Check your local photo shop - they often have them. I believe Kodak makes
them.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 11:06 PM
Subject: filmscanners: A Digital Greenhorn's Malady! ;-)
| As the above title hints at,
I'm reading the review now - it says that different monitor resolutions
cannot be set only in the Windows NT/2000:
"Under Windows NT/2000 you lose some flexibility in that your two displays
cannot have resolutions independent of one another"
Apparently resolution can be independent under
And the write-up leads to another article on dealing with grain using
various Photoshop (and other) filters:
http://www.idahoairships.com/photoshop.htm#Film%20Grain,%20Pixellation,%20an
d%20Scanning%20Noise
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Henry Richardson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Which would be a reason for dual-boot systems, of course.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?
| My understanding
Embedding profiles in your images is a topic in and of itself - I would you
suggest you first read Dan Margulis's Professional Photoshop book first (I
don't know if the book is out for 6 yet or not).
As for the difference in images between the two monitors, the first thing to
do is to calibrate
WinMe is just Win98SE with more bells and whistles and a MS's limited
version of a GoBack program. It's a fancier park, whereas Win2K is a
rehabbed/rebuilt park.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 8:50
"Check Hardware and Software Compatibility"
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/upgrade/compat/default.asp
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 9:57 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K?
Unfortunately I've never seen that one.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Tyson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
| I should be happy to have a single group of tabs, provided
|
*We* may be but there are others out in this big wide world - many new to
scanning, to graphics. I'm sure there are those of us even besides Alan
Tyson who do. I'm also sure that Ed wants to sell to these people as well
as to those of us with higher-end equipment. After all, we already have
I like this idea very much - I can conceive of ignoring all the other
settings and just setting the Device/Raw Scan Setting tab and checking the
preview before continuing with the others (not in all cases but some).
I agree with your logic that the settings should be logically arranged -
thus
Turn it on end perhaps?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Ong" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: Tilted Scans (was: filmscanners: Vuescan feedback )
|
| On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Reilly, Bob wrote:
|
| I've found that with
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:37 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Win2K system requirements
| I would not run Win2K with a 100 MHz CPU if that is what Ironworks
| was asking. If it worked at all it would be horribly slow. Microsoft
| recommends a minimum of 133 MHz CPU.
|
| As for bus s
On my LS-30 the abort command acts with what I consider reasonable speed,
considering that the scanner has to physically stop it motion etc. As I
recall, Ed did previously improve the abort command.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would think that 1 slide target would be sufficient because you are
calibrating the scanner as a whole once, not 2 separate calibrations - one
for Kodachrome and one for Ektachrome.
I think, however, that you would be wise to also purchase the 5X7 Ektacolor
target, to compare to your monitor
To me this is good news - they are working with their software's competitor,
but hopefully it helps both of you out.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: I got a Nikon LS-40 on Loan
|
I don't think this is needed in Vuescan - if it's off just a little, then
99% of the time the first adjustment will also be off, and often the second,
third, and so forth.
PhotoShop, Corel PhotoPaint, etc. can do that afterward.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Merchant" [EMAIL
I am for this.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
| I'm curious what people think of the idea of having
| VueScan with one tab visible at a time (i.e. not
What on earth is a 3X3 matrix? Maybe someone on the list could point me to
a website description.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
| In a
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| 1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that will double
| (or halve) the size of either the preview or scan
1.My results on the Nikon LS-30 have been best with manual crop. The
corner location is manual, but that means I can set it where I want.
2.I don't think so. The crop you select is the only one used for that
scan, whether it is for raw file only or TIF or JPG or any combination.
3.
