And this is the beautiful thing about the paperless office--the delete key.
;)
Spencer Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re:
Thanks, Maris, I appreciate your reply.
Hersch
At 11:10 AM 02/01/2001 -0600, you wrote:
The law is called the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce
Act. It is described at
http://olpa.od.nih.gov/Legislation/1electronic.htm and the text is at
It is - see my post of 12 hours ago.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Sumtingwong" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:49 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
| I would have to do more research on this. A well informed friend
Paul Patton writes ...
I've just been reading some Nikon literature about their new
scanners, and
I have some questions about the terminology. The ad states that the
coolscan IV ED yeilds 48 bit images (48 bits per pixel?). Later, it
states that the scanner has a color bit depth of 24 or
Michael,
I've got to be careful here as this is a scanners BBS not a printer BBS but
I wonder why there are so few people film scanning then printing with dye
sublimation printers?
Surely these would fully complement say a 4000 dpi scanner?
My only questions are:
(1) BW - I see no mention of
I just released VueScan 6.6.1 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.6.1
* Added "Color|Gamma" option to allow changing the
gamma of the image (including gamma 1.0).
* Modified infrared cleaning so setting
Hi;
I went to the site mentioned below and under the Linux version it does not mention which architecture that this is compiled for. I am assuming it is for intel; but I need one for the power pc. I have a Mac G4 running the Debian Linux release. Is it possible to get VueScan for the power pc
So given the two statements together, if one has a non infared capable
scanner (in my case SS 4000), does the "clean" setting reduce film grain
on my scanner as per second statement seems to imply, or need I put it
on "Scrub" as first statement implies in order to begin to see reduction
in film
In a message dated 2/2/2001 9:22:08 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So given the two statements together, if one has a non infared capable
scanner (in my case SS 4000), does the "clean" setting reduce film grain
on my scanner
Yes - with VueScan 6.6.1.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: (1) BW - I see no mention of this is any Dye sub printer literature
: (2) Where do I find an A3 Dye sub printer under 2000 UK Pounds?
.
Try looking for a used one !!!
Repro-Link is a trade mag with
I thought some of you might know that just yesterday I received a call
from Kodak asking me if I had any more problems with the scanner other than
I already discussed with them. (I've never had a company do that for me before)
Apparently there is a focusing problem when scanning negatives.
Paul,
"Dynamic range," typically refers to tonal range or the contrast range that
the scanner can capture. 3.6 is considered very good for a CDD ( or is it
CCD, I get confused) based scanner; drum scanners can get up into the 4.0 to
4.4 range. I believe 5.0 is the upper limit of the scale; but
And please don't forget us Corel PhotoPaint users and the PSP users like my
sister.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.6 Available
| In a message dated 2/1/2001 0:17:51
I got a Minolta Scan Dual II without any infrared channel. What would be the best
Vuescan setting / version (6.6.0 or 6.6.1) to remove _only_ grain, not dust spots?
Would an option in Vuescan which _only_ reduced grain be possible?
Nimous
* Modified infrared cleaning so setting
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Sumtingwong wrote:
I would have to do more research on this. A well informed friend told me
about it at work. I do believe that it is now part of the U.S. Code,
though.
I hate for my first post to this list to be off-topic, but it is indeed
federal law. The law is
I use my D30 on Super-Fine JPEG mostly, and the 1G Microdrive can hold
about 799 of those.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B.Rumary) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Berry Ives wrote:
Digital SLRs that have maybe half the required resolution now cost
about
$3K.
If
Until CMOS sensors became high-quality, the image sensor market was held
back by the specialist nature of the CCD manufacturing process. You can't
produce a CCD in a CMOS fab line and vice versa, and CCD fabs lag well
behind the CMOS equivalents.
Now, the sky's the limit. Image sensors like
- Original Message -
From: Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
Michael,
I've got to be careful here as this is a scanners BBS not a printer BBS
but
I wonder why there are so few people
Well, ok then!
That's the kind of major breakthrough that I was talking about! If this
allows the relatively easy manufacture of imaging arrays of high resolution,
then some of my comments become moot.
I did see a reference to the Kodak digital imaging website where an array on
the order of
At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
(3) Inkjets have reached the level where there quality and other features
come very close to those, if not in some instances surpass those, of
inkjets.
??
Am I reading this wrong, it doesn't make sense to me.
Ed,
Can you tell us which flimscanners have an "accessible" IR channel? Are
they only scanners which have digital ICE, like the LS 30/2000 and
Minolta Elite and Acer 2740, or are other "hiding" this feature?
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/1/2001 0:17:51 AM EST, [EMAIL
Ian: I had looked at a some ALPS Electric dye sub printers before getting my
Epson. Based on the prices I saw, I would say the 2000 UK Pounds would be at
the very top of the line. Their web site ( Search for "ALPS Electric") shows
OEM and retail printers.. Their global section shows an office
In a message dated 2/2/2001 6:15:18 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you tell us which flimscanners have an "accessible" IR channel? Are
they only scanners which have digital ICE, like the LS 30/2000 and
Minolta Elite and Acer 2740
Yes, this is the list. Digital ICE is just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
(3) Inkjets have reached the level where there quality and other
features
come very close to those, if not in some instances surpass those, of
inkjets.
