I really hoped Finale would get professional again and fix the EPS support
after about 10 years...:-(
I ordered it believing this would happen, but I guess I will have to switch
to Sibelius finally... (They got it to work, so they really must be the
better programmers). Sh*t! I NEED EPS
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before
features in a development
cycle?
Existing bugs, new bugs and new features are all
addressed concurrently during the development cycle.
When they start developing new features in an existing
area of the program, they are often pulling open old
Well, this is all speculation on my part, of course. But, first, I am
talking about EPS not PDF. I can make PDFs.
Even if a Microsoft competitor to EPS were only as successful as WMA vs. MP3
that would be fine with me. After all, I can make a WMA and send it to just
about anyone in the world and
Richard Yates wrote:
Well, this is all speculation on my part, of course. But, first, I am
talking about EPS not PDF. I can make PDFs.
Even if a Microsoft competitor to EPS were only as successful as WMA vs. MP3
that would be fine with me. After all, I can make a WMA and send it to just
about
At 10:58 AM 06/25/2005, dhbailey wrote:
Garritan Personal Orchestra is supported, but only in WindowsXP (plus
Mac, of course).
I'd love to know why this supported in XP but not 2000.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Richard Yates wrote:
We do not have the list of fixed issues yet, as the program is not yet
finished. That list will not be available until the program is shipping.
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before features in a development
cycle?
Not necessarily. Program code isn't a huge
At 6/23/2005 08:33 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
We do not have the list of fixed issues yet, as the program is not yet
finished. That list will not be available until the program is shipping.
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before features in a development
cycle?
No, because adding new
On 24 Jun 2005 at 14:23, d. collins wrote:
dhbailey écrit:
And then there are the long-standing issues such as EPS export on the
Windows side of things. If the developers haven't been able to fix
it in the previous how many versions, what makes you think they've
learned how for this
Regarding EPS, my hope is that when they're tearing
things apart to get ready for Longhorn that this will
be something that needs to get addressed. It's
probably going to be a nightmarish year for them with
two large platform changes arriving (Longhorn and Mac
Intel), and there might be some deep
On 24 Jun 2005 at 11:31, Tyler Turner wrote:
Regarding EPS, my hope is that when they're tearing
things apart to get ready for Longhorn that this will
be something that needs to get addressed. It's
probably going to be a nightmarish year for them with
two large platform changes arriving
--- David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Longhorn is *not* going to make their lives simpler,
because MS is
implementing a competitor to PDF in Longhorn, and
perhaps this new
standard will go beyond that towards doing what EPS
does. MM is going
to have to decide if they will
On 24 Jun 2005 at 13:10, Tyler Turner wrote:
--- David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Longhorn is *not* going to make their lives simpler,
because MS is
implementing a competitor to PDF in Longhorn, and
perhaps this new
standard will go beyond that towards doing what EPS
does.
I'm actually kind of skeptical about that. I think that PDF is too
well-established as a universal standard at this point. I think MS's
attempt to impose their own proprietary alternative to PDF will go
about as well as their attempt to impose WMA as an alternative to MP3
(i.e., not a
13 matches
Mail list logo
