Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-13 Thread Jonathan Smith
In which case it would be wise to include a treble clef E flat part (transposed up a sixth plus an octave) in addition to the other parts. Jonathan Ah but in this case, I wouldn't want a tuba sound to play sax music. I'm better off supplying a real transposed tuba part. (The Bari Sax and T

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-12 Thread Ryan
Ah but in this case, I wouldn't want a tuba sound to play sax music. I'm better off supplying a real transposed tuba part. (The Bari Sax and Tuba don't always play the same music...) On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Yes, because as I mentioned, that part would be the same

[Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-12 Thread Jonathan Smith
Yes, because as I mentioned, that part would be the same as the E flat Bari Sax part. They usually include both instrument names at the top of the part. Jonathan On 12 May 2010, at 19:00, requ...@shsu.edu> wrote: Thanks for that valuable info. In your Tuba list, you didn't include Eb T

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-11 Thread Ryan
Thanks for that valuable info. In your Tuba list, you didn't include Eb Treble Clef. Was that intentional? On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > I direct a band here in France and play Euphonium in 2 others, so I have > first hand experience about the transposition

[Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-11 Thread Jonathan Smith
Hi Ryan, I direct a band here in France and play Euphonium in 2 others, so I have first hand experience about the transposition of Tubas & Euphoniums. There are very few players who are taught to read in C (Ut), non transposed, concert pitch, although most modern editions for both Euph

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-11 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
, Williams, Jim wrote: > From: Williams, Jim > Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition > To: "finale@shsu.edu" > Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 3:20 PM > [humor] OK, there seems to be some > offense here that I called the  > thing an octave key. Perh

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-11 Thread Christopher Smith
alve would have to be as long as the open bugle. It isn’t so. Klaus --- On Tue, 5/11/10, Williams, Jim wrote: From: Williams, Jim Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition To: "finale@shsu.edu" Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 5:02 AM To me it is an octave key in that low r

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-11 Thread Williams, Jim
ngth of the open bugle and lowers >>> the instrument the interval of a fourth. The sum of a fifth and a >>> fourth happens to be an octave but that doesn’t make the 4th val >>> ve a >>> n octave valve. The visual proof is, that an octave valve would have >>&g

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-11 Thread Christopher Smith
ng as the open bugle. It isn’t so. Klaus --- On Tue, 5/11/10, Williams, Jim wrote: From: Williams, Jim Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition To: "finale@shsu.edu" Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 5:02 AM To me it is an octave key in that low register. Look at the fingering

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Williams, Jim
5/11/10, Williams, Jim > wrote: > >> From: Williams, Jim >> Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition >> To: "finale@shsu.edu" >> Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 5:02 AM >> To me it is an octave key in that low >> register. >> Look

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
rom: John Howell > Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition > To: finale@shsu.edu > Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 6:21 AM > Hi, Klaus.  I believe that he > was saying that without a compensating system the lowest > notes combining all 4 valves will be sharp, similar to the

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread John Howell
From: Williams, Jim Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition To: "finale@shsu.edu" Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 5:02 AM To me it is an octave key in that low register. Look at the fingering: Eb 1 low eb 1-4 d 1-2 low d 1-2-4 Db 2-3 low db 2-3-4 c 1-3 low c 1-3-4 B 1

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
isn’t so. Klaus --- On Tue, 5/11/10, Williams, Jim wrote: > From: Williams, Jim > Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition > To: "finale@shsu.edu" > Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 5:02 AM > To me it is an octave key in that low > register. > Look at the f

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Mike McGowan
: From: Williams, Jim Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition To: "finale@shsu.edu" Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 3:38 AM More tuba trivia: A four-valve non-compensating tuba is not fully chromatic in the low register. With an Eb tuba, 4 valves, no compensating, low a is 2-

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Williams, Jim
ce > rt for. There also are a few 3 valve compensating tubas in CC, but I > haven’t come by one yet. > > Klaus > > --- On Tue, 5/11/10, Williams, Jim > wrote: > >> From: Williams, Jim >> Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition >> To: &qu

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
rom: Williams, Jim > Subject: Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition > To: "finale@shsu.edu" > Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 3:38 AM > More tuba trivia: > A four-valve non-compensating tuba is not fully chromatic > in the low  > register. > With an Eb tuba,

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Williams, Jim
More tuba trivia: A four-valve non-compensating tuba is not fully chromatic in the low register. With an Eb tuba, 4 valves, no compensating, low a is 2-4, ab is 1-4, g is 2-3-4, gb is 1-3-4 (and sharp), f is 1-2-3-4 and very sharp and low e natural doesn't exist. For a BBb tuba with 4 valves,

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread John Howell
At 5:15 PM -0700 5/10/10, Ryan wrote: When a writing for tuba, the part should be written at sounding (concert) pitch, correct? If the performer is using an Eb tuba, they don't need a transposed part, do they? Here's the situation, a group in France wants some of my band music. However, they use

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Williams, Jim
Self-reference... Are there also BBb tuba parts? If so you might have to do that horrendous "transposing bass clef" abomination in which the part is transposed up a step but stays in bass clef. Leduc editions call this "tuba Sib." It's still used in France & Belgium. When I become King August

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Christopher Smith
I agree. Many French E flat tubists read treble clef parts (with bari sax transposition) just like their British brass band counterparts, but there may be some who prefer a concert pitch bass clef part. Make sure the part NAME states the transposition, so the librarian can just read the par

Re: [Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Williams, Jim
You are best served here to give them two Eb tuba parts--one at pitch in bass clef and one using bari sax transposition--treble clef written middle C equals Eb below the bass staff. You would be correct of you noticed that the parts will look alike, but accidentals will pose problems. Tubists

[Finale] Slightly OT: Tuba Transposition

2010-05-10 Thread Ryan
When a writing for tuba, the part should be written at sounding (concert) pitch, correct? If the performer is using an Eb tuba, they don't need a transposed part, do they? Here's the situation, a group in France wants some of my band music. However, they use Eb horns and Eb tubas. No problem to tra