Personally I would appreciate if my various plug-in vendors all supplied
VST3 implementations. It makes things cleaner. That isn't just a
Dorico issue. VST2 will soon have its 20th birthday. VST3 has been out
there almost a decade. It is high time that vendors move forward.
By the same to
On Thu, July 12, 2018 1:45 pm, Steve Schow wrote:
> Steinberg has had a strict stance
> on copy protection for a very long time with Cubase and has documented very
> well that this is just how it is, and how it will always be. Of course of
> Steinberg goes out of business, which is unlikely to hap
That is very very unlikely to ever change. Steinberg has had a strict stance
on copy protection for a very long time with Cubase and has documented very
well that this is just how it is, and how it will always be. Of course of
Steinberg goes out of business, which is unlikely to happen any tim
On 7/3/2018 10:47 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
[snip]> Similarly, most of the appearance-related things are controlled
by rules
(aka preferences). They are extraordinarily numerous. I think Dorico
has broken new ground in organizing vast numbers of options. Practically
all of the options are di
Regarding the questions about Dorico support and how typical this is of
Steinberg in general, I'd say Dorico is the anomaly here. Steinberg has
a reputation for being a bit arrogant. As a relatively recent Cubase
user, I'll say that I didn't find Steinberg warm and fuzzy, but there
are enough
I agree with everything David has said, especially "Dorico is not for
everybody." Certainly there are some rough spots and missing pieces
that are deal breakers for some people today. My personal deal-breakers
were addressed in 2.0, but others have different needs. And even if
Dorico could d
On Tue, July 3, 2018 1:53 pm, David H. Bailey wrote:
> 1) Very strict anti-piracy!
Yes, this is the deal-breaker for me. No company is trustworthy, especially
about their future, and Steinberg's continued use of user-punishing protection
is unacceptable. I don't use any of their protected products
y things (including
layout) better and will save a lot of time.
However, for me, I must have slash notation and rhythmic notation
because mostly I do jazz band arrangements. And those things were not
there in Dorico 1. The final release of Dorico 1 included chord
symbols, and they did a f
how well the music layout
>> happened, almost completely automatically. I find myself spending many
>> hours fiddling with Finale parts to get them to lay out reasonably. It is
>> clear to me that Dorico does many things (including layout) better and will
>> save a lot o
ut) better and will save a lot of time.
However, for me, I must have slash notation and rhythmic notation
because mostly I do jazz band arrangements. And those things were not
there in Dorico 1. The final release of Dorico 1 included chord
symbols, and they did a fantastic job with that
t have slash notation and rhythmic notation
because mostly I do jazz band arrangements. And those things were not
there in Dorico 1. The final release of Dorico 1 included chord
symbols, and they did a fantastic job with that -- much more coherent
than Finale.
Dorico 2 adds slash and rhythmic
David's post here could almost have been written by me (except that I
only started using Finale at version 3.5). I bought version 1 of
Dorico, and I immediately purchased version 2.
What I find interesting is that there are parallels in the development
of Dorico and the development of Sibeliu
I’m not anywhere near switching, but I’ve been following Dorico’s development
with more than a little interest. Such informative posts like this one are
quite useful and much appreciated - thanks for such a detailed,
well-thought-out, well-stated comparison and review.
Doug
> On May 31, 2018,
I bought Dorico when it came out, and have been learning it, on and off.
Generally, I’ve stopped when I encounter a problem, confirm with John Barron or
Daniel Spreadbury that my problem is something not yet addressed. Then, when an
update comes out (there have been 3 or 4 free updates — this on
I mean, Finale is capable of producing all the results shown in the "Smart
Staff Management" video. But the U.I. for doing it can be quite laborious.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Will Roberts
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Sure, I found it here:
>
> https://www.dorico.com/new-in-2/
>
> Looks like
Hi Robert,
Sure, I found it here:
https://www.dorico.com/new-in-2/
Looks like it's on YouTube here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp8qDzPA77A
I also saw some worked-through examples in the review on Scoring Notes.com.
I'm right in saying that Finale has nothing like this, right? Or did I mi
Could you send a link to the demo? I would be interested in seeing how
sting divisi are handled.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:11 AM, Will Roberts
wrote:
> Did anybody else get an email from Steinberg yesterday about the new
> version of Dorico? I tried the first version out about a year ago but
> d
Did anybody else get an email from Steinberg yesterday about the new version of
Dorico? I tried the first version out about a year ago but didn't buy it at the
time. Interested to check it out again now.
The main new features are for composing to picture and playback automation,
which doesn't i
18 matches
Mail list logo
