I would like to share with all of you how I FINALLY worked out the problems
I've had installing SIBELIUS 6.
After many exchanges with the folks at SIBELIUS, including an offlist note from
one of their heavies, I can now tell all of you what I had to do.
The final analysis was the fact that the
Does anyone know if Finale 2005 runs on Vista?
Thanks,
Ruth
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Yes, yes it does. That's what I'm running.
Adam
Ruth H. Randle wrote:
Does anyone know if Finale 2005 runs on Vista?
Thanks,
Ruth
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
I haven't upgraded since '03, but that runs fine on Vista on my notebook.
-Carl Donsbach
Ruth H. Randle wrote:
Does anyone know if Finale 2005 runs on Vista?
Thanks,
Ruth
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
I see that there is no sub-heading for MIDI in VISTA, though the Device
Manager lists my EDIROL PCR-1 as a midi source.
The problem is that all works fine for a while, but eventually I have no
keyboard recognized in Speedy Entry, and 2008 tells me there is no midi
driver.
Restarts help, but the
I decided to go ahead and move to VISTA, though not without many
headaches. FINALEs before 2007 have issues with a great deal of VISTA, not
to mention GPO and related apps.
I called (by mistake) FINSUPPORT to reset my licenses. In the course of
the discussion I noted a bit of ? that I had not
Gotta love those Dell Monitors.
Funny thing about the Support call. I actually had someone who is
involved with SmartMusic development leave a comment on my website about
my issues with SmartMusic 10.1. Amazing. Perhaps there are a few people
out there that listen..
Henry E. Howey
On 3 Feb 2007 at 16:36, Phil Daley wrote:
At 07:02 PM 2/2/2007, David W. Fenton wrote:
But, since this was not a problem in XP, whose fault is it???
It's the fault of the software maker for not updating the
application to work in Vista. Or, your fault, if you've chosen to
install on
dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Moore wrote:
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI that allows me to
set the size of the handle square.
I did want to point out that MakeMusic have finally included
that option in the Program Options dialogue (Finale2007)
At 07:02 PM 2/2/2007, David W. Fenton wrote:
But, since this was not a problem in XP, whose fault is it???
It's the fault of the software maker for not updating the application
to work in Vista. Or, your fault, if you've chosen to install on
Vista an app that hasn't been upgraded for
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why do you need to edit those? Don't your
applications provide UIs for changing their settings?
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI
that allows me to set the size of the handle square.
--
Ken Moore
Ken Moore wrote:
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why do you need to edit those? Don't your
applications provide UIs for changing their settings?
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI that allows me
to set the size of the handle square.
Oh, well now you
dhbailey wrote:
Ken Moore wrote:
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why do you need to edit those? Don't your
applications provide UIs for changing their settings?
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI that allows me
to set the size of the handle square.
Oh,
On Feb 2, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Ken Moore wrote:
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI that allows
me to set the size of the handle square.
I don't know about WinFin 2004, but FinMac 2006 has this under
Program OptionsEditMovable ItemsHandle Size. My default is 8
pixels,
On 2 Feb 2007 at 8:16, Ken Moore wrote:
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why do you need to edit those? Don't your
applications provide UIs for changing their settings?
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI
that allows me to set the size of the handle
On 2 Feb 2007 at 6:18, dhbailey wrote:
dhbailey wrote:
Ken Moore wrote:
David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why do you need to edit those? Don't your
applications provide UIs for changing their settings?
Please will you tell me the place in the WinFin 2004 UI that allows
At 2/2/2007 08:00 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Of course, why one simply can't edit the permissions on these files
manually to get around the problem, I can't say. I'd assume that Phil
is knowledgable enough to have tried that.
Yes, even logging in as administrator did not fix the problem.
Phil
On 2 Feb 2007 at 8:22, Phil Daley wrote:
At 2/2/2007 08:00 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Of course, why one simply can't edit the permissions on these files
manually to get around the problem, I can't say. I'd assume that
Phil is knowledgable enough to have tried that.
Yes, even logging
At 2/2/2007 08:40 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 2 Feb 2007 at 8:22, Phil Daley wrote:
At 2/2/2007 08:00 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Of course, why one simply can't edit the permissions on these files
manually to get around the problem, I can't say. I'd assume that
Phil is knowledgable
At 08:59 AM 2/2/2007, Phil Daley wrote:
In Vista, you are not allowed access to files in some directories. You
cannot even see them in explorer. And it has nothing to do with them being
hidden, it has to do with them being system.
Just curious, can you give an example? Have you tried enabling
At 2/2/2007 10:56 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 08:59 AM 2/2/2007, Phil Daley wrote:
In Vista, you are not allowed access to files in some directories. You
cannot even see them in explorer. And it has nothing to do with them being
hidden, it has to do with them being system.
Just curious,
At 12:41 PM 2/2/2007, Phil Daley wrote:
At 2/2/2007 10:56 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 08:59 AM 2/2/2007, Phil Daley wrote:
In Vista, you are not allowed access to files in some directories. You
cannot even see them in explorer. And it has nothing to do
with them being
hidden, it has
On 2 Feb 2007 at 8:59, Phil Daley wrote:
At 2/2/2007 08:40 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 2 Feb 2007 at 8:22, Phil Daley wrote:
At 2/2/2007 08:00 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Of course, why one simply can't edit the permissions on these
files manually to get around the problem,
On 2 Feb 2007 at 13:15, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 12:41 PM 2/2/2007, Phil Daley wrote:
At 2/2/2007 10:56 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 08:59 AM 2/2/2007, Phil Daley wrote:
In Vista, you are not allowed access to files in some
directories. You cannot even see them in explorer. And
Daniel Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime, I've move so much over to Linux
that Finale is the only program I need to use
which requires Windows.
