A few more notes by me:
fink should be Fink here: fink is the package manager, Fink the whole
distro. Also, kde3 - KDE3. I present a slightly shorter alternate
headline, tell me which one you like more... I agree that we should
not try overly much to advertise for OS X, that is a maybe good
At 22:14 Uhr -0800 11.12.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Actually, nevermind.. looks like they may have done it again where
they release the final version to only some people first, then to
everyone a few days later. Anyway, its imminent.
-Ben
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 10:08 PM, Ben Hines
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:43:22 +0100
Subject: Re: [Fink-announce] Fink 0.5.0a released [Fink is totally awesome!]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548)
From: Anders Sjögren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Max,
Fink is totally awesome!
Hi,
I'm porting openafs to fink and it takes a long time to recompile
openafs. Is there ANY way that I can skip the compilation step and go
straight to Splitting off the packages?
Thanks,
Patrick Sodre
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
Ben, don't we have to do something about that new environment variable,
whatever it is, before we get users to upgrade? (I can't recall and
haven't installed the new tools yet myself.)
This might require the release of a new version of the package manager,
which sets that environment variable?
After some discussion on #fink this morning, we arrived at a strategy for
handling the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET environment variable.
Seems that this has been present since the July developer tools, and was
defaulting to 10.1. In the near future, the compiler will start issuing
warnings when
Hi Matt:
I've been making use of blt regularly for the last few months without
problems and I believe it is fine. I had to recompile it after
upgrading to tcltk version 8.4 (in unstable) but other than that it
hasn't caused any problems for me at least, and a lot of people who
were
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 09:00 AM, Patrick Sodré wrote:
Hi,
I'm porting openafs to fink and it takes a long time to recompile
openafs. Is there ANY way that I can skip the compilation step and go
straight to Splitting off the packages?
fink info ccache
it makes rebuilding very
At 9:05 Uhr -0500 12.12.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
Ben, don't we have to do something about that new environment variable,
whatever it is, before we get users to upgrade? (I can't recall and
haven't installed the new tools yet myself.)
This might require the release of a new version of the
Is there a problem with freetype2-hinting?
none of these packages that depend on freetype2 have a freetype2 |
freetype2-hinting in their dependencies.
is there a reason for that?
here the list of packages (i hope it is correct)
/sw/fink/10.2/unstable/crypto/finkinfo/evolution-1.0.7-2.info
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 16:44, Max Horn wrote:
Finally, we should not relay on the December tools before late
January, I'd say, and even then I am not happy about this. In the
very least, packages relaying on that version of the dev tools should
check for them and error out. I don't expect
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 10:32 AM, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
which programs require mozilla, and what is the nature of this
requirement?
Do these programs make use of mozilla specific libraries, or do these
programs simply use a html interface, similar to how cups uses
localhost:637?
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 02:18 PM, thomas kotzian wrote:
Is there a problem with freetype2-hinting?
none of these packages that depend on freetype2 have a freetype2 |
freetype2-hinting in their dependencies.
is there a reason for that?
Yes it is not needed, because,
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 17:37, Ben Hines wrote:
I disagree with this, and think that fink should set it to 10.2 for all
packages. Have you replicated this theoretical library breaking
scenario? Show me.
I think that's the wrong way to look at it. Have you confirmed that
setting it works
I will present a third way of looking at it: if you set this flag at 10.2,
you change the compiled binaries and hence the debs. Do we want to violate
long-standing Fink policy by doing this without changing version/revision
numbers?
-- Dave
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 04:14 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I will present a third way of looking at it: if you set this flag at
10.2,
you change the compiled binaries and hence the debs. Do we want to
violate
long-standing Fink policy by doing this without changing
My 'whois' package keeps breaking because the guy who develops it apparently
deletes the old versions as soon as he releases a new one. Anyone have a
suggestion as to a way to work around this? Is it acceptable to setup a
private mirror of the next-to-most-recent version of the source then use a
My 'whois' package keeps breaking because the guy who develops it apparently
deletes the old versions as soon as he releases a new one. Anyone have a
suggestion as to a way to work around this? Is it acceptable to setup a
private mirror of the next-to-most-recent version of the source then use a
Hi Brian,
Try a search on Google for the archive filename and another for the
md5sum itself to see whether anyone else is mirroring it too.
Here Google reveals that Debian is mirroring whois,
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/whois/whois_4.6.0.tar.gz so it
could be added as an
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 06:12 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Here Google reveals that Debian is mirroring whois,
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/whois/whois_4.6.0.tar.gz so
it could be added as an alternate CustomMirror:
Er, no. :) mirror:debian was added not too long ago.
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 06:12 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
It would be nice to be able to just add
mirror:debian:pool/main/w/%n/%n_%v.tar.gz, but fink doesn't support
mirror designations within CustomMirror yet. See:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
Compile with 'g++' instead of 'gcc', or add -lstdc++ .
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 09:43 PM, S Woodside wrote:
hi there,
I hope this list is an OK place to post this request. I'm trying to
port sablotron to OS X 10.2. As far as I can tell, it's not been
discussed here before. I've
True Ben, but I meant to point out that it is not possible to combine
the primary site (and secondary sites) together with a fink mirror
list, within a CustomMirror field like this:
Source: mirror:custom:%n_%v.tar.gz
CustomMirror:
Primary: http://www.linux.it/~md/software/
mirror:
I think this is the problem with gramps, pil doesnt actually build:
gcc -DNDEBUG -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-I/sw/src/root-pil-1.1.2-13/sw/include/python2.2-I/sw/include/python2.2
-I/usr/X11R6/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -isystem /sw/include -IlibImaging
-I/sw/include -I/sw/include
I noticed fink/dists is a symlink to the full path of 10.2:
ln -s /sw/fink/10.2 /sw/fink/dists
Wouldn't it be better to do:
ln -s 10.2 /sw/fink/dists
Then i wouldn't get confused when copying my fink installs around, when
I cd into /swbackup/fink/dists and it goes to the other install's dists
25 matches
Mail list logo
