On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 11:35 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 7:05 Uhr -0700 13.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
the faq says:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable
If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy
those .info files (and their associated .patch
On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 03:05 pm, Ben Hines wrote:
the faq says:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable
If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy those .info files (and their associated .patch files, if there are any) from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
But i have not found for what I´m searching for!!
I didn't, either :-)
--
Xavier
http://www.freetibet.org
http://www.tibet.fr/
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Martin :
cmd-v, to be hold down for a while at the beginning of the boot process.
Sounds to me that you rather see the _system_ (aka userland in BSDs)
booting.
--
Xavier
http://www.freetibet.org
http://www.tibet.fr/
---
This sf.net email
Brian: I don't think you need the No fortran option - the vanilla
LAM-MPI package could depend on g77, the LAM-MPI-absoft variant could
depend on system-fortran. I think absoft has the capability of linking
g77 libs, so in theory you could get away with one package.
Unfortunately, I've never
Ben Hines has asked me in private email why we need the %n (= %v-%r)
part of the new Shlibs field.
Although I can't give an example of this at the moment, I can explain
some future scenarios where this will be used.
Suppose that your package builds two shared libraries, libfoo.1.dylib
and
At 7:05 Uhr -0700 13.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
the faq says:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable
If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy
those .info files (and their associated .patch files, if there are
any) from
