In a message dated 3/12/2001 7:40:53 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that you have the LS-40 working with Vuescan... What is your opinion
of scanner?
It's an excellent scanner. The images are some of the best I've seen
from any scanner and the scanner seems basically like an LS-30
Rob said:
It's capable of using custom ICM profiles, so it should be fine. Just
depends on what resolution and refresh you want to run at, but
I think it will do most you could want.
Thanks Rob. A friend here also suggested looking at a Riva TNT2-M64 32MB, but I
believe they are "last year's"
I have also used this technique with success. It is the workflow
that evolved for me while doing production drum scans to be handed off
either for retouching and photocomposition or for archiving. The idea in
that environment was to get the maximum amount of information in the scan
while
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Rob Geraghty wrote:
Art wrote:
Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus? Can WIN 2K run on a
Celeron system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
Does anyone know why a bunch of list messages have been resent? I've just
seen several duplicates. :-7
BTW I just used a
Now that I've got my new Win2K system up and running (still waiting for a
second Sony monitor from Dell), I'm finding that it's impossible to get the
monitors to look alike (by eye) between my Win98SE system and the Win2K
system. The grays on the Win2K are much colder and lighter in comparing
My SS4000 is constantly going through a scan cycle, even without a
holder in. I've tried putting holders through a number of times with the
machine off, as suggested in the support website. I also ordered the
free sensor cleaning brush that David Hemingway sent a message about the
other day, but
Anybody give me hint on why when I print form Photoshop to my Photosmart
printer, I get a cross hatch pattern? Not in all photos.
Did these images come from an unregistered copy of VueScan? It's possible
that when you downloaded a new copy of VueScan that you forgot to copy over
the
Same happened to me. You need to uncheck the watermark box.
"Shough, Dean" wrote:
Anybody give me hint on why when I print form Photoshop to my Photosmart
printer, I get a cross hatch pattern? Not in all photos.
Did these images come from an unregistered copy of VueScan? It's
Have you calibrated the black points of both monitors and set them to the
same temperature?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Berman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Trying to Calibrate Monitors to Match
| Now
Rick wrote:
Just started noticing this- but things that were posted a week ago seem to
be showing up on list again... server problems?
Rick
I've noticed the same thing, and just chastized my ISP. Oh, well, they
deserved it anyway. ;-)
(Also mentioned it to Tony, off-list, but he's been awfully
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Trying to Calibrate Monitors to Match
I was looking at the ColorCal system:
http://www.colorcal.com
You're darn tootin' this is relevant! Please post your responses to Larry's
question here so the rest of us can benefit. Thanks in advance.
Mike M.
Larry Berman wrote:
Now that I've got my new Win2K system up and running (still waiting for a
second Sony monitor from Dell), I'm finding that
Alan T wrote:
There are 7 CDs, each consisting almost entirely of Kodak's
software. The data, as approx 1500x1000pixel 500KB jpegs at,
I estimate, "95% quality" takes up 102MB altogether,
complete with a freeware image viewer, when I transcribe it
to a CD-R.
The way I bypassed this problem
Software City wrote:
Being in the repair biz, I can only say we see lots more HP inkjets, then
all the other brands combined (granted there are more HP's in circulation,
but the numbers still seem disproportionate). HP does great lasers, but I'd
never recommend an HP inkjet to a Customer.
Hey Mike--
Thanks for the Raw Scan Input. Thank you, too, Eli--it'll take me a bit to
absorb that much input, but should be worth it.
At your "suggestion(s)" I tried ouputing Raw scans from Kodacolor negs on my
Scanwit, this AM. I was surprised how easy it was, especially with Vuescan,
which
The DMAX of the LS-40 will be 3.6 instead of the 3.0 DMAX in the LS-30.
Is the main improvement of the LS-40 over the LS-30 the USB connection, 12
bits vs. 10 bits, and slightly higher DPI?
