[Fink-devel] linking questions

2003-02-28 Thread Justin Hallett
Makefile: libfoo_la_LDFLAGS = \ -version-info 1:0:0 \ -export-symbols foo.exp -export-dynamic \ -module this makes libfoo.so, libfoo.1.so and libfoo.1.0.0.so which doesn't seems right to me for a plugin. I remember Clef saying something about -export-dynamic and -module o

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 strategy

2003-02-28 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > Folks: Unless I hear objections, I'd like to commit these two > packages to unstable > > xfree86-4.3.0-1.info (which builds the new "unified" xfree86 4.3 package) > > and > > xfree86-upgrade-20030228-

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 strategy

2003-02-28 Thread Alexander Hansen
How about a message on fink-announce, too? > The only way users will know to use xfree86-upgrade is if they run "fink > info xfree86". Perhaps a message on the fink homepage is also warranted? > > I've put these files in experimental/jswhit/x11-system if you want to have > a look. > > -Jeff -

[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 strategy

2003-02-28 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Folks: Unless I hear objections, I'd like to commit these two packages to unstable xfree86-4.3.0-1.info (which builds the new "unified" xfree86 4.3 package) and xfree86-upgrade-20030228-1.info,patch (which is a shell script that performs the necessary dpkg -r --force-dep

Re: [Fink-devel] stable fink?

2003-02-28 Thread Max Horn
At 9:49 Uhr -0500 28.02.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: It's been out for a week? I hadn't noticed any changes! I'd say that from the user side of things (builiding/removing/updating etc.) it looks good. On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:33, David R. Morrison wrote: I'd like to move fink-0.12.0-1 to stab

Re: [Fink-devel] stable fink?

2003-02-28 Thread Alexander Hansen
It's been out for a week? I hadn't noticed any changes! I'd say that from the user side of things (builiding/removing/updating etc.) it looks good. On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:33, David R. Morrison wrote: > I'd like to move fink-0.12.0-1 to stable pretty soon. Any objections? > > (It's been out

[Fink-devel] stable fink?

2003-02-28 Thread David R. Morrison
I'd like to move fink-0.12.0-1 to stable pretty soon. Any objections? (It's been out for a week, there are many users with the unstable tree enabled, and there have been no reports on any mailing lists of trouble related to this... The developers are all using it and can give positive reports I w

Re: [Fink-devel] Advice needed: manpage filename conflicts

2003-02-28 Thread David R. Morrison
Fink has borrowed from Debian something called the "alternatives" system. If there are two packages which want to install files with the same name, both of them can use the alternatives system, which allows the two files to coexist on the system and allows the user to select which one of the files

Re: [Fink-devel] python23 alpha; epoch support documentation

2003-02-28 Thread Andrea Riciputi
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 21:17 Europe/Rome, Jeff Whitaker wrote: When I try, for example, "% fink install numeric" fink automatically downloads and installs python23 and then installs Numeric under v2.3 tree. This because the following line in Numeric .info file: If you install python22 first