Okay, it appears the problem is that the Depends for pymol all mention
python2.2-specific things and AFAICT building this pacakge really does
require python2.2, but then during the compile it uses whatever python
/sw/bin/python is, which could be (as on your system) python2.3.
I'm cc-ing the
Curious, is there any particular advantage to running Pymol under X11
rather than the OS X native version of Pymol?
Thanks,
Jeff
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and
Guy Lauquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Okay, it appears the problem is that the Depends for pymol all mention
python2.2-specific things and AFAICT building this pacakge really does
require python2.2, but then during the compile it uses whatever python
/sw/bin/python is, which could be (as on your
Jeff Blume [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Curious, is there any particular advantage to running Pymol under
X11 rather than the OS X native version of Pymol?
Dunno (I haven't used it myself in a long time). Maybe more
comfortable interface? Multiple mouse buttons make a lot of 3D
graphics easier. It
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am installing 'pymol' but it fails with the message below.
---
echo /^LINKPATH=/s%=.*%= % sedscript
echo /^BASELIB=/s%=.*%= % sedscript
echo /^BASESETUP=/s%=.*%=% sedscript
sed -f sedscript ./Makefile.pre.in Makefile.pre
cp ./Setup.in