HI, Ed!
Any chance of changing this? It would be great if we could play with the
exposure in preview mode without actually doing the scan. I imagine that
this would speed up my attempting to optimize the exposure on some of my
hard to scan underexposed slides.
If not, why?
Thanx
Guy
Avi33 writes ...
The DMAX of the LS-40 will be 3.6 instead of
the 3.0 DMAX in the LS-30.
...
Unfortunately, it is up for debate what any Dmax is for the Nikon
scanners. That is, their Dmax specification seems to be simply what
the bit depth is capable of storing, and may have
Qoton wrote:
I have heard that HP inkjet heads actually last longer if you refill them
and continue
to print... I have two HP printers so far I have no complaint. I got a Canon
before. It
was simply not comparable in print quality.
Good question! I have a Lexmark Z51 (I don't print marketable
Hi, all--
I have to back up a little bit about my "glowing review" of Photoshop's Dust
Scratches filter (Sunday's post?). If you're doing animals particularly
wild-life photography, you *don't* want to use it. I just tried it on a cat
(original size on neg about 1/2 centimeter) and even at
Tony - the consensus of some other list managers is that it is the
Naked Wife virus, which has taken a variety of servers down to their
knees, and hobbled others. Bringing them back up has resulted in
doubling, or more. I really don't know, just what I hear. PC only.
If you haven't heard
When I started scanning my own film, I spent about a week fixing the images and
printing them out.
I've cut that down on my images to about 3 hours from the time I load the film
in the carrier and have a print I will hang on the wall.
Just curious what the average time is for others on the
Alan,
It depends on the image. Some images take just a couple of hours or so,
others I work on for days, never seeming to get them just right.
Cathy
http://www.catbrownphoto.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Womack
Sent: Tuesday,
shAF wrote:
Unfortunately, it is up for debate what any Dmax is for the Nikon
scanners.
This brings up a question I've wanted to ask: is there some place on the Net
(or otherwise) where one can look at and compare the dynamic-ranges of
current scanners (film or otherwise), and make sense of
shAF wrote:
Unfortunately, it is up for debate what any Dmax is for the Nikon
scanners.
This brings up a question I've wanted to ask: is there some place on the Net
(or otherwise) where one can look at and compare the dynamic-ranges of
current scanners (film or otherwise), and make sense of
Joel: Be sure you do not remove the "+" sign after the number. You can replace
any part of the information before the # 1 and the + and vueScan automatically
increases the number by 1. e.g. Crop0001, Crop0002 etc. The key is don't mess
with the +. You can even chang the number Crop21+ and
Guy wrote:
Any chance of changing this? It would be great if we could play with the
exposure in preview mode without actually doing the scan. I imagine that
this would speed up my attempting to optimize the exposure on some of my
hard to scan underexposed slides.
If you change the brightness,
Jules writes ...
I think many on the list would vote for a separate
checkbox control to enable grain removal
independently of the clean/scrub/scour setting.
but scrub = clean + grain removal and
scour = clean + heavier grain removal
AFAIK the clean algorithm does change between the
Just on the topic of incrementing the numbers, it would be really useful
to be able to have a *negative* increment. I never had a need for this
until last night when I plugged in the APS adapter for the LS30 (which worked
flawlessly BTW). When you load the film, the adapter winds the entire
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: analog gain
Guy wrote:
Any chance of changing this? It would be great if we could play with the
exposure in preview mode without
At 09:08 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
If you change the brightness, the best thing to do is rerun the preview
scan. It's not horribly slow. Otherwise you're not seeing the result of
the longer integration time. I imagine Ed could code Vuescan to estimate
the change produced by the brightness
At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
why would you want to seperate these? to allow the
option of grain removal WITHOUT clean?
Yes, or to allow varying intensities of clean without
grain removal. They should be two separate drop down
options, and with the interface changes in 7.0 there's
32 matches
Mail list logo
