I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator
rights.
I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
"finale encountered an error. please reinstall Finale".
I had not yet registered the prog.
Should I register it first with administrator
At 4/5/2006 05:10 AM, themark wrote:
I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator rights.
I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
finale encountered an error. please reinstall Finale.
There are 2 possible problems that I can think of.
- Original Message -
From: Phil Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale 2006 Win - not possible to run it
withoutadministrator rights?
At 4/5/2006 05:10 AM, themark wrote:
I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000
Has anybody got any experience with sharing Finale for Windows
on a Citrix application server (Citrix Presentation Server 4.0) ?
Is it possible ? Any problems, e.g. with MIDI playback / input ?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Jan Angermueller
___
Finale
At 4/5/2006 07:39 AM, Jan Angermüller wrote:
Has anybody got any experience with sharing Finale for Windows
on a Citrix application server (Citrix Presentation Server 4.0) ?
Is it possible ? Any problems, e.g. with MIDI playback / input ?
I have run other programs on Citrix.
I would be
On 5 Apr 2006 at 11:10, themark wrote:
I installed Finale 2006 on a Win 2000 Pro system using administrator
rights.
I need to run it from a normal user account. I try to run it and I get
finale encountered an error. please reinstall Finale.
I had not yet registered the prog.
Should I
On 5 Apr 2006 at 7:50, Phil Daley wrote:
At 4/5/2006 07:39 AM, Jan Angermüller wrote:
Has anybody got any experience with sharing Finale for Windows
on a Citrix application server (Citrix Presentation Server 4.0) ?
Is it possible ? Any problems, e.g. with MIDI playback / input ?
I
At 01:39 PM 4/5/06 +0200, Jan Angermüller wrote:
Has anybody got any experience with sharing Finale for Windows
on a Citrix application server (Citrix Presentation Server 4.0) ?
Is it possible ? Any problems, e.g. with MIDI playback / input ?
Others have already responded, but I'll mention that
On 5 Apr 2006 at 9:34, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 01:39 PM 4/5/06 +0200, Jan Angermüller wrote:
Has anybody got any experience with sharing Finale for Windows
on a Citrix application server (Citrix Presentation Server 4.0) ?
Is it possible ? Any problems, e.g. with MIDI playback / input ?
At 4/5/2006 10:32 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Citrix *never* worked that way. It was always multi-user, running on
top of the Terminal Server version of Windows NT. That is, you were
always getting an individual desktop for each user. That was the
whole justification for its existence.
That's
And if that doesn't work, try http://www.tfront.com
Erica Buxbaum wrote:
http://www.jwpepper.com
J.W. Pepper--not to be picky...
Erica Buxbaum
*/Eric Dannewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
Try gwpepper.com
Dick Hauser wrote:
Sorry for the topic infringement, but I'm not too
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
And if that doesn't work, try http://www.tfront.com
Thanks for the suggestions, I tried:
http://www.jwpepper.com
http://www.tfront.com (Theodore Front)
https://www.boosey.com (Boosey Hawkes)
Looking for:
Henryk Gorecki's
Recitatives and
At 4/5/2006 01:39 PM, Dick Hauser wrote:
Henryk Gorecki's
Recitatives and Ariosos 'Lerchenmusik' for clarinet, cello, and piano
Op. 53 (1984); ca 45'
and had no success. Guess I'm out of luck.
I typed that into Google and the first response was:
I suspected this was coming
http://tinyurl.com/pwcbs
-Karen
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Well, if you are making a list, you can add http://www.lucksmusic.net/ but they don't have this particular title, either. Do you know who publishes it? Maybe you will have to contact them to either order it or finda distributor.Erica BuxbaumDick Hauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 5,
For people who didn't click Karen's link -- Apple has introduced a
public beta of Boot Camp, an officially-sanctioned and supported dual-
boot solution. It was already possible to install Windows XP on a
MacIntel machine using third-party hacks, but now Apple has decided
to offer their own
At 10:32 AM 4/5/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Citrix *never* worked that way. It was always multi-user, running on
top of the Terminal Server version of Windows NT. That is, you were
always getting an individual desktop for each user.
