[Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Robert Patterson
I'm preparing to convert from OS9 to OSX, and I will need to get an OSX macro program. Comments on this list from several months back suggested that iKeys might be better. But recently, it sounds like QuickKeys may be regaining the upper hand. Any current comments would be appreciated. In

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Randolph Peters
At 8:23 AM -0600 1/27/05, Robert Patterson wrote: I'm preparing to convert from OS9 to OSX, and I will need to get an OSX macro program. Comments on this list from several months back suggested that iKeys might be better. But recently, it sounds like QuickKeys may be regaining the upper hand.

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hi Robert, QuicKeys has a 30-day demo, and you can use iKey unregistered for (I think) as long as you want, so long as you are willing to put up with a nag screen. I think both can do what you want (sequences within sequences), so why not futz around with both and see which one best meets

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread JohnBlane
In a message dated 1/27/05 9:10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm still in QuicKeys X version 2, but I don't have a big need to upgrade to v.3 because I can do everything I want with the current version. I have to agree. The initial horror of QKX v.1 (their first attempt to port to OSX -

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Simon Troup
OK sorry if this is stupid but what's TAN: mean? I'm embarrassed already. Simon Troup Digital Music Art - Finale IRC channel server: irc.chatspike.net port: 6667 channel: #Finale - ___ Finale mailing

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Simon Troup
One thing to note about quickeys, we're on MAC OSX 10.3 and already on Quickeys X3, each version is a significant overhaul, these aren't minor increments, the application is being very actively developed. I can't comment on iKeys but I've been using Quickeys since OS9 and on OSX since X1. I

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hiro, the interface isn't just inconsistent from iKey 1.x, it is an absolute mess. *Everything* is a sequence -- it's no longer possible to create a simple one-step shortcut without jumping through all kinds of hoops. You can no longer type in keyboard shortcuts (if they already exist in

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread Robert Patterson
A quick visit to the two websites is making this a much easier choice. QuickKeys X3 is not supported on Jaguar whereas iKeys is. (And iKeys is half the cost.) I've been a huge supporter of QuickKeys over the years, but their failure to provide a migration path for macros from OS9 to OSX has

Re: [Finale] TAN: QuickKeys or iKeys?

2005-01-27 Thread finale
I have had experience with both. Quickeys was great on OS 9. I dropped it completely since I moved to OS X and have been getting by with Ikey. Now that QK 3 is out, and Ikeys 2 is out I have spent some (read: too much) time fiddling with both. Quickeys now does what they say it will do, and