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate but unreformable
byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
2)On the Window tab uncheck "Blink crop box"
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Software City" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:54 AM
Just one more general request not related to the specifics of the changes:
I and several/many others save our Vuescan.ini file and then replace the
.ini in the new program with our saved settings. With all the changes on
layout you are anticipating, please warn us if and when a new version
Something in the nature of clean light, medium, and heavy perhaps?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shomler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| I though Ed made the
I never use the "long pass" setting. Instead, I use 2-4 passes in "Number
of Passes" and it works perfectly - no misalignment at all. I've got the
LS-30 so it should work on the LS-2000 I assume.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Message -
| From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 1:52 AM
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
|
|
| I never use the "long pass" setting. Instead, I use 2-4 passes in
"Number
| of Passes&quo
Not an answer but maybe a clue - on my PC it seems to be a heavier user of
RAM than Corel PhotoPaint does to which it exports the scan.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Nisson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 6:50 AM
Subject: filmscanners:
ROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
| IronWorks writes ...
|
| I never thought to try it. [long exposure pass] How does it benefit
| the scan?
|
| I had assumed that the normal pass would g
I am in error - it only seemed so because the image Vuescan makes in memory
uses the RAM.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Mac memory
| Not an answer
Vuescan outputs in RGB only but not in sRGB alone about 9-10 other RGB color
spaces are listed including Adobe, Bruce, Colormatch, Apple. etc.
Vuescan also does output in 8 or 16 bits at your option (and 64 bits BTW).
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Womack" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Switch brands perhaps to the Minolta Elite? Or get the Nikon LS-2000, which
should be cheaper, or a refurb LS-30 temporarily, then resell it when the
new ones come out and you've bought that one.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Leo Stachowicz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you want me to e-mail you 6.7.5 off-list perhaps? Just let me know.
Maris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Edward Wiseman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.5 Available
| ED...as 1:10
01 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.5 Available
| Reminder: Please remember that you will most likely need your
registration
| number to do that.
|
| Gordon
|
| IronWorks wrote:
|
| Try renaming 6.7.4 and then install 6.7.5 instead of over-writing 6.7.4
|
| Maris
|
|
Kodak sells them cheaper - $29 v. $39 at Praxisoft.
From their brochure:
"Order Information
Targets may be ordered for shipment within the United States from:
Kodak Professional Customer Service
Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY 14650
Tel: (800) 822-9442
Customers outside the United States
I haven't been able to access your site today or yesterday. My ISP or your
end?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:45 AM
Subject: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.4 Available
| I just released VueScan 6.7.4 for Windows,
but since that doesn't happen very often I would have
preferred
| to save some money and have them use a padded envelope. They didn't give
me
| any options, though.
|
| Tim
|
| On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:20:47 -0600, IronWorks wrote:
|
| Kodak sells them cheaper - $29 v. $39 at Praxisoft.
|
| From thei
I finally got to your site and downloaded but it's all very unusual.
I disabled Norton AV and ZoneAlarm - no change; could not even access the
site with IE, Netscape 4.72 or Opera.
I disconnected my DSL and connected by modem - connected without problem and
downloaded without problem (but ever
Berry,
I checked the rabbit image in PhotoPaint - I see a blue rabbit sitting on a
blue rock, and the numbers agree - the RGB values on average show G as being
10 over R, and B (blue) being 20 over G and *30* over R.
When I adjust the colors for a fairly equal RGB on the rock (presumably a
That web browsers take no notice of embedded color spaces is correct.
However, one can color-manage graphics for web pages - many or most graphics
applications (and the Mac monitor in its default state) are set to 1.8
gamma. The main reason for this, it seems to me, is so that WYSIWYG between
Essentially yes. Read up on it all at http://www.scantips.com/
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Marvin Demuth" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: File sizes, file formats, etc. for printing 8.5 x
11and 13 x 17...
Michael,
The rollers found by Jon at |
http://www.thefstop.com/equipment/new/onepass.html
come with pad separate from the roller, and the roller is sold separately.
Is this the case with yours? And if so, how well would the pad work by
itself, without the roller?
