Vuescan did a better job, also lots more detail in the shadow areas. I would say
Vuescan did a better job on the scratches too but this only based on small web
images. Thanks for the comparison..
"Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happened to try scanning an old (circa 1980) kodak 100
Herm wrote:
Vuescan did a better job, also lots more detail in the shadow
areas. I would say Vuescan did a better job on the scratches
too but this only based on small web images. Thanks for the
comparison..
Overall the results from Vuescan were far more useful - mostly because of
the colour
