Hello Randolph,
I'm still interested and curious. What makes going to 2002 better than going
directly to 2008? I'm not looking for a huge list just a few things. I'm
just wondering if I should fire up those old computers because there is
something that I'm not seeing in the upgrade process that 20
Steve has a point. Finale 2008 does some things fairly well when
opening an old file. Mid-measure clef changes stay put, for example.
But the best method I've tried still involves going through v2002 first.
-Randolph Peters
Steve Fiskum wrote:
I understand the issues with 2009 but what abou
I understand the issues with 2009 but what about upgrading directly to 2008?
Steve
5/11/09 9:20 AM, "Randolph Peters" wrote:
> The biggest problem in upgrading old files to Finale 2009 is the
> scattering of expressions. In the files I was working with, most of my
> dynamics showed up far to t
The biggest problem in upgrading old files to Finale 2009 is the
scattering of expressions. In the files I was working with, most of my
dynamics showed up far to the right of the page. A dynamic attached to
beat 2 in the original might show up as belonging to beat 10 in the
upgraded file. A
Hello Randolph,
Very interesting. I've upgraded 100s of 2.63 choral files and have good
results going directly to 2008. Out of curiosity, what type of music are you
upgrading and what types of issues were you having (I agree that 2009 is a
disaster to upgrade directly)?
Thanks,
Steve
5/10/09 10
