Kim,
Have you tried deleting the existing parts from the list, then create a new
set of parts?
Vince Leonard
www.finalebook.com
www.sibeliusbook.com
**
It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance.
(http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf000301
Good points Ray--
I also have been deeply affected by the availability of music on
line, and using the computer for composing..
Many years ago, I decided to try to compose..but had NO idea how to
progress. My idea then--which I STILL follow-- was to, as TOTALLY as
possible, keep myself f
On Mar 8, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Ray Horton wrote:
Yes, Sousa was right:
"These talking machines are going to ruin the artistic development
of music in this country. When I was a boy...in front of every
house in the summer evenings, you would find young people together
singing the songs of the
Hi,
the problem seems to have gone away. Maybe I had been using too many
resources, or my notebook was sick, or whatever. Today I tried again, and
scrolling playback worked fine, also in page view.
Thanks for the help, anyway,
Kurt
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
Can someone solve this problem for me?
I have a score that consists of Vocal, Piano, Bass and Drums. I add
the staves (above those) for big band. When I was through inputting
all the entries, I go to Manage Parts, then Generate Parts. All parts
are generated except for bass and drums. They
The lighthouses were pretty, though.
RBH
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Ray Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And as far as the new technology for composers - it has freed me, who is
both a terrible pianist and could never get an ink pen to work worth a
darn. Bac
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Ray Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as far as the new technology for composers - it has freed me, who is
> both a terrible pianist and could never get an ink pen to work worth a
> darn. Back when I had to copy stuff out by hand I got a fraction of the
> musi
Firat, I agree with nearly everything you three are saying. But this
conversation reminds me of a group discussion I was a part of , some
years back, one in which a lady older than I was wistfully saying that
the last lighthouse on some island somewhere had closed, and it was a
shame, etc. etc
If yours is an "Urtext edition" (or bettter a "critical" edition), do
exactly as you have. Keep accidentals unless they actually conflict with
modern rules. Add cautionarys where they help to clarify, but put them
in brackets, or make them smaller.
Some publishers, like Henle, use square bracket
At 10:30 PM -0600 3/7/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting how much confidence a group of musicians is putting in record
company executives to know and deliver "what's good." Who here has not had
the experience of having music thrown in the trash without being
considered by some executive typ
On Mar 7, 2008, at 5:51 PM, John Howell wrote:
In my opinion it is NEVER a mistake to clarify something that might
cause confusion. Your mileage may differ.
Yes it very well may. Sometimes the clarification adds another layer
of confusion, like my point earlier about parentheses or not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting how much confidence a group of musicians is putting in record
company executives to know and deliver "what's good." Who here has not had
the experience of having music thrown in the trash without being
considered by some executive type or other gatekeeper? Cer
12 matches
Mail list logo