That makes at least two of us who would benefit from a
Linux version of Finale. A more likely possibility would
be to run Finale in a
On 31 Jan 2007 at 22:22, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:52 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Did you consider trying a little Googling to see if your gut belief
was true? Why would a died-in-the-wool PC user assume that his
guesses about the Mac would be correct?
Unless the PC
On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:05 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Actually, that *doesn't* count as an eggcorn -- it's just a brain-
fart typo, since I know the correct spelling for dyed-in-the-wool.
The definition of an eggcorn is that the wrong spelling has been
justified by some line of reasoning that is
On 1 Feb 2007 at 8:52, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:05 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Actually, that *doesn't* count as an eggcorn -- it's just a brain-
fart typo, since I know the correct spelling for dyed-in-the-wool.
The definition of an eggcorn is that the wrong spelling has
A good bunch of reasons not to upgrade to Vista (yet)
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=220blogid=2
- Original Message -
From: Richard Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:29 AM
Subject: RE: [Finale] Vista (?)
Mine has been
At 1/30/2007 02:46 PM, Eric Fiedler wrote:
To all the PC gurus and/or beta-testers on the list,
I know it's probably a little too early to ask, but have you had the
time and/or opportunity to form an opinion or develop a gut feeling
of how our favorite program will run under MS's new OS? I'm
On 31-Jan-07, at 3:07 AM, Marcello Noia wrote:
A good bunch of reasons not to upgrade to Vista (yet)
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=220blogid=2
I dunno, I'm even a Mac guy, and this guy doesn't seem to really know
what he's talking about. While I'm happy that he seems to
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:17, Christopher Smith wrote:
On 31-Jan-07, at 3:07 AM, Marcello Noia wrote:
A good bunch of reasons not to upgrade to Vista (yet)
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=220blogid=2
I dunno, I'm even a Mac guy, and this guy doesn't seem to really know
At 1/31/2007 11:17 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On 31-Jan-07, at 3:07 AM, Marcello Noia wrote:
A good bunch of reasons not to upgrade to Vista (yet)
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=220blogid=2
I dunno, I'm even a Mac guy, and this guy doesn't seem to really know
what he's
On 31-Jan-07, at 12:10 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 11:17 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Anybody with some better data on Vista? I'm thinking of a MacPro that
would be able to run Vista, so I would be interested in how it works.
My comments on Vista (I have been running it for 6 months)
Everyone has had different experiences with Windows machines, but on the
basis of Win98, which was seriously flawed until Win98SE came out (and
MS didn't offer free upgrades), and WinXP, which took two service packs
to solve some serious issues (and the second Service Pack doesn't load
on all
At 1/31/2007 12:29 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
I am thinking a MacPro will NOT be able to run Vista.
This is more to the point. Do you know any reasons why not?
It has super copy protection stuff so that it doesn't even install/run on
all PCs that well.
I would make sure that someone has
On 31 Jan 2007 at 12:10, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 11:17 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On 31-Jan-07, at 3:07 AM, Marcello Noia wrote:
A good bunch of reasons not to upgrade to Vista (yet)
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=220blogid=2
I dunno, I'm even a Mac
On 31 Jan 2007 at 12:50, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 12:29 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
I am thinking a MacPro will NOT be able to run Vista.
This is more to the point. Do you know any reasons why not?
It has super copy protection stuff so that it doesn't even install/run
on all
At 1/31/2007 01:40 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
You cannot modify zillions of files
that you used to have access to.
You don't *need* modify access to those files. Files you *need*
access to should be stored in your user profile, which is under your
full control. Any looser access to
On 31 Jan 2007 at 13:57, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 01:40 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
You cannot modify zillions of files
that you used to have access to.
You don't *need* modify access to those files. Files you *need*
access to should be stored in your user profile, which is
At 1/31/2007 02:13 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 13:57, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 01:40 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
You cannot modify zillions of files
that you used to have access to.
You don't *need* modify access to those files. Files you *need*
access to
On 31 Jan 2007 at 14:30, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 02:13 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 13:57, Phil Daley wrote:
I AM talking about Documents and Settings,
those files are now protected and non-modifiable.
Which ones? Your document files or your application settings
Maybe if you two are going to go back and forth on this, you can do it
privately?
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 14:30, Phil Daley wrote:
At 1/31/2007 02:13 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 13:57, Phil Daley wrote:
I AM talking about Documents and Settings,
Here's a report on running Vista using Parallels (i.e., emulation) --
it works, but not very well:
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/vista-on-intel-mac-with-parallels-
not-quite-there-232596.php
Boot Camp, on the other hand (i.e., installing Vista on the Mac and
rebooting into Vista)
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:52 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Did you consider trying a little Googling to see if your gut belief
was true? Why would a died-in-the-wool PC user assume that his
guesses about the Mac would be correct?
Unless the PC users have been smothered in a pile of sweaters, I
To all the PC gurus and/or beta-testers on the list,
I know it's probably a little too early to ask, but have you had the
time and/or opportunity to form an opinion — or develop a gut feeling
— of how our favorite program will run under MS's new OS? I'm not
asking so much for myself, as we
Mine has been ordered. I will report.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fiedler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:47 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Vista (?)
To all the PC gurus and/or beta-testers on the list, I know
it's probably a little too early
47 matches
Mail list logo
