Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread rglan
At 8:21 AM +1000 19/4/12, David McKay wrote: Raglan is the name of a village which is en route to Sydney, from Bathurst, where I live. it's also a very famous surfing break in N.Z. :-) Wondering if you have ever transcribed The London Derrière? Transcribed for what? As it happens I have

Re: [Finale] Andouille

2012-04-20 Thread rglan
Memorias d'Andouille Le 18/4/12 21:24 PM +0200, Claude Guéganno a écrit: Andouille mailing list andoui...@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/andouille Lol :-D ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Rod McDonald
Hi David! I am amazed anyone actually lives at RAGLAN!!..I still use 2011..first year I haven't upgraded since 2005. Rod. Katoomba. -Original Message- From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of rglan Sent: Friday, 20 April 2012 6:17 PM To: finale@shsu.edu

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread rglan
At 6:44 PM +1000 20/4/12, Rod McDonald wrote: I am amazed anyone actually lives at RAGLAN!!.. But are you amazed that RAGLAN actually lives? ;-) I still use 2011..first year I haven't upgraded since 2005 That's encouraging, merci ___ Finale mailing

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Raymond Horton
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:17 AM, rglan rg...@free.fr wrote: You seem to be the only person here currently using 2011, everyone else seems to have jumped from 2010--2012. I wonder why? I guess I'll just ... o/ (Hand raised.) WinFin2011 I like it - no real problems, Raymond Horton Bass

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Patterson
I can only think of one reason not to go from Fin11 to Fin12, esp. if you can use the Unicode. The Score Manager changes call for a little adjustment in how you do things, but the significant regression matters only if you need to enter a lot of instrumental music from before 1900 into Finale. In

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Steve Parker
2011 mac fine for me. Steve P. On 19 Apr 2012, at 13:20, Christopher Smith christopher.sm...@videotron.ca wrote: On Thu Apr 19, at ThursdayApr 19 2:14 AM, dershem wrote: The only option I would like that 2010 doesn't have is to hide staves in the piano part, and I am used to doing

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Harold Owen
Hello everyone, It's been a while since I posted here. I'm using 2011 and have no major complaints. I'm on Mac using System 10.5.8. I'll consider getting Finale 2012B when it's available and when I can upgrade my system. I really like the convenience of using XML with friends who have

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Apple also has released 10.6 for free in the hopes that people will use that and then upgrade to Lion. You might want to check it out. Going from 10.5 to 10.6 resulted in speed increases for my macs Sent from my iSomething -- On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Harold Owen hjo...@uoregon.edu wrote:

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Aaron Sherber
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:17 AM, rglanrg...@free.fr wrote: You seem to be the only person here currently using 2011, everyone else seems to have jumped from 2010--2012. I wonder why? I guess I'll just ... I've stayed with Win2011 because I really don't like the current implementation of the

Re: [Finale] 2012 vs 2010

2012-04-20 Thread Daniel Wolf
I'm very happy with Finale 2011 (Win) but am weighing whether Unicode is important enough to switch to 2012. (On the other hand, because I occasionally do Sibelius work, I did the upgrade from 6 to 7 for a specific project, but that's been regrettable, as the new ribbon design is an eye

[Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread Greg Hamilton
Hello Everyone, I'm currently working with a score with linked parts. I'm creating cues in Layer 4 and then applying (in the score) the Staff Style blank notation with rests. This works fine until you create a REAL whole rest in the part and vertically reposition the rest. The whole rest is

Re: [Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread John Blane
Re-define the staff style to NOT show notes in other layers On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Greg Hamilton wrote: Hello Everyone, I'm currently working with a score with linked parts. I'm creating cues in Layer 4 and then applying (in the score) the Staff Style blank notation with rests.

Re: [Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread Christopher Smith
That's a good solution, until there is a bar where the cue occurs along with real notes to be played. I put in the rests as expressions. Christopher On Fri Apr 20, at FridayApr 20 4:18 PM, John Blane wrote: Re-define the staff style to NOT show notes in other layers On Apr 20, 2012, at

[Finale] 2010, 2011, 2012 . . .

2012-04-20 Thread Jamin Hoffman
I prefer to use 2010, but the publisher I work most with uses only 2011, so I use that for scores intended for them.  I have started experimenting some with 2012; so far, no big issues, once I found the Score Manager.   (Mr.) Jamin Hoffman 2745 S. 44th St. Milwaukee, WI 53219 (414) 218-2130

Re: [Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread John Blane
Chris, in this scenario, would you even be using the staff style? On Apr 20, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: That's a good solution, until there is a bar where the cue occurs along with real notes to be played. I put in the rests as expressions. Christopher On Fri Apr 20,

Re: [Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread Christopher Smith
No, I wouldn't. With the cue in the same layer as the real music, it shows up correctly, even with voiced parts. If you don't want the cue to show in the score, you can hide it with a staff style there, and hide the rests if necessary. I have been conducting a lot of concert band music

Re: [Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread John Howell
At 9:27 PM -0400 4/20/12, Christopher Smith wrote: No, I wouldn't. With the cue in the same layer as the real music, it shows up correctly, even with voiced parts. If you don't want the cue to show in the score, you can hide it with a staff style there, and hide the rests if necessary. I have

Re: [Finale] Whole Rests in Blank Notation

2012-04-20 Thread Christopher Smith
On Fri Apr 20, at FridayApr 20 10:40 PM, John Howell wrote: At 9:27 PM -0400 4/20/12, Christopher Smith wrote: No, I wouldn't. With the cue in the same layer as the real music, it shows up correctly, even with voiced parts. If you don't want the cue to show in the score, you can hide it