On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 10:46 PM, Robert Boehne wrote:
In an older version of Libtool, a library built with -module is
linked with:
cc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/libdb_tcl-4.2.so *.lo
-lc -dynamiclib -install_name
/Users/rboehne/testdb/lib/libdb_tcl-4.2.so
That is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello peeps.
Nagios (which was Netsaint) will be my first largish package and I
would like to know, how I should go about doing this properly. There
are a number of issues.
a) The configure script needs to be created using autoconf pri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Donnerstag, Februar 6, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Benjamin Reed wrote:
(so why that would be the case is beyond me right now).
Because they might wish to take advantage of the speed improvements in
the new openssl package. Especially for onli
Hello,
I'm having problems with Mac OS/X in CVS Libtool, and I wonder
if some of you more familiar with the platform could help out.
In an older version of Libtool, a library built with -module is
linked with:
cc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/libdb_tcl-4.2.so *.lo
-lc -dynamiclib -
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:29 PM, John Clements wrote:
This is off-topic, but I'm hoping that someone can point out what an
idiot I am.
Problem: I can't get gcc to recognize either the CPATH or
C_INCLUDE_PATH env
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 05:04 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Merit: very smooth transition, users don't have to rebuild all their
-ssl packages for nothing.
Disadvantage: users have to explicitily rebuild these packages if for
some reason they insist on using openssl 0.9.7 (so why that would be
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 04:55 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
I don't know how to make fink packages, but could really need
Scigraphica, http://scigraphica.sourceforge.net.
Is this the same python dlopening crash that som
Please read this if your package currently depends on openssl.
The new openssl 0.9.7 is source but not binary compatible. Hence, I
renamed openssl-shlibs in it to openssl097-shlibs (as discussed here
previously). I will soon commit a change to *all* packages that
depends on openssl, with only
David R. Morrison wrote:
I agree with you that stability is important, and I plan to update Fink's
teTeX rather infrequently.
There were lots of good reasons for updating right now however, to the new
teTeX 2.0 upstream release. Perhaps the main one is that the licensing issues
have finally bee
At 15:53 Uhr -0500 05.02.2003, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:29 PM, John Clements wrote:
This is off-topic, but I'm hoping that someone can point out what
an idiot I am.
Problem: I can't get gcc to recognize either the CPATH or
C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variables
On Feb 5,2003 09:38:25 +0100, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> Dave M. thinks it's due to an upstream change in pdftex, and is looking
>> into it.
>
>It's deliberate breakage introduced by the new version of fancyhdr.sty:
>
>% Dec 9, 2002
>% version 2.1
>% T
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:29 PM, John Clements wrote:
This is off-topic, but I'm hoping that someone can point out what an
idiot I am.
Problem: I can't get gcc to recognize either the CPATH or
C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variables. Here's what I mean:
It's customarily CFLAGS, bu
This is off-topic, but I'm hoping that someone can point out what an
idiot I am.
Problem: I can't get gcc to recognize either the CPATH or
C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variables. Here's what I mean:
[osterley:~] clements% less tmp.c
#include
void main()
{
return;
}
[osterley:~] clements% ls
I agree with Max, it need a full rewrite, but the base idea is there I
think I need to meet Max in IRC again first though. But I have lots of
pkgs to update first anyhow likely won't even think about it till Saturday.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>No way, that is not even close to being releasable c
At 15:06 Uhr -0500 05.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Feb 5,2003 13:01:11 -0700, Justin Hallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
I think my cvs patch could make 0.12 as well, I'll add it to the tacker.
Do that, then I will review it, but I wouldn't hold my breath on it
making it to 0.12. That
I'll start re working that as soon as i get all my pkgs updated :) I
finally got pilot-link into unstable *phew*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Justin, what about your mirror thing too?
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett
-=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd.
-=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 5,2003 13:01:11 -0700, Justin Hallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>I think my cvs patch could make 0.12 as well, I'll add it to the tacker.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>more till we release 0.12 - I want to add Ben's epoch support first
>
>-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett
>-=[JFH] Blue Fall
I think my cvs patch could make 0.12 as well, I'll add it to the tacker.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>more till we release 0.12 - I want to add Ben's epoch support first
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett
-=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd.
-=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Feb 5,2003 21:01:03 +0100, Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>I think 0.11.2 can go to stable. However, I would like to wait a bit
>more till we release 0.12 - I want to add Ben's epoch support first
>and test it a little.
>
>
>Max
>
I'll move 0.l1.2 to stable, then.
Another thing that
I think 0.11.2 can go to stable. However, I would like to wait a bit
more till we release 0.12 - I want to add Ben's epoch support first
and test it a little.
Max
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 5, 2003, at 05:15 Uhr, Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 11:01 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The most recent version of the package manager, fink-0.11.2, was
released
on January 18. I've seen no co
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 11:01 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The most recent version of the package manager, fink-0.11.2, was
released
on January 18. I've seen no complaints about it, and obviously many of
us are using it. Is it ready for stable?
looks good to me.
The one in fink cv
The most recent version of the package manager, fink-0.11.2, was released
on January 18. I've seen no complaints about it, and obviously many of
us are using it. Is it ready for stable?
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceF
Jason,
The original guy who was working on docbook packages in the Fink project
left some time ago, so if you want to jump in, that would be great.
Also, since you and I happen to be at the same place, if you want to get
together over lunch or coffee some day, I can help you get things set up
in
Peter: No, I think the problems with scigraphica run much deeper than
that. I've sent many bug reports to the developers, but it looks as if it
is basically unmaintained right now. So, I don't think there is any
possibility of getting the scigraphica package in the 10.2 tree in the
near future.
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
I don't know how to make fink packages, but could really need
Scigraphica, http://scigraphica.sourceforge.net.
Is this the same python dlopening crash that some other poster had?
I don't know, does scigraphica expect a thread-sa
Thanks for all your help!
than there is a upstream problem with doxygen. because even the newer
version 1.3-rc3 of doxygen produces this tex-code. (it is included in
static form in der tar-file and can also be generated with doxygen
itself). What to do in this situation. html export from doxyge
I also want to transform docbbok into pdf, but xml-docbook, not sgml.
I tried :
_ fop, but can't even compile it. (problems of libraries)
_ passivetex and xmltex : here comes the problem : howto add a format
to an already existing tetex installation ?
I tried texconfig and the format option, and
Hello Fink developers. I hope this isn't too irrelevant to this list,
but I'm trying to get a program to compile for Darwin/X11 and I don't
really know what I'm doing, but I having fun so I thought I'd stick at
it. There is a Linux Makefile but it doesn't work (I can provide more
details). A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 5, 2003, at 03:25 Uhr, Jason Stajich wrote:
What have folks been generally using to produce PDF from their docbook
SGML?
I know that this might sound a funn, after all you are trying to
convert SGML to PDF. However I w
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Thorsten Bartels-Rausch wrote:
Hi,
I don't know how to make fink packages, but could really need Scigraphica, http://scigraphica.sourceforge.net. It used to be included in fink, does anyone of you has time to make a package?
scigraphica was removed
Hi,
I don't know how to make fink packages, but could really need
Scigraphica, http://scigraphica.sourceforge.net. It used to be included
in fink, does anyone of you has time to make a package?
And, could anyone look at the xchemdraw package in more detail. I just
don't manage to install it.
A
32 matches
Mail list logo
