that the behaviour of
the
Steve wrote:
Ok it will be approx US $7000 but hopefully the consumer stuff will
eventually follow on.
That's a pretty big hit, AFAIC. You can buy several Leicas for that amount.
Even a professional will look very closely at that sort of high-ticket
item--it has to start paying off very
on 5/19/01 8:30 AM, Steve Greenbank at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See this :
http://www.robgalbraith.com/diginews/2001-05/2001_05_17_dcs_760.html
and in particular this : (be warned it's 1.4M)
http://www.robgalbraith.com/public_files/dcs760_bw_portrait.jpg
well, it's very very sharp
Lynn: You make some good points relative to the camera. There are other
factors too that an amateur must consider. One biggy is the storage capacity of
digital cameras. That is getting better but it still has not reached the point
where the chips will hold a lot of tiff images. The image
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
|
|
| Alan Tyson wrote:
|
| Just to add an alternative, broader view to the
| discussion
|
| I
Lynn writes ...
Rob wrote:
Am I the only one who has problems with the crop outline in
Vuescan?
clip
...
I'm probably being a bit of a Philistine here, but I've never let
Vuescan
be the Last Call for my images--
I suppose I am with Lynn ... afterall, whether you use Vuescan to
On Fri, 18 May 2001 10:22:38 -0400 (EDT) Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I'm starting to think, Hey, this
filmscanning stuff might just catch on!
Yes. I recently did some shots, informal contre-jour portraits of a guy
during an interview. He was indoors, back to the window, sunny day
I suppose I am with Lynn ... afterall, whether you use Vuescan to
crop, or not, it still scans the entire frame, simply delivering
what's within the area to the cropped file.
The problem is the little slivers of black border that are left cause it to
calculate the scan exposure incorrectly. To
If you (John Brownlow below) could talk in terms of digital imaging
terms, maybe I could understand precisely what you are talking about.
The word tone means almost anything, depending on the background of
the individual.
What I would like www.robgalbraith.com to post is the gamut breadth
Jeffrey writes ...
I suppose I am with Lynn ... afterall, whether you use Vuescan to
crop, or not, it still scans the entire frame, simply delivering
what's within the area to the cropped file.
The problem is the little slivers of black border that are left
cause it to
calculate the scan
From: shAf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 11:43:30 -0700
Jeffrey writes ...
I suppose I am with Lynn ... afterall, whether you use Vuescan to
crop, or not, it still scans
on 5/19/01 2:46 PM, Richard N. Moyer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you (John Brownlow below) could talk in terms of digital imaging
terms, maybe I could understand precisely what you are talking about.
The word tone means almost anything, depending on the background of
the individual.
Tony wrote:
This is exactly why I got into scanning, to expand the range of
possibilities. Filmscanners and software are now powerful enough tools to
easily surpass what conventional darkrooms can achieve in most respects.
clip
And of course, hardest of the lot, taking
a decent photo in the
Looks to me like it can't handle continuous-tone any better than a toy
camera you'd get with Cracker-Jacks! With stellar decisions like this, I'm
going to hold on to all my Kodak stuff--looks like they'll be *rarities* in
a few years, given this apparent death-wish from Rochester.
--LRA
on 5/19/01 6:58 PM, Dave Buyens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My secrets for street photography without getting killed include some
fast slight of hand on occasion (looking like you are photographing
somewhere or something else). But more often its just a really big smile
that disarms people
Lynn Allen:
I *always* do the touchup in another program, and I'm leaning toward doing *all* of
the
color-correction from Raw scans there, too.
Is that with slides or negs Lynn? I have been trying some processing of raw neg scans
in PS lately, but reproducing the tonal range/gamma that
For art you don't need a release as far as I am aware.
You do in the U.S. if the person is recognizable and you do not want to get
sued for invasion of privacy. If the subject is recognizable and your
artwork defames their reputation and /or character or implies something
untrue or that they
on 5/19/01 10:57 PM, Laurie Solomon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[re needing or not needing releases for 'art']
You do in the U.S. if the person is recognizable and you do not want to get
sued for invasion of privacy.
There is no right to privacy in a public place by definition. We are
28 matches
Mail list logo
