I want this this is a good idea. I want it.
- Collin Ong
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Mark T. wrote:
At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
why would you want to seperate these? to allow the
option of grain removal WITHOUT clean?
Yes, or to allow varying intensities of clean without
grain
I have no strong feelings about this, but I don't see how it
could hurt, and it might help. It doesn't sound hard to do.
Hersch
At 04:28 PM 03/14/2001 +1000, you wrote:
At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
why would you want to seperate these? to allow the
option of grain removal WITHOUT
From: "Mark T." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:28:11 +1000
At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
why would you want to seperate these? to allow th
Yes, or to allow varying intensities of clean without
grain removal. They should be two separate drop down
options, and with the interface changes in 7.0 there's
plenty of space.
I for one would like to be able to see the effect of
grain removal on its own without having to combine it
with
I had understood that grain removal was a by-product of the ICE-type
cleaning and therefore could not be separated. If it can, certainly I
agree
that should be an independent option.
Not sure about VueScan, but ASF's GEM and ROC do not depend on ICE. Two
separate sources for this
If I remember correctly, about a week or two ago, someone on the list had a post
that also said that ICE or its equivalent needed the IR channel but that GEM ad
ROC or their equivalent operated independently and did not need the IR Channel.
Gordon
Not sure about VueScan, but ASF's GEM and ROC
"Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had understood that grain removal was a by-product of the ICE-type
cleaning and therefore could not be separated. If it can, certainly I
agree
that should be an independent option.
No, grain removal and dust/scratch removal are different
Jules writes ...
I think many on the list would vote for a separate
checkbox control to enable grain removal
independently of the clean/scrub/scour setting.
but scrub = clean + grain removal and
scour = clean + heavier grain removal
AFAIK the clean algorithm does change between the
At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
why would you want to seperate these? to allow the
option of grain removal WITHOUT clean?
Yes, or to allow varying intensities of clean without
grain removal. They should be two separate drop down
options, and with the interface changes in 7.0 there's
In a message dated 3/6/2001 6:00:02 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there any chance we'll see the next version
of VS present the scan properly in "monitor space"??? To reiterate
... if you ask for AdobeRGB color space, Vuescan will show you
AdobeRGB data in monitor space ... and
Speaking of which ... is there any chance we'll see the next version
of VS present the scan properly in "monitor space"??? To reiterate
... if you ask for AdobeRGB color space, Vuescan will show you
AdobeRGB data in monitor space ... and your scans will appear
under-saturated in
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Alan wrote:
I agree that the dialog box would be a good thing, but I do
have to point out that directory creation already happens,
and automatically, if you enter a pathname into the raw,
TIFF, or JPEG file name fields!
Which is nice, but less foolproof than the
I find I have to hit it 2 or 3 times before it takes effect.
At 12:40 AM 03/06/2001 -0500, you wrote:
A more responsive abort button would be nice. Not infrequently I find
myself having made a mistake but spending a good deal of time while the
scan is occurring waiting for a window when I can
In a message dated 3/5/2001 5:33:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an alternative to scroll bars, would it be possible
to use instead a hand to grab the image with the mouse
and pull it to the location one wants, like ACDSee?
The problem with this is two-fold - clicking in the
middle
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
YES !
Thanks Ed !
[]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan
"Hersch Nitikman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re the abort button:
I find I have to hit it 2 or 3 times before it takes effect.
I suspect this is more to do with how well the scanner responds to
an abort instruction while scanning than vuescan itself.
Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with this is two-fold - clicking in the
middle of the crop box already moves the crop box,
and dragging the image only lets you move it one
screen at a time (scroll bars give you quick scrolling
anywhere within the image).
I for one would prefer that
Rob Geraghty wrote:
The only interface feature of vuescan which regularly drives me crazy is
resizing the outline for the crop. Sometimes dragging an edge moves the
whole box, sometimes it's possible to set the area outside the scannable
area, sometimes it drags the corner instead of the side
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/5/2001 5:33:29 PM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an alternative to scroll bars, would it be
possible
to use instead a hand to grab the image with the
mouse
and pull it to the location one wants, like
ACDSee?