?? Am I reading this wrong, it doesn't make sense to me.
I
Paul,
An addendum to Laurie's post:
All color scanners have three channels: Red, Green and Blue (RGB). Some
scanners have an additional infrared channel used for special scratch/dust
removal features. So, a scanner that gives 8 bits per channel would give a
total of 24 bits per pixel if
I realize this is off topic to the general list discussion, but I
believe it will be of interest to many considering output from their
film scanners. To all others please hit "delete" now.
IS Dye sub your "final answer" copyright A. Entlich
Dye sub printers are once again beginning to be
Stuart,
Ezio is right. I got one of those little slide adapters with my HP 6300.
It's a real joke. I can't believe HP ever made it. I had the same
experience as Ezio, except I didn't have to get on my knees and make peanut
butter, because I gave up after two or three tries. (Ezio, I guess
I buy a lot of items secondhand, including a lot of technology which I
have saved tons of money doing. I would be very cautious about
considering buying a dye sub printer used, unless it came with a very
good service contract. They are finicky and very expensive to repair,
and they are heavy
Do you have any recommended settings
for scanning Kodak HIE (High Speed Infrared) with VueScan?
Stan
EdHamrick wrote:
I just released VueScan 6.6.1 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
(3) Inkjets have reached the level where there quality and other features
come very close to those, if not in some instances surpass those, of
inkjets.
??
Am I reading this wrong, it doesn't make sense to me.
You are right on both accounts. As written it makes no sense at all; but a
relatively non acrobatic leap to the assumption you suggest would be in
order.
I sure wish all you editors were around before I actually transmitted the
posts rather than after I put my foot in my mouth or in another
Hallo, all,
Anybody who's using or knows a bit about the abovementioned scanner
or the belowmentioned software, please pop me an e-mail offlist.
I have a client who was using some very old ('94) 3rd-party software
(SpectrePrintPro), and a Mac OS upgrade trashed it. Returning to the
on 2/2/01 9:14 AM, OK Photo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently there is a focusing problem when scanning negatives.
Because of the curvature of the negative the scans are sharper at the sides
then they are in the center.
I was aware of this but it wasn't a big concern for me. Anyway
Hi,
I've learned a new word today: Gamma.
It's something with the way monitors show images, but what exactly is it??
I notice that my scanner software has a gamma adjustment and playing with
it I noticed that it changes the way the image appear on the screen.
But what exactly is this
Hello List,
Just out of old fashioned curiosity: What does the K in CMYK stand for?
Tom
You are right on both accounts. As written it makes no sense at all; but a
relatively non acrobatic leap to the assumption you suggest would be in
order.
At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
(3) Inkjets have reached the level where there quality and other
features
come very
Start reading here: CGSD - Gamma Correction Home Page:
http://www.cgsd.com/papers/gamma.html and read on.
All the facts you want and then some.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Christiansen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject:
Black
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Christiansen
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 7:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: The K in
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is Giorgianni and Madden's definition from "Digital Color Management":
"Exponent of a power-law equation relating CRT luminance to control-signal
voltage". Also, "The slope of the straight-line portion of a CRT
characteristic curve relating log
I have the impression that Alps is going out of the Dye Sub printer business.
At 06:21 PM 02/02/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Ian: I had looked at a some ALPS Electric dye sub printers before getting my
Epson. Based on the prices I saw, I would say the 2000 UK Pounds would be at
the very top of the
Maybe this is a selfish suggestion as I think it may only be useful with
Nikon scanners - how about a checkbox to automatically eject the film after
scanning the last frame on a strip? When batch scanning this would be nice,
as it means the film ejects automatically and doesn't spend too much
It stands for black. The letter "B" was already taken for something else, I
don't recall what, in the printing industry.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Christiansen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 9:06 PM
Subject: filmscanners: The K in
Arthur Entlich wrote:
you also use a full series of panels. So, place just one dot the size
of a period anywhere in the image, and the printer will use up a full
set of ink panels to do that. Consumable costs are constant. You do
This isn't true of my Alps MD-1300. It would only use a
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Ian,
Partial possible answers to your question are:
I wonder why there are so few people film scanning then printing with dye
sublimation printers?
(1) Dye sublimation printers may be too costly as compared to inkjet
printers both to purchase and to operate
I too would be interested in a PPC linux version, specifically LinuxPPC. I'll even
offer machine cycles for compiliations if it would facilitate it.
Thanks!
Andrew Robinson
William Swats wrote:
Hi;
I went to the site mentioned below and under the Linux version it does not mention
which
Mike, I have no reason to question or refute anything you have said. I must
admit that I do not know all that much about Dye-Sub printers except what I
have read, heard and seen by way of sample prints. Most of the information
and samples came not from Alps devices but from Kodak devices
Hi,
Here is Giorgianni and Madden's definition from "Digital Color Management":
"Exponent of a power-law equation relating CRT luminance to control-signal
voltage".
OK. I thought the relationship between luminance and control voltage was
linear. But I guess that if it was linear the viewer
47 matches
Mail list logo
