On 7/9/05, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the issue of just how accurate Sibelius' claim of 1
users switching from Finale to Sibelius really is. I would expect that
it is true that 1 users took advantage of the competitive upgrade;
however, this was painless,
On 7/6/05, Tyler Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think GPO is going to be a much bigger
selling point that linked parts. Why? How many times
do composers click play as opposed to extracting
parts? I don't believe part extraction is done as
commonly as some people here believe.
On 7/6/05, Aaron Sherber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In dynamic parts, each part is nothing more or less than a special
view of the score.
From a software engineering standpoint, this is the way it should be.
Word processors and many other applications have been doing this for
years: Store the
On 7/1/05, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, iTunes is like that, too -- I am not going to use it for
burning CDs, so I've turned off the system service it insists on
installing. This means iTunes complains every time I start it that
the CD burning service is not running so
I used to hope for Finale on Linux, because of the instability of
WinDoze. However, now that the Mac runs on FreeBSD (Unix), there is no
need for that. When a process (like Word, etc.) misbehaves on the Mac,
I go to a console window and kill it (rather than having to reboot as
on Micro$oft).
