On 11.07.2008 David W. Fenton wrote:
But 10.3 is quite dated now.
I just don't understand this mentality. According to Wikipedia,
Panther was released Oct. 24, 2003, which means it's less than 5
years old. I'm running WinXP on my laptop and Win2K on my desktop,
which means that both of my
On 11.07.2008 Andrew Stiller wrote:
I have Mac OS 10.3, wh. apparently FinMac 09 won't support. Since long, bitter
experience has taught me *never* to upgrade an OS, but rather to buy a new
computer with the upgraded version already on it, Finale 09, promising though
it seems, is definitely
10.3 to 10.4 is painless, unless you need to do file sharing over
Ethertalk (highly unlikely).
Upgrading to 10.5 is a much bigger step, and I disrecommend it. I use
10.5 exclusively now, but I had to upgrade much of my software to get
there. I did upgrade one computer from 10.4, and I found it to
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
I did upgrade one computer from 10.4, and I found it to be the
most annoying and troublesome upgrade ever foisted on me by Apple. (It
was still far easier than major Windows upgrades, though.)
My system is not very complex, but I found
Wow Robert, I had no file sharing trouble in my venture from 10.3 to
10.4. In fact, file sharing is one area that has been trouble-free
for me all the way thru OS X. But the upgrade the 10.5 was quite
problematic, as yours. I'm convinced mine was due to the gawd-awful
Migration
On 11 Jul 2008 at 19:14, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
But 10.3 is quite dated now.
I just don't understand this mentality. According to Wikipedia,
Panther was released Oct. 24, 2003, which means it's less than 5
years old. I'm running WinXP on my laptop and Win2K on my desktop,
which means that
This has always been the tradeoff between Apple and Microsoft.
Microsoft tends to value backwards compatibility, but moves very
slowly to evolve their OS and software into superior products, since
they are stuck in a quagmire of backwards compatibility. Even the
ages old 8086 processor
At 7/11/2008 01:30 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
(It was still far easier than major Windows upgrades, though.)
Interesting observation.
WinNt4 to Win2000 was mindless, no changes needed.
Win2000 to WinXP was mindless, no changes needed.
WinXP to Vista is annoying. But Finale 3.7 runs fine on
Hence the mess you have they call vista.
On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:34 AM, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11 Jul 2008 at 19:14, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
But 10.3 is quite dated now.
I just don't understand this mentality. According to Wikipedia,
Panther was released Oct. 24,
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09? How many of you will stay
with '08? Let the discussion begin!
Patrick J. M. Sheehan
Woodlawn Arts Academy, Instructor, Music Director
Centennial Auditorium, Music Director Conductor
P.S. Music
Host, The Saturday Night Blues: 89.5
How many haven't left 2006 yet?!!
I might be convinced to upgrade if the Engraver slurs really *do* work now...
-Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Sheehan asked:
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09? How many of you will stay
with '08?
Well, I'm still using '06, so it's probably time for
me to upgrade.
--- Patrick Sheehan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09?
How many of you will stay with '08? Let the
discussion begin!
Patrick J. M. Sheehan
Woodlawn Arts Academy, Instructor,
Patrick Sheehan wrote:
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09?
Yes.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
--- Cecil Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many haven't left 2006 yet?!!
I might be convinced to upgrade if the Engraver
slurs really *do* work now...
That's why I'm thinking of ugrading.
-Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Sheehan asked:
Anyone see any features worth
On Thu, July 10, 2008 11:05 am, Lora Crighton wrote:
--- Cecil Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might be convinced to upgrade if the Engraver
slurs really *do* work now...
That's why I'm thinking of ugrading.
If other vector features worked, then I'd really pay attention! I'm
talking Shape
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09? How many of you
will stay with '08? Let the discussion begin!
I'll upgrade, but keep 2008 working in parallel until I'm comfortable
with 09.
I use 2008 on a daily basis, both in teaching as well as my personal
Patrick Sheehan queried:
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09?
Even though I see important functions that don't seem to be addressed
(fixing and improving linked parts, for example), this upgrade
doesn't seem to have too much added fluff. The improvements in the
way we can
I saw Tom Carruth demo '09 on Tuesday. He said there were things they
still needed to fix with linked parts. Duh. I told him that linked
parts weren't useful for most composers and he countered with how
useful they were for those using Smart Music. Clearly, that's where
the main thrust of
Staying with 2007 thanks
Patrick Sheehan wrote:
Anyone see any features worth working with in '09? How many of you will stay
with '08? Let the discussion begin!
Patrick J. M. Sheehan
Woodlawn Arts Academy, Instructor, Music Director
Centennial Auditorium, Music Director Conductor
19 matches
Mail list logo