I used a beta version back when they were first hawking
Try Eble Music in Iowa City.
http://www.eble.com/
Ronald M. Krentzman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dick Hauser
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:40 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT Where to purchase
On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:39, Dick Hauser wrote:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
And if that doesn't work, try http://www.tfront.com
Thanks for the suggestions, I tried:
http://www.jwpepper.com
http://www.tfront.com (Theodore Front)
https://www.boosey.com (Boosey
On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:59, Karen wrote:
I suspected this was coming
http://tinyurl.com/pwcbs
This is not going to last long, though. Microsoft recently announced
that Windows Vista (the next major release of Windows, the release of
which was recently delayed into 2007) will not boot under
Actually, EFI isn't Apple, its Intel
http://www.intel.com/technology/efi/
And Apple updated EFI with BIOS support.so...it will run.
And Vista will run.
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:59, Karen wrote:
I suspected this was coming
http://tinyurl.com/pwcbs
On 05.04.2006 Darcy James Argue wrote:
For people who didn't click Karen's link -- Apple has introduced a public beta
of Boot Camp, an officially-sanctioned and supported dual-boot solution. It was
already possible to install Windows XP on a MacIntel machine using third-party
hacks, but now
The report I read said that Vista would boot under EFI, but it would
require a 64-bit processor (the current MacIntels are 32-bit).
At any rate, Apple is building Boot Camp support directly into OS X
10.5, so clearly they are pretty confident they will be able to get
Vista to boot on their
I think it will be interesting to see if WinXP can be registered on the new
CPU for those that will be trying to transfer their old WinXP to the
IntelMAC.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Johannes Gebauer
Sent: Wednesday, April 05,
The answer is yes.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 05 Apr 2006, at 3:19 PM, Richard Willis wrote:
I think it will be interesting to see if WinXP can be registered on
the new
CPU for those that will be trying to transfer their old WinXP to
This is how it all works...it is quite interesting.
http://tinyurl.com/fknzx
Apparently, a virtual partition is created and that is where XP
lives. My only question is if this firmware update that allows
Window to run on the Intel Macs poses potential virus/worm etc.
issues that up until
I think you have that wrong.
The coolest thing about the assistant is that it *does a
non-destructive repartitioning of your boot drive*. In other words, you
don't need unpartitioned space to install Boot Camp, just free space
within your Mac's existing boot partition. Choose your partition
This was not the case when I purchased it a few years ago. The Boosey
website may be mistaken.
Another place to try would be Educational Music Service in Chester, NY.
Ronald M. Krentzman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David W. Fenton
Naw...I understand the concept that was in the linked article that's
why I put virtual in parenthesisbut maybe that was a poor way
of saying it.
By virtual I meant a partition that can be created without having
to reformat the whole drive like we did in the past. I guess non-
On Apr 5, 2006, at 11:32 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This is not going to last long, though. Microsoft recently announced
that Windows Vista (the next major release of Windows, the release of
which was recently delayed into 2007) will not boot under EFI (or
whatever the Apple equivalent to the
Here's the answer:
Along with Boot Camp, Apple has posted firmware updates to all
their Intel Macs today. These firmware updates provide EFI with
BIOS support, allowing all Intel Macs to boot operating systems
such as Windows XP and Linux. This should also allow the Intel Macs
to boot
So, from what I understand from reading and asking around this is the
scoop thus far on security issues.
EFI is very well locked down on the Intel machines so the firmware
update shouldn't be a problem.
Viruses and spyware can still infect the windows partition on these
machines.
Here is a fix if anyone has a midi interface that isn't yet supported
on the new Intel Macs.
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2006012807001
-K
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
33 matches
Mail list logo
