At 22:29 Uhr -0500 24.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
[... snipped explanation of why shlibs are good ...]
David, I think you are preaching to the choir here. Martin didn't
argue against the shlibs stuff here, just against the -bin stuff
(which I don't like much myself, but oh well). No
Uhm... why not just make the header packages (e.g. orbit) depend on the
binary package (orbit-bin), which would immediatly solve all the
strange problems, and in fact might be required anyway in many cases
(e.g. many unix libs requrie their foo-config apps to be useful for
development
At 1:37 Uhr +0100 25.02.2002, Jorge Acereda Maci· wrote:
David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
installed by the 10.1.3 upgrade. I don't know how to check the version
number of sh or zsh, which Matthias said was 3.0.8 in his case.
I am running 10.1.3, I have zlib 3.0.8, but gdk-pixbuf
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pythonmac-sig/1042874
It seems Fink is being used by more and more folks that are not
necessarily familiar with Darwin or Unix. Providing them with better
feedback during the installation process would likely make these folks'
lives easier.
Okay, what exactly do you mean by better feedback?
Peter
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:50 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pythonmac-sig/1042874
It seems Fink is being used by more and more folks that are not
necessarily familiar with Darwin or
On lundi, février 25, 2002, at 01:40 , Max Horn wrote:
So i strongly doubt that the system update is the culprit. Rather
something else that has been changed recently.
Matthias, since when exactly do you have these problems?
My problems are different, but also persistent. I compiled
I enclose a suggested addition to the shared libraries documentation.
I believe that it addresses the problems Martin has uncovered. Any
comments?
-- Dave
Packages containing both binary files and libraries
When an upstream package contains both binary files and libraries, some
care must
Hi,
Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori
hasn't noticed yet...
I am sure he'll fix it as and when he gets the time. It is,
after all the unstable tree we are talking about here :)
Am copying him.
Peter
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 12:53 AM, Martin Costabel
On lundi, février 25, 2002, at 05:30 , Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Hi,
Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori hasn't
noticed yet...
Bingo! I removed gtk-doc, and the rebuild of gdk-pixbuf completed
without a hitch. So there should probably be some --disable-gtk-doc
option
Your code doesn't look like it's using threads... I missed the early
part of this thread. Did you say that this problem is OS X specific,
for sure?
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 22:12, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
Nope.. no help. It's looking like the problem might be that errno is
being set in one
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:20 , David R. Morrison wrote:
Packages containing both binary files and libraries
When an upstream package contains both binary files and libraries, some
care must be exercised in constructing fink packages. In some cases,
the only binary files will be
Well.. that's good news! (I think!) So.. any idea how to find out what
resource is temporarily unavailable?
thanks,
-steve
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:14 PM, Jorge Acereda Maciá wrote:
Gordon Messmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, if the errno is coming from a different thread,
fink describe lyx and fink describe xdvi will reveal the email addresses
of the maintainers.
The download URL for xdvi was fixed quite some time ago. You need to update
using fink selfupdate-cvs and then the corrected xdvi-22.48-1.info file
will be used.
-- Dave
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:58 , David R. Morrison wrote:
Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:20 , David R. Morrison wrote:
Packages containing both binary files and libraries
[snip]
I would recommend that the foo package not be foo3. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
