[Fink-devel] Moving "scsh" package to stable

Dear Fink maintainers, I have received one report that my "scsh" package, currently in unstable, works correctly. I personally used it to install scsh on my machine after the 10.2 upgrade, and it works well, even on 10.2.2 now (I use scsh daily). I realise that one report (apart from mine) might

Re: [Fink-devel] About Fonts

On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 01:49 AM, Torrey T. Lyons wrote: At 7:08 PM -0500 11/16/02, Alexander Strange wrote: We don't really have to worry about this until XFree86 4.3, but... * XFree86 will be using the Fontconfig library. We should package our own version of this, patch it to reco

Re: [Fink-devel] About Fonts

At 7:08 PM -0500 11/16/02, Alexander Strange wrote: We don't really have to worry about this until XFree86 4.3, but... * XFree86 will be using the Fontconfig library. We should package our own version of this, patch it to recognize /sw/lib/X11/fonts, and tell XFree86 to build with it. *Boggle*

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 09:20 AM, Max Horn wrote: To me it seems an easy way out is to offer two commands: one for positive feedback, one for negative. Then the positive one could warn if feedback is done on stable/essential packages. The negative one OTOH might warn if a package is

Re: [Fink-devel] Gimp compile fails

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:14 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: I am using the latest fink-cvs Theres your problem. fink-cvs is experimental and not supported. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing

[Fink-devel] Gimp compile fails

Compiling the Gimp fails with the error: mkdir .libs gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I../intl -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2 -I/sw/include/glib-1.2 -I/sw/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -DPREFIX=\"/sw\" -DGIMPDIR=\".gimp-1.2\" -DDATADIR=\"/sw/share/gimp/1.2\" -DSYSC

Re: jobflags was Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be preboundright now

At 20:31 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Carsten Klapp wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't intend to start up a 'make' jobs discussion again. :/ A SafeReentrantMake flag in the info file would let the user configure his/her own maximum jobs appropriate for the speed of the machine. If at all such a setting would

jobflags was Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

I'm sorry, I didn't intend to start up a 'make' jobs discussion again. :/ A SafeReentrantMake flag in the info file would let the user configure his/her own maximum jobs appropriate for the speed of the machine. Carsten On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:51 pm, Benjamin Reed wrote: We co

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:51 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: We could add a SafeReentrantMake field, and then add -j2 if that field says it's safe. If it's going to be manual for every package, why not hand-add it to CompileScript then? So users can more easily disable it. -- Alexander St

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

We could add a SafeReentrantMake field, and then add -j2 if that field says it's safe. If it's going to be manual for every package, why not hand-add it to CompileScript then? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of sec

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:23 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 18:51 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Fair enough not to commit this to CVS right now, it potentially effects many packages. Anyway I understand a code fre

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

At 18:51 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Fair enough not to commit this to CVS right now, it potentially effects many packages. Anyway I understand a code freeze was declared to get the new version out so no reason why

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS / SF.net (scheduled) outage

Hi Max. Let's delay the code freeze until midnight GMT Monday night, to give folks a chance to catch up since sourceforge is down today. -- Dave --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL,

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Fair enough not to commit this to CVS right now, it potentially effects many packages. Anyway I understand a code freeze was declared to get the new version out so no reason why this cannot wait until the proper time can be dedica

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:08 pm, Max Horn wrote: The problem with this is that could cause a *lot* of regressions. Feel free to modify your local version of Fink and try, or even better, bootstrap a clean new install using it (verifying that still works with your change). I am not

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

At 17:11 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Carsten Klapp wrote: Hi all, I realized today that there are many fink programs which could be prebound right now but aren't, even though the fink dylib automatic prebinding isn't quite ready yet. Using 'otool -L' I made of list of binaries which link ONLY to Ap

[Fink-devel] CVS / SF.net (scheduled) outage

Just in case you have problems accesing SF.net CVS or our homepage - that is a scheduled maintainance outage. See also https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1 Dave, maybe the 0.5.0 freeze should be rescheduled to say tuesady to give people a last chance to fix up th

Re: [Fink-devel] RFC - Is KDE OK to move into stable?