The problem with
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Ong" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, shAf wrote:
I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT sof
Joel asks ...
... This raises the question of what the zoom
feature is for, ...
One of the few features I appreciated about Nikonscan was the ability
to zoom in and focus. Without this capability I would have never
realized the focusing issues which affect scanning with my LS-2000
Jules writes ...
I think many on the list would vote for a separate
checkbox control to
enable grain removal independently of the
clean/scrub/scour setting.
but scrub = clean + grain removal
and
scour = clean + heavier grain removal
why would you want to seperate these? to allow
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| "Hersch Nitikman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re the abort button:
| I find I have to hit it 2 or 3 times before it takes effect.
|
| I suspect this is more to do with
I see. This raises the question of what the zoom
feature is for, and it sounds like you intend it to be
useful for cropping in the main.
Yes, it's mainly useful for adjusting the cropping more precisely.
As well as exposure I would venture to guess...
work!
Bob Kehl
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback
every day and scanning less frequently. Therefore something more standard
would be greatly beneficial.
Bob Kehl
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
Ed Hamrick wrote:
I realize that I could make the cursor modal, where
it sometimes moves the crop box and other times
moves the zoomed image, but I'd prefer to avoid
modal things - it hurts ease of use for beginning
users.
I tend to agree. I've had my fill of "gimmickey" cursors, and the
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
Manually adjusting exposure, also brings up a point. I wish the
number which would be input cou
: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
In a message dated 3/6/2001 9:54:57 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see. This raises the question of what the zoom
feature is for, and it sounds like you intend it to be
useful for cropping in the main.
Yes, it's mainly useful for ad
Ed - I hope you _really_ wanted all of this feed back. :-) It sure beats
talking about CD-Rs and printers. Most of my comments just reiterate what
others have already told you, but it never hurts to repeat good ideas.
I think your rearrangement of the options is a very good idea. I am
Yes, this already works in VueScan. Turn off "Options|Auto exposure"
and set "Options|RGB exposure" and "Options|Infrared exposure".
This controls the same SCSI fields as Nikon changes when you set
the "Analog gain" option in NikonScan.
Ed,
As a VueScan and NikonScan user (I have an
Ed. Something along this line and what Hersh said earlier. I find the
Scan memory odd. It has really no advantage unless you want another file
of the same scan. I would prefer changing it to something like PreScan,
which will do the scan, not output a file, and allow me to check the
changes
Gordon writes ...
Ed. Something along this line and what Hersh said earlier.
I find the Scan memory odd. It has really no
advantage unless you want another file of the
same scan. ...
Exactly! Keep in mind, you, at least some of us, want another file.
If you scan into a color
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
These are the main things I'm thinking of - let me know if you
don't like these changes or if you'd like to see things done
differently:
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out"
Ed writes ...
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
These are the main things I'm thinking of - ...
If you have strong feelings about my doing things
differently, please let me know soon.
I like these
Ed,
Forgive me for not replying to your list. I will in another post.
Yesterday, I fired up my LS-30 for the first time in several months to
scan a Kodachrome slide. I was blown away by the improvement in VueScan in
handling Kodachromes! I went into Nikonscan just to verify that it wasn't
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Reorganize the tabs on the right side to make them
a bit more logical and useful (these suggestions came
from a helpful user):
The suggested reorganization would definitely be an improvement, and the
groupings are logical. However, I would
: Monday, March 05, 2001 5:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
These are the main things I'm thinking of - let me know if you
don't
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| 1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that will double
| (or halve) the size of either the pr
ch 05, 2001 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| Ed,
| Forgive me for not replying to your list. I will in another post.
| Yesterday, I fired up my LS-30 for the first time in several months to
| scan a Kodachrome slide. I was blown away by the im
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window
'live', i.e., when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the
preview. That would make a whole lot of difference.
At 05:56 AM 03/05/2001 -0500, you wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the
VueScan
user interface, and
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:43:20 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate but unreformable
byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
The "Clean" option shouldn't visibly soften the image. Is it softening it?
