At 16:24 Uhr -0700 05.06.2002, Sasha Zucker wrote:
>Max,
>
>I am about to leave on a trip that will take me away from my
>computer, the Internet, and fink for up to and possibly more than a
>year. As such, I won'
>t be able to maintain the small number of packages I have
>contributed. What is t
On Thursday 06 June 2002 20:27, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 14:00, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> > I had heard someone mention this in passing, but never heard a good
> > explanation as to what happened. Considering qt-copy is 3.0.4 with some
> > modifications, I haven't heard before ab
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 14:00, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> I had heard someone mention this in passing, but never heard a good
> explanation as to what happened. Considering qt-copy is 3.0.4 with some
> modifications, I haven't heard before about the kde team recommending
> 3.0.3.
OK, the guys on #gen
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:48, geof wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As you know, there is a problem with kde3. Some app take a very long time to
> start. I had exactly the same problem with qt-3.0.4 and kde-3.0.1 on
> linux-ppc. The most simple solution is to install qt-3.0.3. With this
> version, I hav
Torrey,
Thanks for the heads up about forthcoming changes.
Actually, the fink team had a chance to figure out the lesstif problems
in advance of the 4.2 release, because we did have fink packages which
were tracking development versions of XFree86. We had identified that
there was an intermitte
The lesstif discussion reminded me that I should point out some
important changes that are coming soon for XFree86. The XonX project
will be releasing a bug fix update soonish to XFree86 from the 4.2
branch. In addition to fixing a few crashing bugs and adding Jaguar
compatibility, it will als
Hello all,
As you know, there is a problem with kde3. Some app take a very long time to
start. I had exactly the same problem with qt-3.0.4 and kde-3.0.1 on
linux-ppc. The most simple solution is to install qt-3.0.3. With this
version, I have no more problem on linux-ppc and it is recommanded
Hi Justin. The lesstif choice is a temporary thing... lesstif-dev is going
away, and once the new lesstif has been tested and I can move it to stable,
lesstif-dev will go away completely.
The other one, choosing between kdebase3 and kdebase3-ssl, is a well-known
shortcoming of fink: it asks you
thanks for the quick kleen explination Dave...I understand now...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Hi Justin. The lesstif choice is a temporary thing... lesstif-dev is
>going
>away, and once the new lesstif has been tested and I can move it to
>stable,
>lesstif-dev will go away completely.
>
>The othe
is it just me me or are these two choices odd, first lesstif, and with out
doing a fink list to see that the revision on -dev is -4 and the revision
on lesstif is -6 I'd never known to use lesstif. Then I told it to
install kde-ssl why ask me if i want kdebase3 to have ssl?? Anyhow i
don't know
At 5:25 AM -0400 6/5/02, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>(cd .libs && cc -c -fno-builtin -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions "etherealS.c")
>/sw/src/ethereal-0.9.4-2/ethereal-0.9.4/.libs
>etherealS.c:1972: syntax error, found `@'
This looks like it might related to the (large) am/libtool SED patch that is in
m
11 matches
Mail list logo
