Re: [Fink-devel] dlopen

2002-03-30 Thread John Clark
Am Samstag den, 30. März 2002, um 22:34, schrieb Chris Zubrzycki: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >> where does darwin hide its dlopen? I've seen it mentioned on google >> that there are wrappers for it, but i could not find any relevent >> information. i was working on lic

Re: [Fink-devel] dlopen

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > where does darwin hide its dlopen? I've seen it mentioned on google > that there are wrappers for it, but i could not find any relevent > information. i was working on licq and it wants dlopen: nevermind. sorry, I guess it is time for bed. - -ch

[Fink-devel] dlopen

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 where does darwin hide its dlopen? I've seen it mentioned on google that there are wrappers for it, but i could not find any relevent information. i was working on licq and it wants dlopen: checking for dlopen in -lc_r... no checking for dlopen in

[Fink-devel] twolevel fun

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 anyone have an idea on how to stop dante from including the same file twice on a link? it causes it to fail every time. It uses automake and libtool, anf the only place I find the library is in the makefile, not the makefile.in or .am. Or am I comp

Re: [Fink-devel] default config files and fink policy

2002-03-30 Thread Ben Hines
At 11:42 PM -0500 3/30/02, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >this file when it comes time to remove the package. if ConfFiles >smart enough to not care if this file is not packaged with the .deb, >but will still try to remove it at remove time? What would be the >best way to remove this file if it cant?

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses, and hard coded paths

2002-03-30 Thread Ben Hines
At 11:01 PM -0500 3/30/02, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >got a bunch of tarballs that were requested on the trquest tracker, >and many of them do not use automake/autoconf. Do I need to write a >custom automake script for each package? BTW, some of those request tracker items are just hanging around

Re: [Fink-devel] default config files and fink policy

2002-03-30 Thread David R. Morrison
One possible solution: if the configuration file is /sw/etc/foo.conf, put in your InstallScript "touch %i/etc/foo.conf" and then include this file in the list of Configuration files. That way, it will be treated by dpkg and friends like any other configuration file. -- Dave _

[Fink-devel] default config files and fink policy

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a question about the conffiles field. One of my packages, minicom, the first time it is run, asks you to run it as root with the - -s option, so that a working site config can be created. It is up to the sys admin to make sure the settings a

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses, and hard coded paths

2002-03-30 Thread Alexander Strange
On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 11:01 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > I know this already, but that begs another question: if there is no > configure script, and the install/lib locations are hardcoded into the > makefile/make script, how would I go about changing them so they are > compatible wi

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> At 10:12 PM -0500 3/30/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >>> Put -I/sw/include in CFLAGS and -L/sw/lib in LDFLAGS. >> >> >> Nope, never use /sw. :) That can be anything. Always use %p. > > hmm...does not want to work. I still get this, even on the comma

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > At 10:12 PM -0500 3/30/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >> Put -I/sw/include in CFLAGS and -L/sw/lib in LDFLAGS. > > > Nope, never use /sw. :) That can be anything. Always use %p. hmm...does

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses, and hard coded paths

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > At 10:12 PM -0500 3/30/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >> Put -I/sw/include in CFLAGS and -L/sw/lib in LDFLAGS. > > > Nope, never use /sw. :) That can be anything. Always use %p. I know this

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses

2002-03-30 Thread Ben Hines
At 10:12 PM -0500 3/30/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >Put -I/sw/include in CFLAGS and -L/sw/lib in LDFLAGS. Nope, never use /sw. :) That can be anything. Always use %p. -Ben -- http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses

2002-03-30 Thread Ben Hines
At 9:08 PM -0500 3/30/02, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > >I am working on building c-kermit, and I wanted to use ncurses. the >makefile has a build option for mac os x with curses as well as >ncurses, but if I ise the ncurses option, it tells me ncurses.h >cannot be found. what is the best way to pat

Re: [Fink-devel] including ncurses

2002-03-30 Thread Alexander Strange
Put -I/sw/include in CFLAGS and -L/sw/lib in LDFLAGS. On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 09:08 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I am working on building c-kermit, and I wanted to use ncurses. the > makefile has a build option for mac os x with curses

[Fink-devel] including ncurses

2002-03-30 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am working on building c-kermit, and I wanted to use ncurses. the makefile has a build option for mac os x with curses as well as ncurses, but if I ise the ncurses option, it tells me ncurses.h cannot be found. what is the best way to patch the m