Steve Currington wrote:
Not trying to start a product war but I thought you might be interested in this.
whether you agree or disagree is you own judgement..
Whether you needs are different than the reviewer is also over to you to decide
for yourself.
sonicstrategy.net » Finale 2010 vs
Thanks, Eric, for the advice on the Applescript solution. I'll check it out. My
sister-in-law (who's a school-district IS tech) helped me find the answer to
the primary problem. After selecting Read and Write for everyone in Sharing
and Permissions, I had to click on the Actions button, and
Hello!
Where should the dynamics be put (horizontally) when the dynamic change
is on a note with preceding grace note(s)? Below the main note or below
the grace note?
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
I recommend the main note.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jari Williamsson
jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se wrote:
Hello!
Where should the dynamics be put (horizontally) when the dynamic change is
on a note with preceding grace note(s)? Below the main note or below the
grace note?
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Hello!
Where should the dynamics be put (horizontally) when the dynamic change
is on a note with preceding grace note(s)? Below the main note or below
the grace note?
In my experience and opinion, it looks best when put below
the main note. I've always
My opinion is that it should be under the grace note, since to me,
that's part of the ensuing phrase. But attach it to the main note so
as not to have it reduced to 75%. At least on FinMac 2K7.
J D Thomas
ThomaStudios
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Hello!
Where
On 18 Jan 2010 at 20:30, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Where should the dynamics be put (horizontally) when the dynamic change
is on a note with preceding grace note(s)? Below the main note or below
the grace note?
Below the main note.
This raises the question of how the new expression handling
Hello!
This is the situation: A part (Tchaikowsky) has a 4 measure cut from the
music, so the part goes ...53, 54, 55 and then directly to measure 60.
The measure number 60 is notated in the middle of the system where the
jump occurs.
Is there any standard symbol when measure numbers are cut
David W. Fenton wrote:
This raises the question of how the new expression handling sizes
dynamics. Since note-attached expressions don't exist any more
(right?), I assume that you don't have the problem of a dynamic
marking attached to a grace note being much smaller than one attached
to a
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Hello!
This is the situation: A part (Tchaikowsky) has a 4 measure cut from the
music, so the part goes ...53, 54, 55 and then directly to measure 60.
The measure number 60 is notated in the middle of the system where the
jump occurs.
Is there any standard symbol when
My opinion is that it should be under the grace note, since
to me, that's part of the ensuing phrase. But attach it to
the main note so as not to have it reduced to 75%. At least
on FinMac 2K7.
J D Thomas
I have a set of articulations for string numbers made in the shape designer
using
Hi Jari,
Yes, arrow + number is the way I've always seen this done (for B'way shows,
etc).
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com
On 18 Jan 2010, at 3:35 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Hello!
This is the situation: A part (Tchaikowsky) has a 4 measure cut from the
Use the CombiNumerals font:
http://www.fontspace.com/the-fontsite/combinumerals
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com
On 18 Jan 2010, at 3:07 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
My opinion is that it should be under the grace note, since
to me, that's part of the ensuing phrase.
Thanks for the link. It comes up infrequently enough that it's not worth
changing fonts. Does the same thing happen in later versions than 2007?
Use the CombiNumerals font:
http://www.fontspace.com/the-fontsite/combinumerals
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Jari:
This is the situation: A part (Tchaikowsky) has a 4 measure cut from
the music, so the part goes ...53, 54, 55 and then directly to measure
60. The measure number 60 is notated in the middle of the system where
the jump occurs.
Is there any standard symbol when measure numbers are cut
Jari asked:
Where should the dynamics be put (horizontally) when the dynamic
change is on a note with preceding grace note(s)? Below the main note
or below the grace note?
Seems to me the indication of the dynamic change should go at the point
in the music at which the dynamic change occurs or
Hi all,
Looks like my parts prep is requiring a bound book parts printed on A3 paper.
Anybody in the U.S. have any clue how to accomplish this? I'm in Vermont, and
nobody around here has paper wider than 11x17 (much less a printer capable of
using it). Any New York folks ever work with A3 (and
I wrote:
If the intent is for the change to begin on the principal note, it is
inherently misleading to put the indication of the change on the main
note.
