John Howell wrote:
At 4:04 PM -0500 3/19/05, dhbailey wrote:
There is a way to do what you want, it's just that Finale programmers
haven't figured out how to do it. :-(
My bet is the first notation software which does that (Sibelius,
Finale or the newly developping Notion software from
David Bailey wrote:
As for Dennis' fear of losing access to Finale, I agree, it's not
paranoid.
If Dennis's fear was losing access to data in files created with
Sibelius, I would agree that it would not be paranoid. However, at
least the ~.etf file format of Finale is open, and anyone who
On 22 Mar 2005 at 22:39, John Howell wrote:
At 4:04 PM -0500 3/19/05, dhbailey wrote:
There is a way to do what you want, it's just that Finale
programmers haven't figured out how to do it. :-(
My bet is the first notation software which does that (Sibelius,
Finale or the newly
To my question:
If one uses ~.etf as the primary storage format for Finale data files,
one will not lose access to the data in the files. . ..
David Fenton wrote
How successful is the import of ETF files in these other programs?
How usable are the programs themselves? Do they lack capabilities
On 23 Mar 2005 at 6:13, dhbailey wrote:
As for Dennis' fear of losing access to Finale, I agree, it's not
paranoid. But copy protection isn't what has done Mosaic in, it's the
advancing OS which has left the old code in the dust and the
developper of Mosaic decided to pull the plug on the
On 23 Mar 2005 at 14:51, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
To my question:
If one uses ~.etf as the primary storage format for Finale data
files, one will not lose access to the data in the files. . ..
David Fenton wrote
How successful is the import of ETF files in these other programs?
How usable
John Howell wrote:
But MotU seem no longer to be supporting Mosaic, despite this
ability. My son-in-law was smart enough to get it operable for me in
OSX Classic, so I can (for the moment) still access hundreds of my
scores, but soon I'll inevitably lose them. Dennis' fear of losing
access
Owain Sutton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
Or they aren't even trying.
I think Finale, with its unlinked templates and unlinked libaries, is
terribly flawed at a basic conceptual level
My bet is the first notation software which does that (Sibelius,
Finale or the newly developping Notion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly sure that this is a daft question and that I know the answer
already, anyway, here goes.
I engraved the score and parts for a work which was recorded for CD today.
During the recording session, the composer had second thoughts about a
number of things,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:48:02 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way of linking the score and extracted
parts so that the changes I make in the score are reflected in the parts so
that I don't have to re-extract them (I don't want to have to re-tweak
them)
The link isn't going to
On 19 Mar 2005 at 16:04, dhbailey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly sure that this is a daft question and that I know the
answer already, anyway, here goes.
I engraved the score and parts for a work which was recorded for CD
today.
During the recording session, the
Thanks Christopher (and everyone else who has offered help with
this),
That sounds like an easier way than doing everything twice. I'll
experiment with it and see if any problems appear.
There are lots of articulations/bowings added but the notes themselves are
unchanged, but the parts
David W. Fenton wrote:
Or they aren't even trying.
I think Finale, with its unlinked templates and unlinked libaries, is
terribly flawed at a basic conceptual level
My bet is the first notation software which does that (Sibelius,
Finale or the newly developping Notion software ... will
13 matches
Mail list logo