Sounds fine to me. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web s

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: problems with XFree and system-xfree86

Thanks for your replies. I erased my /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11R6, and forced the removal of system-xfree86. Then I installed all the threaded packages (4 packages) But now, XDarwin won't launch anymore. Did I made something wrong or what ? Thanks for your help, Pejvan PS: I'm replying to your m

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: problems with XFree and system-xfree86

3.0.7-3 > pkg t1lib1-shlibs version ### > pkg t1lib1-shlibs version 1.3.1-2 > pkg librep-dev version ### > pkg librep-dev version 0.14-8 > pkg povray version ### > pkg povray version 3.50b-1 > pkg bc version ### > pkg bc version 1.06-11 > pkg kdetoys3 version ### &g

[Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

Hi all, I realized today that there are many fink programs which could be prebound right now but aren't, even though the fink dylib automatic prebinding isn't quite ready yet. Using 'otool -L' I made of list of binaries which link ONLY to Apple-supplied dylibs, there are probably more as this

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 11:42 am, Martin Costabel wrote: qtplay also does something illegal: SourceRename: %n-%v.c SourceDirectory: . CompileScript: << cp %p/src/%n-%v.c . The last line is not only superfluous, because SourceRename does precisely this, but it will also not work i

Re: [Fink-devel] RFC - Is KDE OK to move into stable?

I have none, they have worked very well for me since 3.0.7 was in your exp, so I dem them as stable as the code allows them to be without sound :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Are there any objections? -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[Fink-devel] Re: problems with XFree and system-xfree86

Probably you have libxine installed, or some other package that now depends explicity on xfree86-base-threaded. You can either remove your manual installation of xfree86 and install xfree86-base-threaded, or not update the package that is requesting it. -Jeff On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Pejvan BEIGUI

[Fink-devel] Problems with OpenLDAP Compiling

openldap-ssl compile fails with the following errors: /bin/sh /sw/src/openldap-ssl-2.0.23-5/openldap-2.0.23/libtool --mode=link cc -rpath /sw/lib -fno-common -I../../include -I../../include -I/sw/include/db3 -I/sw/include/cyrus-sasl -no-cpp-precomp -isystem /sw/include -L/sw/src/o

[Fink-devel] problems with XFree and system-xfree86

Hi, I made a selfupdate-cvs today, and while making an 'update-all' after that, fink wants to install all the xfree source packages and ignores my system-xfree86 package installed a while ago. So I'd like to know if this is a bug, or this is because the system-xfree is 4.2 and xfree86 is now 4

[Fink-devel] RFC - Is KDE OK to move into stable?

I'm not going to be able to get KDE 3.1 ready in time for the fink 0.5.0 bindist creation... So my question is, does everyone think the KDE 3.0.7 packages are stable enough to put into stable? Personally, I think they're at least better than the 3.0.2 ones in the 10.1 tree, even though there a

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

Peter O'Gorman wrote: [] qtplay I just tried, it makes quite a mess of the screen if it finds an actual movie, I am inclined to not move it, the others have been moved. qtplay also does something illegal: SourceRename: %n-%v.c SourceDirectory: . CompileScript: << cp %p/src/%n-%v.c . The la

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

At 22:37 Uhr -0700 16.11.2002, Steven Burr wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 07:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 11:43 AM, Max Horn wrote: Maybe we should ask the fink commander author to restrict reports only on packages that are actually *not* in stable?

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 10:42 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 08:16 AM, Carsten Klapp wrote: I received positive reports for a few of my unstable packages. How many positive reports are generally needed before making a binary is considered? One is g

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 08:16 AM, Carsten Klapp wrote: I received positive reports for a few of my unstable packages. How many positive reports are generally needed before making a binary is considered? One is generally fine, as long as you know it works too. Then what is the next

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

Steven, I don't think we have told you often enough how great we think FinkCommander is! Thanks for all of your hard work on it; I, for one, really appreciate having it. In fact, the whole recent discussion started because Ben and I had pointed out in separate messages on the fink-users list tha

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 10:16 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: I received positive reports for a few of my unstable packages. How many positive reports are generally needed before making a binary is considered? file 3.39-1, qtplay 1.1-1 Willy Traver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cmatrix

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

> I received positive reports for a few of my unstable packages. How many > positive reports are generally needed before making a binary is > considered? > > Then what is the next step, who should I report these confirmations to > in order to get binary packages started? Or do I email my debs > som

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 10:37 PM, Steven Burr wrote: Rather than providing crippled functionality, I would rather raise a dialog giving the user a brief explanation of when and how to communicate with maintainers when the e-mail command is invoked. The dialog would provide the op

[Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

I received positive reports for a few of my unstable packages. How many positive reports are generally needed before making a binary is considered? Then what is the next step, who should I report these confirmations to in order to get binary packages started? Or do I email my debs somewhere...

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 10:57 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 09:37 PM, Steven Burr wrote: I'm not crazy about this idea. What if a user discovers a problem with a stable package and wants to let the maintainer know? Why should he prevented from using

[Fink-devel] Fink requests for stable

Howdy I'm using enlightenment 0.16.5-8 and gtkengines 0.12-2 these both work well. Use enlightenment every day. Seems very quick and I've found a theme to match X. The theme I use with gnome gets taken on by many apps neato. Thanks for all the great stuff. Willy Traver reply to [EMAIL PROTECTE