Is this with Kodachrome film or
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:46:35 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That
would make a whole lot of difference.
The problem with this is that the
IronWorks writes ...
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate
but unreformable byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
...
I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT soften the image except
in the regions where dust was removed, BUT that softening kicks in for
"scrub"
Ed wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface...These are the main things I'm thinking of clip
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that will double
(or halve) the size of either the preview or scan images. While
zoomed, the preview or scan window will
Ed Hamrick wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
The suggestions sound good (especially the preview zoom). There's another thing I
would find useful (although I might be a minority of one).
I still find
shAF writes:
(4) I think we all need to come up with how to better set the file paths
... or maybe I simply need to understand your current philosophy and
experiment more. But I wish I could consistently store the settings in a
specific location, independent of where I put my projects. Can I
shAF writes:
(4) I think we all need to come up with how to better set the file paths
... or maybe I simply need to understand your current philosophy and
experiment more. But I wish I could consistently store the settings in a
specific location, independent of where I put my projects. Can I
shAF writes:
(4) I think we all need to come up with how to better set the file paths
... or maybe I simply need to understand your current philosophy and
experiment more. But I wish I could consistently store the settings in a
specific location, independent of where I put my projects. Can I
Hersh wote:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That would
make a whole lot of difference.
That was an incarnation in a much earlier 6.x Vuescan version (possibly a
Beta), and I liked it
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, shAf wrote:
I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT soften the image except
in the regions where dust was removed, BUT that softening kicks in for
"scrub" "scour" because of his grain removal algorithm is used(?)
Ed,
I think many on the list would vote for a
05, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
| user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
[snipped]
What I mean is that if I set rotation to 90ccw, I'd like to see that happen
to the image in the preview window. And if I propose a change in 'white
point', e.g., that the effect would show in the preview, so I could change
my mind if I didn't like it. Or, if I change the film type, the effect
YES !
Thanks Ed !
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
I'm thinking about some improvements
Kodachrome 6.7.4. I'll load 6.7.5 tonight let you know.
Sorry for the incomplete post.
Ken Jaskot
- Original Message -
The "Clean" option shouldn't visibly soften the image. Is it softening
it?
Is this with Kodachrome film or Ektachrome film? Is this with
VueScan 6.7.5 (this
Maybe my request reflected a lack of appreciation of where else to go for
the same features.
At 06:29 PM 03/05/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Hersh wote:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That
Collin wrote:
I think many on the list would vote for a separate checkbox control to
enable grain removal independently of the clean/scrub/scour setting.
I'd vote for that. Not necessarily because it would help a lot - more because
at the moment I have no way to tell what difference it makes
Michael wrote:
I concur, and that recent addition (not having to go to the Vuescan
program files for the "crops") was really helpful. Paths are tough,
and any improvements here (and there've been many) are welcome.
IMO something like the Microsoft Common Dialog Box would be a great boon
for
Ed Hamrick wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
The only interface feature of vuescan which regularly drives me crazy is
resizing the outline for the crop. Sometimes dragging an edge moves the
whole box,
Title: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
on 3/5/01 3:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
I just started
Joel Wilcox wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that
will double
(or halve) the size of either the preview or scan
images. While
zoomed, the preview or scan window will have scroll
bars.
As an alternative to scroll bars, would it be
Rob Geraghty wrote:
IMO something like the Microsoft Common Dialog Box would be a great boon
for setting the paths. That way it's done visually and you don't have to
remember or type the text by hand. I'm talking about interface style when
I mention the common dialog box - it would
Alan wrote:
I agree that the dialog box would be a good thing, but I do
have to point out that directory creation already happens,
and automatically, if you enter a pathname into the raw,
TIFF, or JPEG file name fields!
Which is nice, but less foolproof than the common dialog box.
If you
Something in the nature of clean light, medium, and heavy perhaps?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shomler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| I though Ed made
A more responsive abort button would be nice. Not infrequently I find
myself having made a mistake but spending a good deal of time while the
scan is occurring waiting for a window when I can abort. Not sure if
this might be due to something about my system though.
John M.
65 matches
Mail list logo
