Re: [Fink-devel] Re: macgimp pkgs and fink (was Re: plan and otherpackage systems)

2002-01-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Gordon Messmer wrote: On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 16:33, Alexander Strange wrote: As long as there are no spaces in the path, I believe it would be lsbom /Library/Receipts/foo.pkg/Contents/Resources/foo.bom | sudo rm -rf I think you mean xargs sudo rm -rf You can use lsbom -p F to get the

[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2

2002-01-22 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Folks: I'm working on xfree86-base-4.2.0 and xfree86-server-4.2.0 packages. All is fine with the base package, but the server package will not build if fink's make package is installed. What's the best way to deal with this? We have a BuildDepends, but not a BuildConflicts. Should I just use

Re: [Fink-devel] plan

2002-01-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I just had a thought on the plan and new file format. Instead of going to a different package file format keep the one we have and use ar or tar to make them into one file. The archive could also contain the patches. Fink would then look at the file names in the archive to determine

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2

2002-01-22 Thread Max Horn
At 6:06 Uhr -0700 22.01.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Folks: I'm working on xfree86-base-4.2.0 and xfree86-server-4.2.0 packages. Uhm... bad coordination, I guess. I started the work on this two days ago, and I am in the testing phase right now :) All is fine with the base package, but the