Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote: In two of those, someone posted a reply designed to make me feel like an idiot. Call me thin-skinned, but that doesn't feel much like the caring and supportive community so many have claimed this list to be. Yes, I will call you thin-skinned.

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread John Howell
At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote: If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize -- but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I have had too many listserv experiences (here, the Logic-Users forum, heck even the listserv for my

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 1/28/05 1:12 PM, John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote: If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize -- but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I have had too many listserv experiences

[Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Title: [OT] Curious ... who did it? Hey yall -- Sorry for the OT post, but I figured it was a happy one so no one would mind. I was at rehearsal last night, and got curious. Did anybody on this list engrave the Vaughan Williams Dona Nobis Pacem choral score for Oxford University Press? Im only

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it is artistry, no? Dean On Jan 25, 2005, at 7:12 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote: Hey yall -- Sorry for the OT post, but I figured it was a happy one so no one would

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it is artistry, no? There is actually a long historical tradition of doing just that. In a great many

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 1/25/05 1:05 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it is artistry, no? There is actually

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Jari Williamsson
Michael L. Meyer wrote: After reading this, Andrew, I checked the back page and found Processed and printed by Halstan Co. Ltd., Amersham, Bucks., England. SCORE? When was it published? Best regards, Jari Williamsson ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Michael L. Meyer wrote: Not that I ever got into the music OR education business for the glory, but it sure would be nice if engraving credit were given with regularity/consistency.  I lucked out that the few professional engraving jobs I've worked happened to have a

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Cool ... I have never noticed. Dean On Jan 25, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it is artistry, no?