With exposures where you have a black background and very bright
points of light you can get bounce back off film plate in the
back of the camera that look like halos. Can remember what this
effect is called.
Halation?
To the original poster: Do you smoke?
Looks like you might have a
Jerry Steve
Thanks for setting me straight - may give this a try. Have either of you tried this?
ô¿ô
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mystic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 19:19
Subject: Re: filmscanners: A Good Epson Customer Service Story
If I
on 5/11/01 8:44 PM, Arthur Entlich wrote:
How about wrap them in groups of say 10 in food wrap (cling film in the UK)
and include some silica gel which could be replaced every couple of years.
Should be very cheap and I dont see why it shouldn't work. A more expensive
but more durable
Edwin Eleazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version 3.1 of NikonScan will be out in the next week
Hmm... I wonder if this might include some attempt at fixing the jaggies
problem?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any easy solution ?
As a preface, when you project the slide much of that grain is masked by
the
surface
Harry, you have a very mild case of coma induced by the scanner..its very mild,
dont worry about it. I have seen it when scanning astrophotos with an HP
Photosmart scanner, but to a much worse degree..you can see an example at (turn
up monitor brightness first):
On Sat, 12 May 2001, tflash wrote:
points of light you can get bounce back off film plate in the
back of the camera that look like halos.
This should be visible in the original slides too. But it is not.
To the original poster: Do you smoke?
No.
Looks like you might have a residue of some
Lynn said Howcome Polaroid users aren't seeing it? Or are they just not
talking about it?
Mines an Artixscan 4000T a (I'm told) SS4000 apart from the box and the
software.
You've seen my section of sky I don't know if its any better or worse than
anyone elses, but it is definitely there.
Well,
we just started using a production LS4000 on a Mac G4. I have to tell you, it is
pretty cool. I am really proud of the job our folks did in working with Nikon to
put Digital ROC and Digital GEM on this scanner. We just scanned in some bridal
portraits. Even though we just had the film
Be sure that you are using an *optical* mouse or trackball - it will track
much more smoothly..
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Steve Greenbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any easy
Even better might be a wacom (or other) tablet, which gives the additional
benefit of pressure sensitivity. Holding a pen seems much more natural than a
mouse for fine movements and raising the pen up and down is much better than
clicking the mouse for cloning. Beyond all this I'm not subject to
While there maybe some merit to your comments about dust in the air masking
flaws in the slide being projected, I had the actual surface texture of the
projection screen in mind as well as the actual viewing distance independent
of any dust.
Laurie
Haven't been following this thread all
--
From: Mystic
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Emoticons
Assicons
Jerry SteveThanks for setting me straight - may give this a
try. Have either of you tried
Harry wrote:
I made a test slide where I took a black slide
(unexposed) and punched many needle holes into it and scanned it. So they
are plain holes now in the film. You can see the result at
www.astro.utu.fi/~hlehto/nikontest/tcrop0004small.jpg
Roger replied:
Harry, I tried the needle hole
Anything USB will track better because of the higher sampling rate.
Unfortunately the MS USB mouse I bought didn't like the KT133 VIA chipset on
the motherboard. This is a common problem with Via chipsets see:
http://www.usbman.com . When I first installed the motherboard I couldn't
use USB at
So the projection effectively helps mask the grain what a happy
coincidence
While there maybe some merit to your comments about dust in the air
masking
flaws in the slide being projected, I had the actual surface texture of
the
projection screen in mind as well as the actual viewing
16 matches
Mail list logo
