Re: [Finale] Fwd: New plug-in: JW Make Finale Work Properly

2011-04-05 Thread David W. Fenton
On 5 Apr 2011 at 10:00, David H. Bailey wrote: > It's like they've never even focused on what the music they've been > playing for many years actually looks like. > > And people willing to accept default output from any program, whether > a word processor, an engraving program, whatever are all t

Re: [Finale] Fwd: New plug-in: JW Make Finale Work Properly

2011-04-05 Thread David H. Bailey
On 4/5/2011 7:39 AM, Matthew Hindson Gma wrote: Yeah, well, the situation was probably that the engraver had little to no time to do it, and wasn't paid that much, and there was no adequate proof reader on the publisher end with time to go over their work. Not that that's an acceptable excuse, es

Re: [Finale] Fwd: New plug-in: JW Make Finale Work Properly

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Hindson Gma
Yeah, well, the situation was probably that the engraver had little to no time to do it, and wasn't paid that much, and there was no adequate proof reader on the publisher end with time to go over their work. Not that that's an acceptable excuse, espec for a big company like Peters, but it se

Re: [Finale] Fwd: New plug-in: JW Make Finale Work Properly

2011-04-05 Thread Jari Williamsson
On 2011-04-05 02:26, SN jef chippewa wrote: Next month: SuperJari presents a real and functioning GUI for Score. Sorry, that GUI will be delayed, since working on that eye-sight-test script for Sib users takes so much time. ;-) Unfortunatelly, it seems like I'll have to port this test to Fi