Maris
- Original Message
It sounds like Adobe didn't realize it was publicly accessible already.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Gail" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: PS v.6.01
| Very Strange it was there this morning.
|
|
|
Read any of Dan Margulis's "Professional Photoshop x" books. You can read
Chapter 2 - By the Numbers, which describes the procedure in detail and in a
nutshell (though it's a hard nutshell), online at
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/PP6_Chapter2.pdf
You'll get the hang of it - I've been working
Price difference is about $200.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer or Nikon?
|
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Hi All
|
| I'm pretty new to this list, but
Try PEC-12 or Kodak film cleaner and/or some compressed air. The dust on
the just-processed film may be the processor's doing in running the film
through their machine or in handling it afterward. If it's bad enough you
may be wise to try another film processor.
Maris
- Original Message
Excellent information, Michael. Thanks.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Wilkinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Mounting fluid/flatbeds
| Mounting fluid has been mentioned in connection with
sh/sc.html
| if this isn't the exact product, click on the type line in the upper right
| corner of the page to get to their products list, cuz they also list an
| anti-static fluid that they say is for drum scanners.
| Mike Moore
|
| IronWorks wrote:
|
| Excellent information, Michael. Thanks.
|
My $.02 on the unanswered points:
1.Whichever one works best for you. I prefer Vuescan - minimal
correction on many images, and I can do the correction better in Corel
PhotoPaint than I can in the scanner software.
2.Scan at the higher resolution - editing will be better, color
The same method is described by Eddie Tapp in Scanner Dust Spotting at
http://eddietapp.com/pdfs.html
He has some other good reading material there, especially 90% Method of
Color Correction NEW 9/00 which uses Dan Margulis's methods but with RGB.
Maris
- Original Message -
From:
Isn't ICE (and GEM and ROC?) already bundled with the only scanners that
have the IR channel necessary for their use?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED
The mop would be good for batch film cleaning.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Dust removal cloths
| That's them. You can buy the cloths separately in a pack of 20. But the
|
The ftp server (in Australia apparently) wouldn't answer but I found the
newest version (1.1 dated 12/31/00) at the developer's:
http://www.pankhurst.com/softdown.htm
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 11:15
This may be a problem only on the LS-2000 and Minolta Dimage for now:
From Ed's Help files:
"On the Nikon LS-2000 and the Minolta Dimage film scanners, this option
causes each scan line to be read N times before advancing to the next scan
line. On other scanners, the whole image is read N
Robert Logan keeps an archive accessible to the group at
http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Noel Charchuk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Film Scanners" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 6:31 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Introduction
| I have
To all who use the link: you have to include the "PCD5.shtml" in the URL or
you'll get a broken-link response from kodak - just clicking won't do it.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "AFA" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:19 AM
Subject:
I only know about the Epson 1200U and I don't think much of the software. I
will send screenshots of it to you offlist.
I use Vuescan for film (pending acquisition of a filmscanner) and I just
purchased Silverfast for reflective images and for objects - superior
controls, and they recently
It must be a cached page - I saw 6.7 soon after Ed's message posted and
downloaded it last night. That would be about 1-2 AM Chicago time.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Gail" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:22 AM
Subject: Re:
RE: filmscanners: Canon FS2710 - any good?As to the Minolta, only the
Minolta Elite to my knowledge.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Finch, Jason V
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 4:15 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Canon FS2710 - any good?
Paul,
the Canon
Where did you see the refurb for $499? I'm in the market and that's exactly
my idea - to pick up an LS-30 since the IVs are or will soon be out.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Edwin Eleazer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:28 PM
Subject:
ra.com/cgi-local/frameph2.pl/%3Dscn/%3D3853479
|
| This place has great prices and came highly recommended by some other
| photographers. Get the LS-30, and you won't be dissapointed.
| Edwin
|
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of IronWor
I downloaded these previously and now compared them - looking specifically
at the leather bag in the middle and the violet background of the square to
it's right (at 300%) , I see better color saturation in the tiff and finer
color gradations in the tiff - the jpeg violet seems to convert into
To supplement my last (recent) message I am enclosing samples from the
orange of the child's play blocks - both were cropped to 10X12 pixels, and
the jpeg was saved without (further) compression.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Maddock" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed,
Any problem with this or reason not to?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 7:29 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan suggestion
| I always save my previous .ini file and simply copy it into the
My understanding as to a short answer is that essentially the gamma curve is
inverse to the curve of the phosphors' luminosity - one is concave, the
other convex. I'm really not clear either, though. I've read a lot but it
hasn't really hit home.
