At 17:59 Uhr -0800 20.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On Sun, 2002-01-20 at 13:43, Martin Costabel wrote:
I vote NO. There are excellent reasons for staying with the present
format. IMHO one of the secrets of Fink's spectacular success is just
this extreme simplicity of the format of the
Christian Swinehart wrote:
Here's the bug I ran across:
[cds@moth ~] % sudo /sw/sbin/makewhatis /sw/share/man/
/usr/bin/awk: syntax error at source line 20 in function closeline
context is
return close (pipe_cmd);
Whatis /sw/bin/makewhatis? I don't have such
I have thought about this a little more,
Option 1)
I will make you a 3.1.17 package. You'll have to make sure it
links against libdb-3.1 not lib db3 and you'll have to add
-I%p/include/db31 to your CFLAGS (the headers will be in
db31/db3). The package will depend on db3, and only install the
Christian: I fixed this in CVS, but at the cost of adding gawk and
findutils as dependencies. Maybe Max's thin script idea is the way to
go after all...
-Jeff
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Christian Swinehart wrote:
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 02:41 pm, Jeff Whitaker
wrote:
I don't
On lundi, janvier 21, 2002, at 02:26 , Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Christian: I fixed this in CVS, but at the cost of adding gawk and
findutils as dependencies. Maybe Max's thin script idea is the
way to
go after all...
Yes, I think this goes too far. Now I would have to install (and
run,
I think option 3 would work best for now, unless other packages need
db3.1.17 (I don't think they do). I don't think we want another db package.
I have thought about this a little more,
Option 1)
I will make you a 3.1.17 package. You'll have to make sure it
links against libdb-3.1 not lib
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 11:25 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I know it seems unlikely, but Red Hat closed my bug with a patch to
build rpm on MacOSX, with a comment like:
Since Apple is working on this port, we don't need to.
(Not an exact quote, but..)
Hmm yes, I noticed Dave Zarzycki
On Monday, January 21, 2002, at 06:28 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
I don't know where guys look these things up...or maybe it's an
experience
thing...anyhow anyone know where to find these.
Look like the standard C++ library... Try setting the cc to c++ for
compilation.
-- Finlay
I mean, would we have 'apt-get install xchat-ssl-nognome' or what?
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 04:59 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 9:42 Uhr + 19.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 04:27 am, Alexander Strange wrote:
What do we do about apt-get?
Nothing?
