Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases

2002-04-06 Thread Max Horn
At 17:21 Uhr -0800 05.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote: At 7:11 PM +0100 4/5/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote: For those of you who missed fully reading and comprehending Max's message, building the binary distribution on the OS X Compiler Farm is too much of a security risk, which is why I made my suggestion.

Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases

2002-04-06 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: 1) Stable-Move-Phase We try to get as many package to stable. This way we can ensure a big binary distro, plus stable users have more current stuff. Of course, we still must be careful doing so, it's no use to have packages in stable that don't work properly. So don't rush!

[Fink-devel] FinkCommander 0.1.3 Released

2002-04-06 Thread Steven Burr
There is a new release of FinkCommander available at: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=48896release_id=83199 You can access this link from FinkCommander's new SourceForge web site at: http://finkcommander.sourceforge.net/ The most significant change is that FC now allows

[Fink-devel] ghostscript6-nox | ghostscript-nox

2002-04-06 Thread Martin Costabel
Jeff, in the ghostscript6-nox info file there are 2 identical lines Conflicts: ghostscript, ghostscript-nox, ghostscript6 Shouldn't the second one rather say Replaces:? And shouldn't there be a line Provides: ghostscript-nox so that packages that don't care what version of ghostscript is

Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Devers
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Martin Costabel wrote: OTOH, I have no feedback (except that they compile) on the packages - siag (a complete, small, office suite) I've just opened up the spreadsheet. Seems to work ok, but then I'm not pushing it in any significant way. Ahh ok, the other components are

[Fink-devel] Re: xmms-bin-1.2.7-1 does not build

2002-04-06 Thread Kilian Koepsell
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:33:20AM +0900, Masanori Sekino wrote: It seems that you are missing gnome-core package. But fink should install it before building xmms-1.2.7-1. What is the result of this command? $ dpkg -l xmms\* fink root# dpkg -l xmms\* fink gnome-core ii xmms

[Fink-devel] Fwd: why would this change and break?

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Apr 5, 2002 9:05 PM, Chris Zubrzycki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why would it use tmpdepfile='.deps/fifo.TPo, and then switch to .deps/../src/, like tmpdepfile='.deps/../src/conf.TPo, where it fails? I don't know why the

[Fink-devel] automake conflict with libvorbis

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 there is a conflict in libvorbis-1.0rc3-3 [chris@n1-20-136:~$] fink info automake Information about 907 packages read in 1 seconds. pkg automake version ### pkg automake version 1.6-2 automake-1.6-2: Makefile generator GNU Automake is a

Re: [Fink-devel] automake conflict with libvorbis

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sorry, nevermind. a rebuild compiled with no problems. strange. - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt ID: 0xA2ABC070 Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3 1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070

[Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread Benjamin Reed
Since I'm the new guy as far as CVS access, I wanted to get an OK before I do anything; I've got a number of perl modules I've packaged up that I use myself for various scripts. Is it OK if I add them to unstable, or does someone want to look them over first? convert-tnef-pm-0.17-1.info

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread David R. Morrison
Any new packages that you write, or updates to packages that you maintain, are fine to check in to the unstable directory. The important things to keep in mind about CVS are: (1) nothing goes to stable until it has been throughly tested by other users, (2) except for immediately-committed

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 10:28 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: ... (3) check to make sure that the things you are committing comply with fink's various policies. fink validate foo.info and fink validate foo.dev are very handy tools for

Re: [Fink-devel] new perl modules

2002-04-06 Thread Benjamin Reed
David R. Morrison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Any new packages that you write, or updates to packages that you maintain, are fine to check in to the unstable directory. The important things to keep in mind about CVS are: (1) nothing goes to stable until it has been throughly tested by other

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: why would this change and break?

2002-04-06 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 7/4/02 10:42 AM, Chris Zubrzycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Apr 5, 2002 9:05 PM, Chris Zubrzycki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why would it use tmpdepfile='.deps/fifo.TPo, and then switch to .deps/../src/, like

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: why would this change and break?

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With Justin's help everything is working great, except gift-gtk. openFT, gift-shell, and giFTcurs. I just wanted to get the gtk client working, and submit them all at once. On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 10:45 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 7/4/02