[filmscanners] Re: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread James L. Sims
I, for one, would hate to see this list go by the wayside. It has helped me make choices in a evolution of scanners and, as far as I know, scanners are still improving. Many of the members on this list, and they're too numerous to name, have been of invaluable assistance to me. I agree with

[filmscanners] RE: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread Kris
To all: I will add my support to revive this list. Unlike many of you, I recently joined in hopes of getting some good ideas to support the purchase of a filmscanner in my business. I have been disappointed in the very few messages that have come across, so much so I haven't even introduced

[filmscanners] RE: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread Laurie Solomon
Maybe, the name of the group should be changed to Image Capturing and Digitalization Techniques. :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I, for one, would hate to see this list go by the wayside. It has helped me make choices in a evolution of scanners and, as far as I know, scanners are still

[filmscanners] Re: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread Brad Davis
Laurie, Were it up to me, and it isn't, so this is just a preference, I would have it cover digital photography from acquisition to printing. We don't have to duplicate Phil Askey, but I would love to know what actual experience is with different digital cameras - is the canon Mark II really that

[filmscanners] Re: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread Julian Vrieslander
On 9/8/04 4:32 PM, Brad Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Were it up to me, and it isn't, so this is just a preference, I would have it cover digital photography from acquisition to printing. I have not been a conspicuous presence on this list, mostly lurking for a couple of years. I have

[filmscanners] RE: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread Laurie Solomon
Laurie, you are one of the gurus here, and I hope that the rest of them - there must be nearly a dozen real experts in various areas, including actual practice - are still around. Flattery will get you everywhere you smooth talker you; but on these sorts of lists flattery will only get you in

[filmscanners] Re: Revive this list?!

2004-09-08 Thread Brad Davis
Jules, Actually, that makes sense to me too - would you suggest what we might address best here? Scanners seem about done as a topic - they'll be around for a while, but they are more like appliances than specialized equipment and a lot of the issues have been addressed. I would like to keep