Maris
- Original Message -
From:
In line with shAF's white and black point setting suggestion, there is an
excellent site at http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/index.htm, very professional
but understandable and lots of how-to-do-its.
There is a monitor calibration section there, and a good walk-through of the
white and black point
Thank you shAf!
I especially appreciate his articles A Profiling Primer at
http://www.creativepro.com/story/news/0,1819,5710,00.html and Color-Accurate
Inkjets Made EZ (review of 3 profiling software programs) at
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/5708.html
Maris
- Original Message
It is - see my post of 12 hours ago.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Sumtingwong" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:49 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
| I would have to do more research on this. A well informed friend
And please don't forget us Corel PhotoPaint users and the PSP users like my
sister.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.6 Available
| In a message dated 2/1/2001 0:17:51
Start reading here: CGSD - Gamma Correction Home Page:
http://www.cgsd.com/papers/gamma.html and read on.
All the facts you want and then some.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Christiansen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject:
It stands for black. The letter "B" was already taken for something else, I
don't recall what, in the printing industry.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Christiansen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 9:06 PM
Subject: filmscanners: The K in
I don't think we'll ever be even mostly paperless. Paper has 2 values I
can't see computers replacing despite technology improvements in ways we
can't even imagine now.
Ease of use in all too many instances - flipping back and forth between
pages of a book, or a filmscanner review, or often
I don't know if technically it is vignetting, but I find it distracting and
therefore objectionable.
Sorry.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:33 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Vignetting?
|
| Would
The Electronic Communications Act 2000 is a start.
http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/2007.htm
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Tassi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
|
Does the Acer have the IR channel that I understand is necessary to make use
of Vuescan's "Clean" feature?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Marquis-Kyle" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720
I see Acer has a new Scanwit 2740S out which now includes Digital ICE.
If you know yet, any problems in Vuescan supporting the 2740S, and does the
2740S now therefore have the IR channel your clean feature uses?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And we now have the paperless office that was predicted 5 years ago.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Berry Ives" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
| on 1/29/01 2:21 PM, Michael Wilkinson at [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Edmonds" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 6:57 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Power Crisis and UPS
| FWIW, I protect my system with an APC SmartUPS 1000 and with everything
| running (including scanner, modem,
But isn't there solar power in sunny California?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Power Crisis and UPS
| Actually, a power company and working statewide power
It sounds like the format of the scanned result may be wrong somehow. Try
changing the format first either in your scanning software or in Photoshop
and maybe some clue will develop.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Sara Jane Boyers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
This message will also go out in plain
text in case HTML and attachments are rejected.Per Scanning - The
Professional Way, by Sybil Ihric Emil Ihric (1995 so it's
dated):
"Charge_Coupled Devices (CCDs)
Flatbed, sheet_fed, and hand_held scanners, dedicated film and slide
scanners, and
Get Vuescan for $40 (free demo) at http://www.hamrick.com/
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "fotografia - tomasz zakrzewski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 6:21 AM
Subject: filmscanners: orange mask
| Do Nikon filmscanners come with special
I downloaded successfully shortly after you posted
the WhaleMail Fwd: at 11:04 PM.
IronWorks
- Original Message -
From:
Ezio
To: Mystic ; Filmscanners
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:06
AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Here's a
place...
Yes ... right click
At Vuescan - Hamrick Software: http://www.hamrick.com/
IronWorks
- Original Message -
From: "Lynda Farabee" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: newbie at scanning.
Where do I get Vuescan?
--Lynda
82 matches
Mail list logo