I meant to write,
If the intent is for the change to begin on the principal note, it is
inherently misleading to put the indication of
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
The measure number has no particular significance other than being the
address (to borrow a computer term) of the measure. The only important
consideration is that the measure number of a particular measure should
be the same in the score and in all parts. Instead of
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
Looks like my parts prep is requiring a bound book parts printed on A3 paper.
Anybody in the U.S. have any clue how to accomplish this? I'm in Vermont, and
nobody around here has paper wider than 11x17 (much less a printer capable of
using it). Any New York folks
Noel,
I don't get the enthusiasm for reinventing the wheel here. This situation pops
up in the Broadway pit all the time. The arrow works, and is far more concise
than the alternate solutions being proposed.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com
On 18 Jan 2010, at 4:24
On Mon, January 18, 2010 5:00 pm, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
A3 paper is a bit larger on the smaller dimension, and a bit narrower on
the larger one, so first thing I'd do is ask if they would accept US
tabloid size instead of A3. Next, both Wausau and Neenah brand papers
are sold in the US in A3
Have you tried a paper supplier like Xpedx? Unfortunately, the closest one
to Vermont appears to be in Wilmington, MA, but maybe there's a different
supplier closer to you. You can order so-called parent sheets, which are
25x38, and have them cut to order. A printer that can handle 11x17 should
At 11:02 PM +0100 1/18/10, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
The measure number has no particular significance other than being
the address (to borrow a computer term) of the measure. The only
important consideration is that the measure number of a particular
measure should be
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Noel,
I don't get the enthusiasm for reinventing the wheel here. This situation pops
up in the Broadway pit all the time. The arrow works, and is far more concise
than the alternate solutions being proposed.
Well, I know as much about the conventions in Broadway
I would suggest numbering all of the measures around the cut. I think
the arrow could help, also.
RBH
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
The measure number has no particular significance other than being
the address (to borrow a computer term) of the measure. The only
--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz bath...@maltedmedia.com wrote:
We're waiting for an answer on accepting the U.S. size, and
I know where to
get the paper (not cheap, even for standard weight).
The question is who PRINTS this size in copy shops? I can't
find anybody who
has a
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
The question is who PRINTS this size in copy shops? I can't find
anybody who has a machine that can accept it.
Any equipment that prints 11 x 17 sized paper will also print A3, so if
you happen to have a printer which handles 11 x 17 paper, you can a copy
I was assuming both the measure before and the measure after the cut would be
numbered, with the arrow between them. (In B'way music, every measure is
numbered.)
Including both numbers without the arrow would be confusing. With the arrow,
it's perfectly clear what is going on.
Cheers,
- DJA
Thanks everyone ... I'll just have to convince Staples or the UPS Store that
their machines really handle it!
The reason I'm asking is that this is the first time I've been asked to
deliver physical parts in many a year. I just send PDFs and they print to
taste; this time, they want paper.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
I was assuming both the measure before and the measure after
the cut would be numbered, with the arrow between them.
(In B'way music, every measure is numbered.)
Including both numbers without the arrow would be confusing.
With the arrow, it's perfectly clear what is
I go for the main note. In most cases, I think the grace note would
be played slightly softer than the main note (unless it is marked
with an accent. However, this would not be true if the grace intended
to be played as an appoggiatura in 18th-century style (on the beat).
BTW, Finale 2010
it might be easier to get someone to print in germany instead. besides
saving on postage, you also save on the work involved.
Thanks everyone ... I'll just have to convince Staples or the UPS Store
that
their machines really handle it!
The reason I'm asking is that this is the first time
At 9:35 PM +0100 1/18/10, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Hello!
This is the situation: A part (Tchaikowsky) has a 4 measure cut from
the music, so the part goes ...53, 54, 55 and then directly to
measure 60. The measure number 60 is notated in the middle of the
system where the jump occurs.
Is
Harold Owen wrote:
I go for the main note. In most cases, I think the grace note would be
played slightly softer than the main note (unless it is marked with an
accent. However, this would not be true if the grace intended to be
played as an appoggiatura in 18th-century style (on the beat).
35 matches
Mail list logo
